Literature DB >> 15271867

Reliability of comparative genomic hybridization to detect chromosome abnormalities in first polar bodies and metaphase II oocytes.

Cristina Gutiérrez-Mateo1, Dagan Wells, Jordi Benet, Jorge F Sánchez-García, Mercedes G Bermúdez, Itziar Belil, Josep Egozcue, Santiago Munné, Joaquima Navarro.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis (PGD) using FISH to analyze up to nine chromosomes to discard chromosomally abnormal embryos has resulted in an increase of pregnancy rates in certain groups of patients. However, the number of chromosomes that can be analyzed is a clear limitation. We evaluate the reliability of using comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) to detect the whole set of chromosomes, as an alternative to PGD using FISH. METHODS AND
RESULTS: We have analysed by CGH both, first polar bodies (1PBs) and metaphase II (MII) oocytes from 30 oocytes donated by 24 women. The aneuploidy rate was 48%. Considering two maternal age groups, a higher number of chromosome abnormalities were detected in the older group of oocytes (23% versus 75%, P < 0.02). About 33% of the 1PB-MII oocyte doublets diagnosed as aneuploid by CGH would have been misdiagnosed as normal if FISH with nine chromosome probes had been used.
CONCLUSION: We demonstrate the reliability of 1PB analysis by CGH, to detect almost any chromosome abnormality in oocytes as well as unbalanced segregations of maternal translocations in a time frame compatible with regular in vitro fertilization (IVF). The selection of euploid oocytes could help to increase implantation and pregnancy rates of patients undergoing IVF treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15271867     DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deh367

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


  9 in total

Review 1.  Dynamic changes in gene expression during human early embryo development: from fundamental aspects to clinical applications.

Authors:  Said Assou; Imène Boumela; Delphine Haouzi; Tal Anahory; Hervé Dechaud; John De Vos; Samir Hamamah
Journal:  Hum Reprod Update       Date:  2010-08-17       Impact factor: 15.610

Review 2.  The cytogenetics of preimplantation human development: insights provided by traditional and novel techniques.

Authors:  Helen G Tempest; Darren K Griffin
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2005-10-15       Impact factor: 4.316

3.  Polar body diagnosis - a step in the right direction?

Authors:  Katrin van der Ven; Markus Montag; Hans van der Ven
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2008-03-14       Impact factor: 5.594

Review 4.  Preimplantation genetic screening: does it help or hinder IVF treatment and what is the role of the embryo?

Authors:  Kim Dao Ly; Ashok Agarwal; Zsolt Peter Nagy
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2011-07-09       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 5.  A review of, and commentary on, the ongoing second clinical introduction of preimplantation genetic screening (PGS) to routine IVF practice.

Authors:  Norbert Gleicher; David H Barad
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2012-10-05       Impact factor: 3.412

6.  Non-meiotic chromosome instability in human immature oocytes.

Authors:  Gemma Daina; Laia Ramos; Mariona Rius; Albert Obradors; Javier Del Rey; Magda Giralt; Mercedes Campillo; Esther Velilla; Aïda Pujol; Olga Martinez-Pasarell; Jordi Benet; Joaquima Navarro
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2013-05-22       Impact factor: 4.246

7.  A study of meiotic segregation in a fertile human population following ovarian stimulation with recombinant FSH-LH.

Authors:  Esther Velilla; Silvia F Fernández; Jordi Suñol; Marisa López-Teijón
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2013-01-10       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 8.  Methods for comprehensive chromosome screening of oocytes and embryos: capabilities, limitations, and evidence of validity.

Authors:  Nathan R Treff; Richard T Scott
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2012-03-14       Impact factor: 3.412

9.  Single-cell chromosomal imbalances detection by array CGH.

Authors:  Cedric Le Caignec; Claudia Spits; Karen Sermon; Martine De Rycke; Bernard Thienpont; Sophie Debrock; Catherine Staessen; Yves Moreau; Jean-Pierre Fryns; Andre Van Steirteghem; Inge Liebaers; Joris R Vermeesch
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2006-05-12       Impact factor: 16.971

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.