Literature DB >> 15279514

A partial reinforcement extinction effect despite equal rates of reinforcement during Pavlovian conditioning.

Mark Haselgrove1, Aydan Aydin, John M Pearce.   

Abstract

In 4 experiments rats received appetitive Pavlovian conditioning followed by extinction. Food accompanied every trial with the conditioned stimulus (CS) for the continuously reinforced groups and only half of the trials for the partially reinforced groups. In contrast to previous experiments that have compared the effects of partial and continuous reinforcement, the rate at which food was delivered during the CS was the same for both groups. The strength of the conditioned response during extinction weakened more rapidly in the continuously than in the partially reinforced groups. The results demonstrate that the partial reinforcement extinction effect is a consequence of the nonreinforced trials with the CS, rather than the rate at which the unconditioned stimulus is delivered during the CS. (c) 2004 APA, all rights reserved

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15279514     DOI: 10.1037/0097-7403.30.3.240

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process        ISSN: 0097-7403


  22 in total

1.  Partial reinforcement effects on learning and extinction of place preferences in the water maze.

Authors:  José Prados; Joan Sansa; Antonio A Artigas
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 1.986

2.  Rescaling of temporal expectations during extinction.

Authors:  Michael R Drew; Carolyn Walsh; Peter D Balsam
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 2.478

3.  Partial reinforcement, extinction, and placebo analgesia.

Authors:  Siu Tsin Au Yeung; Ben Colagiuri; Peter F Lovibond; Luana Colloca
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2014-03-03       Impact factor: 6.961

4.  Uncertainty modulates value-driven attentional capture.

Authors:  Sang A Cho; Yang Seok Cho
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2020-11-05       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  Decreases in Cued Reward Seeking After Reward-Paired Inhibition of Mesolimbic Dopamine.

Authors:  Sarah Fischbach; Patricia H Janak
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2019-04-25       Impact factor: 3.590

6.  Extinction from a rationalist perspective.

Authors:  C R Gallistel
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2012-03-03       Impact factor: 1.777

7.  Conditioned fear extinction and reinstatement in a human fear-potentiated startle paradigm.

Authors:  Seth D Norrholm; Tanja Jovanovic; Bram Vervliet; Karyn M Myers; Michael Davis; Barbara O Rothbaum; Erica J Duncan
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2006 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.460

8.  Repeated extinction and reversal learning of an approach response supports an arousal-mediated learning model.

Authors:  Christopher A Podlesnik; Federico Sanabria
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2010-12-21       Impact factor: 1.777

9.  Perceptual learning and representational learning in humans and animals.

Authors:  József Fiser
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 1.986

10.  Separation of time-based and trial-based accounts of the partial reinforcement extinction effect.

Authors:  Mark E Bouton; Amanda M Woods; Travis P Todd
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2013-08-17       Impact factor: 1.777

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.