BACKGROUND: Optical spectroscopy is a noninvasive technique with potential applications for diagnosis of oral dysplasia and early cancer. In this study, we evaluated the diagnostic performance of a depth-sensitive optical spectroscopy (DSOS) system for distinguishing dysplasia and carcinoma from non-neoplastic oral mucosa. METHODS: Patients with oral lesions and volunteers without any oral abnormalities were recruited to participate. Autofluorescence and diffuse reflectance spectra of selected oral sites were measured using the DSOS system. A total of 424 oral sites in 124 subjects were measured and analyzed, including 154 sites in 60 patients with oral lesions and 270 sites in 64 normal volunteers. Measured optical spectra were used to develop computer-based algorithms to identify the presence of dysplasia or cancer. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated using a gold standard of histopathology for patient sites and clinical impression for normal volunteer sites. RESULTS: Differences in oral spectra were observed in: (1) neoplastic versus nonneoplastic sites, (2) keratinized versus nonkeratinized tissue, and (3) shallow versus deep depths within oral tissue. Algorithms based on spectra from 310 nonkeratinized anatomic sites (buccal, tongue, floor of mouth, and lip) yielded an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.96 in the training set and 0.93 in the validation set. CONCLUSIONS: The ability to selectively target epithelial and shallow stromal depth regions appeared to be diagnostically useful. For nonkeratinized oral sites, the sensitivity and specificity of this objective diagnostic technique were comparable to that of clinical diagnosis by expert observers. Thus, DSOS has potential to augment oral cancer screening efforts in community settings.
BACKGROUND: Optical spectroscopy is a noninvasive technique with potential applications for diagnosis of oral dysplasia and early cancer. In this study, we evaluated the diagnostic performance of a depth-sensitive optical spectroscopy (DSOS) system for distinguishing dysplasia and carcinoma from non-neoplastic oral mucosa. METHODS:Patients with oral lesions and volunteers without any oral abnormalities were recruited to participate. Autofluorescence and diffuse reflectance spectra of selected oral sites were measured using the DSOS system. A total of 424 oral sites in 124 subjects were measured and analyzed, including 154 sites in 60 patients with oral lesions and 270 sites in 64 normal volunteers. Measured optical spectra were used to develop computer-based algorithms to identify the presence of dysplasia or cancer. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated using a gold standard of histopathology for patient sites and clinical impression for normal volunteer sites. RESULTS: Differences in oral spectra were observed in: (1) neoplastic versus nonneoplastic sites, (2) keratinized versus nonkeratinized tissue, and (3) shallow versus deep depths within oral tissue. Algorithms based on spectra from 310 nonkeratinized anatomic sites (buccal, tongue, floor of mouth, and lip) yielded an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.96 in the training set and 0.93 in the validation set. CONCLUSIONS: The ability to selectively target epithelial and shallow stromal depth regions appeared to be diagnostically useful. For nonkeratinized oral sites, the sensitivity and specificity of this objective diagnostic technique were comparable to that of clinical diagnosis by expert observers. Thus, DSOS has potential to augment oral cancer screening efforts in community settings.
Authors: D L Heintzelman; U Utzinger; H Fuchs; A Zuluaga; K Gossage; A M Gillenwater; R Jacob; B Kemp; R R Richards-Kortum Journal: Photochem Photobiol Date: 2000-07 Impact factor: 3.421
Authors: Markus G Müller; Tulio A Valdez; Irene Georgakoudi; Vadim Backman; Cesar Fuentes; Sadru Kabani; Nora Laver; Zimmern Wang; Charles W Boone; Ramachandra R Dasari; Stanley M Shapshay; Michael S Feld Journal: Cancer Date: 2003-04-01 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Aaron M Mohs; Michael C Mancini; Sunil Singhal; James M Provenzale; Brian Leyland-Jones; May D Wang; Shuming Nie Journal: Anal Chem Date: 2010-10-06 Impact factor: 6.986
Authors: H Wolfgang Beumer; Karthik Vishwanath; Liana Puscas; Hamid R Afshari; Nimmi Ramanujam; Walter T Lee Journal: Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg Date: 2011-01-28 Impact factor: 3.497
Authors: K E Tipirneni; E L Rosenthal; L S Moore; A D Haskins; N Udayakumar; A H Jani; W R Carroll; A B Morlandt; M Bogyo; J Rao; Jason M Warram Journal: Mol Imaging Biol Date: 2017-10 Impact factor: 3.488
Authors: Shannon M Gallagher-Colombo; Harry Quon; Kelly M Malloy; Peter H Ahn; Keith A Cengel; Charles B Simone; Ara A Chalian; Bert W O'Malley; Gregory S Weinstein; Timothy C Zhu; Mary E Putt; Jarod C Finlay; Theresa M Busch Journal: Photochem Photobiol Date: 2015-07-02 Impact factor: 3.421
Authors: Diego R Yankelevich; Dinglong Ma; Jing Liu; Yang Sun; Yinghua Sun; Julien Bec; Daniel S Elson; Laura Marcu Journal: Rev Sci Instrum Date: 2014-03 Impact factor: 1.523
Authors: Yinghua Sun; Jennifer E Phipps; Jeremy Meier; Nisa Hatami; Brian Poirier; Daniel S Elson; D Gregory Farwell; Laura Marcu Journal: Microsc Microanal Date: 2013-05-23 Impact factor: 4.127