Literature DB >> 15281389

Stimulus salience and asymmetric forgetting in the pigeon.

John T Wixted1, Santino C Gaitan.   

Abstract

Pigeons were trained using a symbolic delayed matching-to-sample procedure involving bright versus dim houselight samples. We hypothesized that when sample stimuli differ in salience, increasing the size of the retention interval will affect performance on trials initiated by the more salient sample only. In agreement with this prediction, accuracy following the dim sample did not decline as the retention interval increased, whereas accuracy following the bright sample declined to well below 50% correct. In a second experiment, the less salient (dim) sample from Experiment 1 was arranged as the more salient sample in a sample/no-sample procedure. Accuracy on dim sample trials then declined to well below 50% correct as the retention interval increased, whereas accuracy on no-sample trials remained constant. The results suggest that when sample stimuli differ in salience, pigeons may transform the nominal discrimination task into a detection task in which they respond on the basis of the presence or absence of the more salient sample.

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15281389     DOI: 10.3758/bf03196018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Learn Behav        ISSN: 1543-4494            Impact factor:   1.986


  5 in total

Review 1.  Time and memory: towards a pacemaker-free theory of interval timing.

Authors:  J E Staddon; J J Higa
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  The interaction between stimulus and reinforcer control on remembering.

Authors:  D C McCarthy; M Davison
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Short-term memory for responses: the "choose-small" effect.

Authors:  J G Fetterman; D MacEwen
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  An interval scale of brightness for the pigeon.

Authors:  B Schneider
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1987-10

5.  Signal intensity and duration estimation in rats.

Authors:  P J Kraemer; R W Brown; C K Randall
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 1.777

  5 in total
  7 in total

1.  Disruption of temporal discrimination and the choose-short effect.

Authors:  Ryan D Ward; Amy L Odum
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 1.986

2.  Testing the translational-symmetry hypothesis of abstract-concept learning in pigeons.

Authors:  Jeffrey S Katz; Bradley R Sturz; Anthony A Wright
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 1.986

3.  On the development and mechanics of delayed matching-to-sample performance.

Authors:  Brian D Kangas; Meredith S Berry; Marc N Branch
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Rats exhibit asymmetrical retention functions for hedonic and nonhedonic samples in many-to-one symbolic delayed matching to sample.

Authors:  Angelo Santi; Sabrina Simmons; Shannon Mischler; Claire Hoover
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 1.986

5.  Use of a single-code/default strategy by pigeons to acquire duration sample discriminations.

Authors:  Rebecca A Singer; Emily D Klein; Thomas R Zentall
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 1.986

6.  Pigeons' memory for time: assessment of the role of subjective shortening in the duration-comparison procedure.

Authors:  Patrick Van Rooyen; Angelo Santi
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 1.986

7.  Matching-to-sample performance is better analyzed in terms of a four-term contingency than in terms of a three-term contingency.

Authors:  Brent M Jones; Douglas M Elliffe
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2013-05-31       Impact factor: 2.468

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.