Literature DB >> 15273108

Relationship between triclosan and susceptibilities of bacteria isolated from hands in the community.

Allison E Aiello1, Bonnie Marshall, Stuart B Levy, Phyllis Della-Latta, Elaine Larson.   

Abstract

The possible association between triclosan and bacterial susceptibility to antibiotic was examined among staphylococci and several species of gram-negative bacteria (GNB) isolated from the hands of individuals in a community setting. Hand cultures from individuals randomized to using either antibacterial cleaning and hygiene products (including a hand soap containing 0.2% triclosan) or nonantibacterial cleaning and hygiene products for a 1-year period were taken at baseline and at the end of the year. Although there was no statistically significant association between triclosan MICs and susceptibility to antibiotic, there was an increasing trend in the association the odds ratios (ORs) for all species were compared at baseline (OR = 0.65, 95% confidence interval [95%CI] = 0.33 to 1.27) versus at the end of the year (OR = 1.08, 95%CI = 0.62 to 1.97) and for GNB alone at baseline(OR = 0.66, 95%CI = 0.29 to 1.51) versus the end of year (OR = 2.69, 95%CI = 0.78 to 9.23) regardless of the hand-washing product used. Moreover, triclosan MICs were higher in some of the species compared to earlier reports on household, clinical, and industrial isolates, and some of these isolates had triclosan MICs in the range of concentrations used in consumer products. The absence of a statistically significant association between elevated triclosan MICs and reduced antibiotic susceptibility may indicate that such a correlation does not exist or that it is relatively small among the isolates that were studied. Still, a relationship may emerge after longer-term or higher-dose exposure of bacteria to triclosan in the community setting.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15273108      PMCID: PMC478530          DOI: 10.1128/AAC.48.8.2973-2979.2004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother        ISSN: 0066-4804            Impact factor:   5.191


  37 in total

1.  Pharmaceuticals, hormones, and other organic wastewater contaminants in U.S. streams, 1999-2000: a national reconnaissance.

Authors:  Dana W Kolpin; Edward T Furlong; Michael T Meyer; E Michael Thurman; Steven D Zaugg; Larry B Barber; Herbert T Buxton
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2002-03-15       Impact factor: 9.028

2.  Biocide abuse and antimicrobial resistance: being clear about the issues.

Authors:  Peter Gilbert; Andrew J McBain; Sally F Bloomfield
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 5.790

Review 3.  Potential impact of increased use of biocides in consumer products on prevalence of antibiotic resistance.

Authors:  Peter Gilbert; Andrew J McBain
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 26.132

4.  Soil bacteria Pseudomonas putida and Alcaligenes xylosoxidans subsp. denitrificans inactivate triclosan in liquid and solid substrates.

Authors:  M J Meade; R L Waddell; T M Callahan
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Lett       Date:  2001-10-16       Impact factor: 2.742

5.  The enoyl-[acyl-carrier-protein] reductases FabI and FabL from Bacillus subtilis.

Authors:  R J Heath; N Su; C K Murphy; C O Rock
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2000-12-22       Impact factor: 5.157

6.  Inhibition of InhA, the enoyl reductase from Mycobacterium tuberculosis, by triclosan and isoniazid.

Authors:  S L Parikh; G Xiao; P J Tonge
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2000-07-04       Impact factor: 3.162

7.  Occurrence and environmental behavior of the bactericide triclosan and its methyl derivative in surface waters and in wastewater.

Authors:  Anton Lindström; Ignaz J Buerge; Thomas Poiger; Per-Anders Bergqvist; Markus D Müller; Hans-Rudolf Buser
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2002-06-01       Impact factor: 9.028

8.  Investigation of antibiotic and antibacterial agent cross-resistance in target bacteria from homes of antibacterial product users and nonusers.

Authors:  E C Cole; R M Addison; J R Rubino; K E Leese; P D Dulaney; M S Newell; J Wilkins; D J Gaber; T Wineinger; D A Criger
Journal:  J Appl Microbiol       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 3.772

9.  Triclosan: occurrence and fate of a widely used biocide in the aquatic environment: field measurements in wastewater treatment plants, surface waters, and lake sediments.

Authors:  Heinz Singer; Stephan Müller; Céline Tixier; Laurent Pillonel
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2002-12-01       Impact factor: 9.028

10.  The MexJK efflux pump of Pseudomonas aeruginosa requires OprM for antibiotic efflux but not for efflux of triclosan.

Authors:  Rungtip Chuanchuen; Craig T Narasaki; Herbert P Schweizer
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 3.490

View more
  21 in total

1.  The frequency of antibiotic-resistant bacteria in homes differing in their use of surface antibacterial agents.

Authors:  Bonnie M Marshall; Eduardo Robleto; Theresa Dumont; Stuart B Levy
Journal:  Curr Microbiol       Date:  2012-07-03       Impact factor: 2.188

2.  Use of antibacterial consumer products containing quaternary ammonium compounds and drug resistance in the community.

Authors:  Robyn T Carson; Elaine Larson; Stuart B Levy; Bonnie M Marshall; Allison E Aiello
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2008-08-11       Impact factor: 5.790

3.  Development of a protocol for predicting bacterial resistance to microbicides.

Authors:  Laura Knapp; Alejandro Amézquita; Peter McClure; Sara Stewart; Jean-Yves Maillard
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2015-01-30       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 4.  Occurrence and toxicity of antimicrobial triclosan and by-products in the environment.

Authors:  Gilles Bedoux; Benoit Roig; Olivier Thomas; Virginie Dupont; Barbara Le Bot
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2011-11-05       Impact factor: 4.223

5.  Healthcare associated infection: novel strategies and antimicrobial implants to prevent surgical site infection.

Authors:  David Leaper; Andrew J McBain; Axel Kramer; Ojan Assadian; Jose Luis Alfonso Sanchez; Jukka Lumio; Martin Kiernan
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 1.891

Review 6.  Antimicrobial sutures and prevention of surgical site infection: assessment of the safety of the antiseptic triclosan.

Authors:  David Leaper; Ojan Assadian; Nils-Olaf Hubner; Andrew McBain; Thomas Barbolt; Stephen Rothenburger; Peter Wilson
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2011-08-19       Impact factor: 3.315

7.  Triclosan antagonizes fluconazole activity against Candida albicans.

Authors:  J Higgins; E Pinjon; H N Oltean; T C White; S L Kelly; C M Martel; D J Sullivan; D C Coleman; G P Moran
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2011-10-04       Impact factor: 6.116

8.  Characterization of triclosan-resistant mutants reveals multiple antimicrobial resistance mechanisms in Rhodospirillum rubrum S1H.

Authors:  Benny F G Pycke; Aurélie Crabbé; Willy Verstraete; Natalie Leys
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2010-03-19       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 9.  Triclosan: A Widespread Environmental Toxicant with Many Biological Effects.

Authors:  Mei-Fei Yueh; Robert H Tukey
Journal:  Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 13.820

Review 10.  Diversity in enoyl-acyl carrier protein reductases.

Authors:  R P Massengo-Tiassé; J E Cronan
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 9.261

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.