Literature DB >> 10587202

Performance evaluation of a multi-slice CT system.

C H McCollough1, F E Zink.   

Abstract

Our purpose in this study was to characterize the performance of a recently introduced multi-slice CT scanner (LightSpeed QX/i, Version 1.0, General Electric Medical Systems) in comparison to a single-slice scanner from the same manufacturer (HiSpeed CT/i, Version 4.0). To facilitate this comparison, a refined definition of pitch is introduced which accommodates multi-slice CT systems, yet maintains the existing relationships between pitch, patient dose, and image quality. The following performance parameters were assessed: radiation and slice sensitivity profiles, low-contrast and limiting spatial resolution, image uniformity and noise, CT number and geometric accuracy, and dose. The multi-slice system was tested in axial (1, 2, or 4 images per gantry rotation) and HQ (Pitch = 0.75) and HS (Pitch = 1.5) helical modes. Axial and helical acquisition speed and limiting spatial resolution (0.8-s exposure) were improved on the multi-slice system. Slice sensitivity profiles, image noise, CT number accuracy and uniformity, and low-contrast resolution were similar. In some HS-helical modes, helical artifacts and geometric distortion were more pronounced with a different appearance. Radiation slice profiles and doses were larger on the multi-slice system at all scan widths. For a typical abdomen and pelvis exam, the central and surface body doses for 5-mm helical scans were higher on the multi-slice system by approximately 50%. The increase in surface CTDI values (with respect to the single-slice system) was greatest for the 4 x 1.25-mm detector configuration (190% for head, 240% for body) and least for the 4 x 5-mm configuration (53% for head, 76% for body). Preliminary testing of version 1.1 software demonstrated reduced doses on the multi-slice scanner, where the increase in body surface CTDI values (with respect to the single-slice system) was 105% for the 4 x 1.25-mm detector configuration and 10% for the 4 x 5-mm configuration. In summary, the axial and HQ-helical modes of the multi-slice system provided excellent image quality and a substantial reduction in exam time and tube loading, although at varying degrees of increased dose relative to the single-slice scanner.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10587202     DOI: 10.1118/1.598777

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  50 in total

1.  Comparison of doses for pulmonary embolism detection with helical CT and pulmonary angiography.

Authors:  Arnaud Resten; Franck Mausoleo; M Valero; Dominique Musset
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2002-07-04       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Influence of detector collimation on SNR in four different MDCT scanners using a reconstructed slice thickness of 5 mm.

Authors:  F R Verdun; A Noel; R Meuli; M Pachoud; P Monnin; J-F Valley; P Schnyder; A Denys
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2004-07-27       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  [Current status and future potentials of multislice computed tomography].

Authors:  T Flohr; B Ohnesorge; S Schaller
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 0.635

Review 4.  Multislice computed tomography angiography in the diagnosis of cardiovascular disease: 3D visualizations.

Authors:  Zhonghua Sun
Journal:  Front Med       Date:  2011-10-02       Impact factor: 4.592

5.  Multislice CT angiography in coronary artery disease: Technical developments, radiation dose and diagnostic value.

Authors:  Zhonghua Sun
Journal:  World J Cardiol       Date:  2010-10-26

6.  Radiation dose reduction in computed tomography: techniques and future perspective.

Authors:  Lifeng Yu; Xin Liu; Shuai Leng; James M Kofler; Juan C Ramirez-Giraldo; Mingliang Qu; Jodie Christner; Joel G Fletcher; Cynthia H McCollough
Journal:  Imaging Med       Date:  2009-10

7.  Improved pelvicalyceal visualization with multidetector computed tomography urography; comparison with helical computed tomography.

Authors:  V Raptopoulos; A McNamara
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-03-11       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 8.  Techniques and parameters for estimating radiation exposure and dose in cardiac computed tomography.

Authors:  Thomas C Gerber; Ronald S Kuzo; Richard L Morin
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 9.  Cross-sectional vascular imaging with CT and MR angiography.

Authors:  Hasan K Kabul; Klaus D Hagspiel
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2006 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 10.  Estimating radiation risk from computed tomography scanning.

Authors:  Vadim Fayngersh; Michael Passero
Journal:  Lung       Date:  2009-04-07       Impact factor: 2.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.