Literature DB >> 15264655

In vitro evaluation of shear bond strengths and in vivo analysis of bond survival of indirect-bonding resins.

Omur Polat1, Ali Ihya Karaman, Tamer Buyukyilmaz.   

Abstract

In this study we evaluate the shear bond strengths (SBS) of indirect-bonding systems available on the market. For the in vitro study, 60 extracted premolars were divided into three groups. In indirect group I, the brackets were bonded to models using Therma Cure laboratory resin and transferred to the teeth using Custom IQ resin for indirect bonding. For indirect group II, the teeth were attached to models using Transbond XT and transferred using Sondhi Rapid Set. In the direct-bonding group, the brackets were bonded to teeth directly using Transbond XT The SBS were evaluated, and the comparisons were made. In the in vivo study, left half of the upper arch and right half of the lower arch were bonded using Sondhi's indirect-bonding resin and right half of the upper arch and left half of the lower arch were bonded using Therma Cure as a laboratory resin and Custom IQ as a clinical bonding resin. The failure rates of the brackets were followed for nine months. Analysis of variance and Tukey tests were performed. Mean SBS values (MPa) were 10.3 +/- 4.2, 6.1 +/- 1.6, and 12.8 +/- 5.4 for the indirect groups I and II and for the direct-bonding group, respectively. There were no significant differences between indirect group I and direct group (P > .05), whereas both yielded significantly higher SBS values compared with indirect group II. In vivo bond survival evaluation showed no differences between the two indirect-bonding systems available.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15264655     DOI: 10.1043/0003-3219(2004)074<0405:IVEOSB>2.0.CO;2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Angle Orthod        ISSN: 0003-3219            Impact factor:   2.079


  8 in total

Review 1.  Indirect Bonding Revisited.

Authors:  Hande Pamukçu; Ömür Polat Özsoy
Journal:  Turk J Orthod       Date:  2016-09-01

2.  Single-component orthodontic adhesives: comparison of the clinical and in vitro performance.

Authors:  Ufuk Ok; Sertac Aksakalli; Elif Eren; Nourtzan Kechagia
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2021-01-06       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  Force and amount of resin composite paste used in direct and indirect bonding.

Authors:  Takeshi Muguruma; Yoshitaka Yasuda; Masahiro Iijima; Naohisa Kohda; Itaru Mizoguchi
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 2.079

4.  Effect of adhesion boosters on indirect bracket bonding.

Authors:  Lylian Kazumi Kanashiro; Julissa Janet Robles-Ruíz; Ana Lidia Ciamponi; Igor Studart Medeiros; Gladys Cristina Dominguez; Solange Mongelli de Fantini
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2013-07-08       Impact factor: 2.079

5.  Comparison of Shear Bond Strength of Orthodontic Brackets Using Direct and Indirect Bonding Methods in Vitro and in Vivo.

Authors:  Kenan Demirovic; Martina Slaj; Stjepan Spalj; Mladen Slaj; Sedin Kobaslija
Journal:  Acta Inform Med       Date:  2018-06

6.  In Vitro Study of Shear Bond Strength in Direct and Indirect Bonding with Three Types of Adhesive Systems.

Authors:  Angelica Iglesias; Teresa Flores; Javier Moyano; Montserrat Artés; Francisco Javier Gil; Andreu Puigdollers
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2020-06-10       Impact factor: 3.623

7.  Effects of different primers on indirect orthodontic bonding: Shear bond strength, color change, and enamel roughness.

Authors:  Mirella Lemos Queiróz Tavares; Carlos Nelson Elias; Lincoln Issamu Nojima
Journal:  Korean J Orthod       Date:  2018-07-06       Impact factor: 1.372

Review 8.  The Indirect Bonding Technique in Orthodontics-A Narrative Literature Review.

Authors:  Agnieszka Nawrocka; Monika Lukomska-Szymanska
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2020-02-22       Impact factor: 3.623

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.