Literature DB >> 15266379

Pleiotropy and the genomic location of sexually selected genes.

Mark J Fitzpatrick1.   

Abstract

Sexual selection drives the evolution of traits involved in the competition for mates. Although considerable research has focused on the evolution of sexually selected traits, their underlying genetic architecture is poorly resolved. Here I address the pleiotropic effects and genomic locations of sexually selected genes. These two important characteristics can impose considerable constraints on evolvability and may influence our understanding of the process of sexual selection. Theoretical models are inconsistent regarding the genomic location of sexually selected genes. Models that do not incorporate pleiotropic effects often predict sex linkage. Conversely, sex linkage is not explicitly predicted by the condition-dependent model (which considers pleiotropic effects). Evidence largely based on reciprocal crosses supports the notion of sex linkage. However, although they infer genetic contribution, reciprocal crosses cannot identify the genes or their pleiotropic effects. By surveying the genome of Drosophila melanogaster, I provide evidence for the genomic location and pleiotropic effects of 63 putatively sexually selected genes. Interestingly, most are pleiotropic (73%), and they are not preferentially sex linked. Their pleiotropic effects include fertility, development, life span, and viability, which may contribute to condition and/or fitness. My findings may also provide evidence for the capture of genetic variation in condition via the pleiotropic effects of sexually selected genes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15266379     DOI: 10.1086/386297

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Nat        ISSN: 0003-0147            Impact factor:   3.926


  19 in total

1.  The existence of species rests on a metastable equilibrium between inbreeding and outbreeding. An essay on the close relationship between speciation, inbreeding and recessive mutations.

Authors:  Etienne Joly
Journal:  Biol Direct       Date:  2011-12-09       Impact factor: 4.540

2.  Heritability and genetic correlation between the sexes in a songbird sexual ornament.

Authors:  J Potti; D Canal
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2010-11-17       Impact factor: 3.821

3.  Sex linkage, sex-specific selection, and the role of recombination in the evolution of sexually dimorphic gene expression.

Authors:  Tim Connallon; Andrew G Clark
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2010-11-03       Impact factor: 3.694

Review 4.  Maintenance of genetic variation in sexual ornaments: a review of the mechanisms.

Authors:  Jacek Radwan
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2007-09-15       Impact factor: 1.082

5.  Sex chromosomes and male ornaments: a comparative evaluation in ray-finned fishes.

Authors:  Judith E Mank; David W Hall; Mark Kirkpatrick; John C Avise
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2006-01-22       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Pervasive sex-linked effects on transcription regulation as revealed by expression quantitative trait loci mapping in lake whitefish species pairs (Coregonus sp., Salmonidae).

Authors:  N Derome; B Bougas; S M Rogers; A R Whiteley; A Labbe; J Laroche; L Bernatchez
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2008-07-27       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Natural genetic variation in cuticular hydrocarbon expression in male and female Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Brad Foley; Stephen F Chenoweth; Sergey V Nuzhdin; Mark W Blows
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2006-12-28       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Transcriptomics analysis revealing candidate networks and genes for the body size sexual dimorphism of Chinese tongue sole (Cynoglossus semilaevis).

Authors:  Na Wang; Renkai Wang; Ruoqing Wang; Songlin Chen
Journal:  Funct Integr Genomics       Date:  2018-03-12       Impact factor: 3.410

9.  An XX/XY sex microchromosome system in a freshwater turtle, Chelodina longicollis (Testudines: Chelidae) with genetic sex determination.

Authors:  Tariq Ezaz; Nicole Valenzuela; Frank Grützner; Ikuo Miura; Arthur Georges; Russell L Burke; Jennifer A Marshall Graves
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2006-03-17       Impact factor: 5.239

10.  Age, but not experience, affects courtship gene expression in male Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Ruedi; Kimberly A Hughes
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-07-07       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.