Literature DB >> 15288839

An audit of the efficacy of the oral brush biopsy technique in a specialist Oral Medicine unit.

T W J Poate1, J A G Buchanan, T A Hodgson, P M Speight, A W Barrett, D R Moles, C Scully, S R Porter.   

Abstract

The diagnosis of oral epithelial dysplasia has traditionally been based upon histopathological evaluation of a full thickness biopsy specimen from lesional tissue. It has recently been proposed that cytological examination of "brush biopsy" samples is a non-invasive method of determining the presence of cellular atypia, and hence the likelihood of oral epithelial dysplasia. The present audit determined, retrospectively the sensitivity, specificity and positive and negative predictive values of the oral brush biopsy technique in the diagnosis of potentially malignant disease in a group of 112 patients attending a specialist Oral Medicine unit. The sensitivity of detection of oral epithelial dysplasia or squamous cell carcinoma of the oral brush biopsy system was 71.4% while the specificity was 32%. The positive predictive value of an abnormal brush biopsy result (positive or atypical) was 44.1%, while the negative predictive value was 60%. It is concluded that not all potentially malignant disease is detected with this non-invasive investigative procedure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15288839     DOI: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2004.02.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oral Oncol        ISSN: 1368-8375            Impact factor:   5.337


  38 in total

Review 1.  Current development of saliva/oral fluid-based diagnostics.

Authors:  Chih-Ko Yeh; Nicolaos J Christodoulides; Pierre N Floriano; Craig S Miller; Jeffrey L Ebersole; Shannon E Weigum; John McDevitt; Spencer W Redding
Journal:  Tex Dent J       Date:  2010-07

2.  High-molecular tenascin-C as an indicator of atypical cells in oral brush biopsies.

Authors:  O Driemel; R Dahse; A Berndt; H Pistner; S G Hakim; L Zardi; T E Reichert; H Kosmehl
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2006-11-17       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 3.  [Oral cytology: historical development, current status, and perspectives].

Authors:  M Hullmann; T E Reichert; R Dahse; F von Eggeling; H Pistner; H Kosmehl; O Driemel
Journal:  Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir       Date:  2007-01

Review 4.  Prevention of head and neck cancer.

Authors:  Terry A Day; Angela Chi; Brad Neville; James R Hebert
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 5.075

5.  The prognostic value of GLUT-1 staining in the detection of malignant transformation in oral mucosa.

Authors:  Roman C Brands; Olga Köhler; Stephan Rauthe; Stefan Hartmann; Harald Ebhardt; Axel Seher; Christian Linz; Alexander C Kübler; Urs D A Müller-Richter
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2016-09-08       Impact factor: 3.573

6.  A new bio-nanochip sensor aids oral cancer detection.

Authors:  John McDevitt; Shannon E Weigum; Pierre N Floriano; Nicolaos Christodoulides; Spencer W Redding; Chih-Ko Yeh; Stan McGuff; Nadarajah Vigneswaran; Martin H Thornhill; Michelle D Williams
Journal:  SPIE Newsroom       Date:  2011-03-28

7.  Noninvasive evaluation of oral lesions using depth-sensitive optical spectroscopy.

Authors:  Richard A Schwarz; Wen Gao; Crystal Redden Weber; Cristina Kurachi; J Jack Lee; Adel K El-Naggar; Rebecca Richards-Kortum; Ann M Gillenwater
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2009-04-15       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 8.  [Surgical treatment options for squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity].

Authors:  Michael Rasse
Journal:  Wien Med Wochenschr       Date:  2008

Review 9.  Critical evaluation of diagnostic aids for the detection of oral cancer.

Authors:  Mark W Lingen; John R Kalmar; Theodore Karrison; Paul M Speight
Journal:  Oral Oncol       Date:  2007-09-06       Impact factor: 5.337

Review 10.  Diagnostic aids in the screening of oral cancer.

Authors:  Stefano Fedele
Journal:  Head Neck Oncol       Date:  2009-01-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.