Literature DB >> 1526242

Evaluation of two rapid tests for the diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis genital infections.

H H Schubiner1, W D LeBar, S Joseph, C Taylor, C Jemal.   

Abstract

The performance of two new enzyme immunoassays (EIA) for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in a practice setting was compared. A consecutive series of 207 female patients seen at an inner-city sexually transmitted disease clinic were tested by cell culture, the Kodak SureCell (SC) and Abbott TestPack Chlamydia (TP) EIAs. In addition 210 male patients, selected by physicians on the basis of the fact that multiple urethral samples could be obtained, were tested by cell culture and SC. The prevalence of infection was 19% in the females and 12.5% in males. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value for the SC and TP were 88%, 95%, 81%, 97% and 59%, 99%, 95%, 91%, respectively, in the female population. The sensitivity of the SC was significantly greater than that of the TP (p less than or equal to 0.002). The performance values of the SC in men (in the same order) were 64%, 96%, 71% and 95%, respectively. The SC in male patients and the TP in female patients had low sensitivity. The sensitivity of the SC in female patients was significantly higher than that of the TP. However, the SC yielded more false positive results. To determine the utility of these tests in a practice setting further studies are required.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1526242     DOI: 10.1007/bf01960814

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis        ISSN: 0934-9723            Impact factor:   3.267


  17 in total

1.  Comparison of DNA probe, monoclonal antibody enzyme immunoassay, and cell culture for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis.

Authors:  W LeBar; B Herschman; C Jemal; J Pierzchala
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Comparison of IDEIA III and cell culture for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in endocervical specimens.

Authors:  W D Lebar; H Schubiner; C Jemal; B R Herschman
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Why we need a program for the control of Chlamydia trachomatis.

Authors:  J Schachter
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1989-03-23       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Establishing a physician's office laboratory.

Authors:  K James; D A Barrett
Journal:  Med Clin North Am       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 5.456

5.  Regulatory and legal influences on physicians' office laboratories.

Authors:  R F Wildermann; K A Schneider
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1986-07-11       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Evaluation of Abbott Testpack Chlamydia for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in patients attending sexually transmitted diseases clinics.

Authors:  C A Reichart; C A Gaydos; W E Brady; T C Quinn; E W Hook
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  1990 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.830

7.  TestPack Chlamydia, a new rapid assay for the direct detection of Chlamydia trachomatis.

Authors:  P Coleman; V Varitek; I K Mushahwar; B Marchlewicz; J Safford; J Hansen; G Kurpiewski; T Grier
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis antigens by enzyme immunoassay and immunofluorescence in genital specimens from symptomatic and asymptomatic men and women.

Authors:  M A Chernesky; J B Mahony; S Castriciano; M Mores; I O Stewart; S J Landis; W Seidelman; E J Sargeant; C Leman
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  1986-07       Impact factor: 5.226

Review 9.  Diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis genitourinary infections.

Authors:  W E Stamm
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 25.391

10.  Chlamydia and the adolescent girl. The enzyme immunoassay as a screening tool.

Authors:  K Soren; E Willis
Journal:  Am J Dis Child       Date:  1989-01
View more
  3 in total

1.  Impact of reference standard sensitivity on accuracy of rapid antigen detection assays and a leukocyte esterase dipstick for diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis infection in first-void urine specimens from men.

Authors:  M Chernesky; D Jang; J Krepel; J Sellors; J Mahony
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 2.  Current methods of laboratory diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis infections.

Authors:  C M Black
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 26.132

3.  Rapid antigen detection assay for identification of Chlamydia trachomatis infection.

Authors:  B Van der Pol; J A Williams; R B Jones
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 5.948

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.