Literature DB >> 15257852

Integrating preventive health services within community health centers: lessons from WISEWOMAN.

Glen P Mays1, Heather A Hesketh, Alice S Ammerman, Chris K Stockmyer, Tamara Lewis Johnson, Marcia Bayne-Smith.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Well-Integrated Screening and Evaluation for Women Across the Nation (WISEWOMAN) provides low-income, underserved women ages 40-64 with risk factor screening and lifestyle intervention and referral services to prevent cardiovascular disease (CVD). Integrating WISEWOMAN's services with the culturally appropriate medical care and support services offered by community health centers may improve the program's ability to reduce CVD burden among underserved women.
METHODS: We conducted a formative assessment of the perceived opportunities, challenges, and strategies associated with integrating WISEWOMAN into community health center settings. A panel of stakeholders that included health center and WISEWOMAN representatives was convened in 2002, and a semistructured discussion guide was used to elicit perspectives about integration. We also conducted an in-depth review of WISEWOMAN's history of collaboration with health centers in North Carolina.
RESULTS: Stakeholders perceived a clear need for integrating WISEWOMAN within health center settings, indicating that centers have few other resources to expand preventive services delivery and offer effective lifestyle interventions for underserved populations. Perceived barriers to integration included competing demands on health center resources, difficulties hiring staff for new programs, and administrative burdens associated with data collection and reporting. Experiences within North Carolina's WISEWOMAN project demonstrate, however, that lifestyle interventions can be designed in ways that facilitate integration by health centers.
CONCLUSIONS: Integration strategies need to be tailored to the resources, skills, and capacities available within health centers. As health centers and WISEWOMAN projects gain more experience in collaborating, additional research should be conducted to identify how best to achieve integration within specific institutional and community contexts.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15257852     DOI: 10.1089/1540999041281070

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)        ISSN: 1540-9996            Impact factor:   2.681


  4 in total

1.  Lessons learned from building an infrastructure for community-engaged research.

Authors:  Calpurnyia B Roberts; Ruth Browne; Tracey E Wilson; Kweli Rashied-Henry; Nicole Primus; Raphael Shaw; Humberto Brown; Ferdinand Zizi; Girardin Jean-Louis; Clinton Brown; Yvonne Graham; Marilyn Fraser-White
Journal:  Int Public Health J       Date:  2013

2.  An Investigation of the Association between Health Screening and Dental Scaling in Korea.

Authors:  Bo-Mi Shin; Jung-Sun Heo; Jae-In Ryu
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-04-18       Impact factor: 3.390

3.  "Should I and can I?" A mixed methods study of clinician beliefs and attitudes in the management of lifestyle risk factors in primary health care.

Authors:  Rachel A Laws; Sue E Kirby; Gawaine P Powell Davies; Anna M Williams; Upali W Jayasinghe; Cheryl L Amoroso; Mark F Harris
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2008-02-26       Impact factor: 2.655

4.  The provision of NHS health checks in a community setting: an ethnographic account.

Authors:  Ruth Riley; Nikki Coghill; Alan Montgomery; Gene Feder; Jeremy Horwood
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2015-12-10       Impact factor: 2.655

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.