Literature DB >> 15268007

Many-body force field models based solely on pairwise Coulomb screening do not simultaneously reproduce correct gas-phase and condensed-phase polarizability limits.

Timothy J Giese1, Darrin M York.   

Abstract

It is demonstrated that many-body force field models based solely on pairwise Coulomb screening cannot simultaneously reproduce both gas-phase and condensed-phase polarizability limits. Several many-body force field model forms are tested and compared with basis set-corrected ab initio results for a series of bifurcated water chains. Models are parameterized to reproduce the ab initio polarizability of an isolated water molecule, and pairwise damping functions are set to reproduce the polarizability of a water dimer as a function of dimer separation. When these models are applied to extended water chains, the polarization is over-predicted, and this over-polarization increased as a function of the overlap of molecular orbitals as the chains are compressed. This suggests that polarizable models based solely on pairwise Coulomb screening have some limitations, and that coupling with non-classical many-body effects, in particular exchange terms, may be important. (c) 2004 American Institute of Physics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15268007     DOI: 10.1063/1.1756583

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Phys        ISSN: 0021-9606            Impact factor:   3.488


  14 in total

Review 1.  Integrated Modeling Program, Applied Chemical Theory (IMPACT).

Authors:  Jay L Banks; Hege S Beard; Yixiang Cao; Art E Cho; Wolfgang Damm; Ramy Farid; Anthony K Felts; Thomas A Halgren; Daniel T Mainz; Jon R Maple; Robert Murphy; Dean M Philipp; Matthew P Repasky; Linda Y Zhang; Bruce J Berne; Richard A Friesner; Emilio Gallicchio; Ronald M Levy
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 3.376

2.  Gaussian induced dipole polarization model.

Authors:  Dennis Elking; Tom Darden; Robert J Woods
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 3.376

3.  Origin and control of superlinear polarizability scaling in chemical potential equalization methods.

Authors:  G Lee Warren; Joseph E Davis; Sandeep Patel
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2008-04-14       Impact factor: 3.488

4.  Ab initio parameterization of YFF1, a universal force field for drug-design applications.

Authors:  Olexandr Ya Yakovenko; Yvonne Y Li; Alexander A Oliferenko; Ganna M Vashchenko; Volodymyr G Bdzhola; Steven J M Jones
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2011-05-12       Impact factor: 1.810

5.  Perspective: Quantum mechanical methods in biochemistry and biophysics.

Authors:  Qiang Cui
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2016-10-14       Impact factor: 3.488

6.  Intermolecular interactions in the condensed phase: Evaluation of semi-empirical quantum mechanical methods.

Authors:  Anders S Christensen; Jimmy C Kromann; Jan H Jensen; Qiang Cui
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2017-10-28       Impact factor: 3.488

7.  Polarizable Empirical Force Field for Halogen-Containing Compounds Based on the Classical Drude Oscillator.

Authors:  Fang-Yu Lin; Alexander D MacKerell
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2018-01-31       Impact factor: 6.006

8.  Polarizable Atomic Multipole-based Molecular Mechanics for Organic Molecules.

Authors:  Pengyu Ren; Chuanjie Wu; Jay W Ponder
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2011-10-11       Impact factor: 6.006

9.  Polarizability rescaling and atom-based Thole scaling in the CHARMM Drude polarizable force field for ethers.

Authors:  Christopher M Baker; Alexander D Mackerell
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2009-08-25       Impact factor: 1.810

Review 10.  An Empirical Polarizable Force Field Based on the Classical Drude Oscillator Model: Development History and Recent Applications.

Authors:  Justin A Lemkul; Jing Huang; Benoît Roux; Alexander D MacKerell
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2016-01-27       Impact factor: 60.622

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.