Literature DB >> 15262233

Positron emission tomography versus positron emission tomography/computed tomography: from "unclear" to "new-clear" medicine.

Gustav K von Schulthess1.   

Abstract

PET/CT is a new diagnostic imaging modality, which proves that adding PET and CT is not merely additive, but highly synergistic. While PET provides high sensitivity for lesion detection, CT provides the anatomic backdrop, which frequently is important in order to make a specific diagnosis. CT can, however, also add sensitivity to PET, as certain lesions such as small clearly pathological lung nodules may not at all be visualized on PET alone; and PET clearly adds specificity to CT because, e.g., indeterminate lymph nodes seen on CT can often be diagnosed unequivocally as benign or malignant, using PET information. Furthermore, attenuation correction of PET data, which is needed for best PET image quality, can also be obtained using the same CT data. Hence, PET/CT also provides a very fast solution for obtaining attenuation images. The major clinical applications of PET/CT are in tumor imaging of the body and the search for inflammatory foci, while for brain imaging, PET/CT is less relevant. In the brain, post acquisition fusion of PET and MRI data is relatively easy, while post acquisition fusion of PET and CT or MR data in the body is unreliable and cumbersome. We strongly feel that PET/CT is the oncological staging "one-stop-shop" examination of the future for many tumors. The key question in the next few years will be how much CT is needed in PET/CT for which clinical question? The advent of ever faster CT scanners suggests that PET/CT eventually may also provide a tool for a cardiac "one-stop-shop." So the future of PET/CT indeed looks bright.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15262233     DOI: 10.1016/j.mibio.2004.05.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol        ISSN: 1536-1632            Impact factor:   3.488


  8 in total

1.  Acceptance testing for nuclear medicine instrumentation.

Authors:  Ellinor Busemann Sokole; Anna Płachcínska; Alan Britten
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 9.236

2.  Routine quality control recommendations for nuclear medicine instrumentation.

Authors:  Ellinor Busemann Sokole; Anna Płachcínska; Alan Britten; Maria Lyra Georgosopoulou; Wendy Tindale; Rigobert Klett
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 9.236

3.  Implementation of an automated respiratory amplitude gating technique for PET/CT: clinical evaluation.

Authors:  Guoping Chang; Tingting Chang; Tinsu Pan; John W Clark; Osama R Mawlawi
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2009-12-15       Impact factor: 10.057

Review 4.  Role and cost effectiveness of PET/CT in management of patients with cancer.

Authors:  Muhammad Wasif Saif; Ifigenia Tzannou; Nektaria Makrilia; Kostas Syrigos
Journal:  Yale J Biol Med       Date:  2010-06

5.  Incremental value of integrated FDG-PET/CT in evaluating indeterminate solitary pulmonary nodule for malignancy.

Authors:  Chih-Yung Chang; Ching Tzao; Shih-Chun Lee; Cheng-Yi Cheng; Chang-Hsien Liu; Wen-Sheng Huang; Chih-Hung Ku; Jong-Kang Lee; Ching-Yee Oliver Wong
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2009-06-20       Impact factor: 3.488

6.  Is PET-CT the only option?

Authors:  Abass Alavi; Ayse Mavi; Sandip Basu; Alan Fischman
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 10.057

7.  Microvessel density and p53 in detecting cervical cancer by FDG PET in cases of suspected recurrence.

Authors:  Astrid A M van der Veldt; Lotty Hooft; Paul J van Diest; Johannes Berkhof; Marrije R Buist; Emile F I Comans; Otto S Hoekstra; Carla F M Molthoff
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2006-07-14       Impact factor: 10.057

8.  (18)F-FDG PET versus (18)F-FDG PET/CT for adrenal gland lesion characterization: a comparison of diagnostic efficacy in lung cancer patients.

Authors:  Yon Mi Sung; Kyung Soo Lee; Byung Tae Kim; Joon Young Choi; Myung Jin Chung; Young Mog Shim; Chin A Yi; Tae Sung Kim
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2008 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.500

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.