Literature DB >> 15278412

Influence of detector collimation on SNR in four different MDCT scanners using a reconstructed slice thickness of 5 mm.

F R Verdun1, A Noel, R Meuli, M Pachoud, P Monnin, J-F Valley, P Schnyder, A Denys.   

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to compare the influence of detector collimation on the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) for a 5.0 mm reconstructed slice thickness for four multi-detector row CT (MDCT) units. SNRs were measured on Catphan test phantom images from four MDCT units: a GE LightSpeed QX/I, a Marconi MX 8000, a Toshiba Aquilion and a Siemens Volume Zoom. Five-millimetre-thick reconstructed slices were obtained from acquisitions performed using detector collimations of 2.0-2.5 mm and 5.0 mm, 120 kV, a 360 degrees tube rotation time of 0.5 s, a wide range of mA and pitch values in the range of 0.75-0.85 and 1.25-1.5. For each set of acquisition parameters, a Wiener spectrum was also calculated. Statistical differences in SNR for the different acquisition parameters were evaluated using a Student's t-test (P<0.05). The influence of detector collimation on the SNR for a 5.0-mm reconstructed slice thickness is different for different MDCT scanners. At pitch values lower than unity, the use of a small detector collimation to produce 5.0-mm thick slices is beneficial for one unit and detrimental for another. At pitch values higher than unity, using a small detector collimation is beneficial for two units. One manufacturer uses different reconstruction filters when switching from a 2.5- to a 5.0-mm detector collimation. For a comparable reconstructed slice thickness, using a smaller detector collimation does not always reduce image noise. Thus, the impact of the detector collimation on image noise should be determined by standard deviation calculations, and also by assessing the power spectra of the noise. Copyright 2004 Springer-Verlag

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15278412     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-004-2420-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  10 in total

1.  Performance evaluation of a multi-slice CT system.

Authors:  C H McCollough; F E Zink
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Four multidetector-row helical CT: image quality and volume coverage speed.

Authors:  H Hu; H D He; W D Foley; S H Fox
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Low-contrast detectability in volume rendering: a phantom study on multidetector-row spiral CT data.

Authors:  Hoen-Oh Shin; Christian V Falck; Michael Galanski
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2003-10-11       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Multi-slice helical CT: scan and reconstruction.

Authors:  H Hu
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Helical CT reconstruction with longitudinal filtration.

Authors:  H Hu; Y Shen
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Dual-slice spiral versus single-slice spiral scanning: comparison of the physical performance of two computed tomography scanners.

Authors:  Y Liang; R A Kruger
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  The effect of helical pitch and beam collimation on the lesion contrast and slice profile in helical CT imaging.

Authors:  H Hu; S H Fox
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  Spiral volumetric CT with single-breath-hold technique, continuous transport, and continuous scanner rotation.

Authors:  W A Kalender; W Seissler; E Klotz; P Vock
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Statistical limitations in x-ray reconstructive tomography.

Authors:  R A Brooks; G Di Chiro
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1976 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.071

10.  Dose reduction in subsecond multislice spiral CT examination of children by online tube current modulation.

Authors:  H Greess; J Lutze; A Nömayr; H Wolf; T Hothorn; W A Kalender; W Bautz
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2004-03-30       Impact factor: 5.315

  10 in total
  3 in total

1.  Impact of the introduction of 16-row MDCT on image quality and patient dose: Phantom study and multi-centre survey.

Authors:  Francis R Verdun; Nicolas Theumann; Pierre-Alexandre Poletti; Daniel Gutierrez; Abbas Aroua; Pierre Schnyder; Jean-François Valley; Salah D Qanadli
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-08-29       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Multidetector computed tomography enteroclysis (MDCT-E) with neutral enteral and IV contrast enhancement in tumor detection.

Authors:  Stefania Romano; Elisabetta De Lutio; Gian Andrea Rollandi; Luigia Romano; Roberto Grassi; Dean D T Maglinte
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-04-07       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Detection of residual tumor after radiofrequency ablation of liver metastasis with dual-modality PET/CT: initial results.

Authors:  Patrick Veit; Gerald Antoch; Hrvoje Stergar; Andreas Bockisch; Michael Forsting; Hilmar Kuehl
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-05-03       Impact factor: 5.315

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.