Literature DB >> 15257632

Oral sodium phosphate solution: a review of its use as a colorectal cleanser.

Monique P Curran1, Greg L Plosker.   

Abstract

Oral sodium phosphate solution (Fleet Phospho-soda, Casen-Fleet Fosfosoda is a low-volume, hyperosmotic agent used as part of a colorectal-cleansing preparation for surgery, x-ray or endoscopic examination. The efficacy and tolerability of oral sodium phosphate solution was generally similar to, or significantly better than, that of polyethylene glycol (PEG) or other colorectal cleansing regimens in patients preparing for colonoscopy, colorectal surgery or other colorectal-related procedures. Generally, oral sodium phosphate solution was significantly more acceptable to patients than PEG or other regimens. The use of this solution should be considered in most patients (with the exception of those with contraindications) requiring colorectal cleansing. PHARMACOLOGICAL PROPERTIES: After the first and second 45 mL dose of oral sodium phosphate solution, the mean time to onset of bowel activity was 1.7 and 0.7 hours and the mean duration of activity was 4.6 and 2.9 hours. Bowel activity ceased within 4 hours of administration of the second dose in 83% of patients. Elevations in serum phosphorus and falls in serum total and ionised calcium from baseline occurred during the 24 hours after administration of oral sodium phosphate solution in seven healthy volunteers. These changes were not associated with significant changes in clinical assessments. The decrease in serum potassium levels after administration of oral sodium phosphate solution was negatively correlated with baseline intracellular potassium levels. THERAPEUTIC USE: A regimen that administered the first dose of sodium phosphate on the previous evening and a second dose on the morning of the procedure (10-12 hours apart) was significantly more effective than PEG-based regimens for colorectal cleansing in preparation for colonoscopy, sigmoidoscopy or colorectal surgery. A regimen that administered both doses of oral sodium phosphate on the day prior to the procedure offered no colorectal cleansing advantage over PEG-based regimens and was significantly less effective than an oral sodium phosphate solution regimen that administered one dose on the previous evening and a second dose on the morning of the procedure. Oral sodium phosphate solution was generally as effective as other colorectal cleansing solutions (including magnesium citrate-containing regimens with sodium picosulfate). The direct costs of a diagnostic colonic examination with oral sodium phosphate solution were less than those with PEG (US465 dollars vs US503 dollars per patient; 1995 values), according to data from a US study. Oral sodium phosphate solution was significantly more effective than a commercially available tablet formulation as a colorectal cleanser prior to colonoscopy (data from one study only). TOLERABILITY: Oral sodium phosphate solution administered as two 45 mL doses (generally 10-12 hours apart) was well tolerated in well designed trials in which adults with major comorbid conditions were excluded. Sodium phosphate-associated adverse events were mostly gastrointestinal (including abdominal pain/cramping, abdominal fullness and/or bloating, anal or perianal irritation or soreness, nausea, vomiting or hunger pains), although dizziness, weakness/fatigue, thirst, chest pain, chills, headache and sleep loss were also reported. Faecal incontinence was commonly reported in the elderly. Three doses (administered 10 minutes apart) of 15 mL of oral sodium phosphate solution, each diluted in 250 mL of clear fluid was associated with less vomiting than one 45 mL dose of the solution diluted in 250 mL of clear fluid (data from one study). In patients without major comorbid conditions, oral sodium phosphate has been associated with transient and clinically inconsequential changes in intravascular volume and electrolyte disturbances. Serious electrolyte disturbances have been associated with oral sodium phosphate administration in patients in whom sodium phosphate is contraindicated or should be use with caution (the elderly and those with bowel obstructions, small intestinal disorders, poor gut motilderly and those with bowel obstructions, small intestinal disorders, poor gut motility, renal insufficiency, cardiovascular disease or taking concomitant medication) or in patients ingesting more than the recommended dosage. Changes in the colonic mucosa have been reported in patients treated with oral sodium phosphate solution; however, the exact role of this agent in the appearance of these changes has not been fully clarified. The tolerability profile of oral sodium phosphate solution was similar to, or significantly better than, that of PEG or other colorectal cleansing regimens. Oral sodium phosphate solution was generally significantly more acceptable than PEG or other colorectal cleansing regimens. Oral sodium phosphate solution had similar tolerability, but was considered to be more acceptable than commercially available oral sodium phosphate tablets prior to colonoscopy (data from one study).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15257632     DOI: 10.2165/00003495-200464150-00009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Drugs        ISSN: 0012-6667            Impact factor:   9.546


  75 in total

Review 1.  Fatal hyperphosphatemia following Fleet Phospo-Soda in a patient with colonic ileus.

Authors:  R Fass; S Do; L J Hixson
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 10.864

2.  Postoperative hypocalcemic tetany caused by fleet phospho-soda preparation in a patient taking alendronate sodium: report of a case.

Authors:  P Campisi; V Badhwar; S Morin; J L Trudel
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 4.585

3.  Factors affecting insertion time and patient discomfort during colonoscopy.

Authors:  W H Kim; Y J Cho; J Y Park; P K Min; J K Kang; I S Park
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 9.427

4.  Two liters of polyethylene glycol-electrolyte lavage solution versus sodium phosphate as bowel cleansing regimen for colonoscopy: a prospective randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  C M Poon; D W H Lee; S K Mak; C W Ko; K C Chan; K W Chan; K S Sin; A C W Chan
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 10.093

5.  Impact of bowel preparation on efficiency and cost of colonoscopy.

Authors:  Douglas K Rex; Thomas F Imperiale; Danielle R Latinovich; L Lisa Bratcher
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 10.864

6.  A prospective blinded randomized trial comparing oral sodium phosphate and polyethylene glycol solutions for bowel preparation prior to barium enema.

Authors:  A N O'Donovan; S Somers; R Farrow; J Mernagh; J Rawlinson; G W Stevenson
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 2.350

7.  Electrolyte disorders following oral sodium phosphate administration for bowel cleansing in elderly patients.

Authors:  Yichayaou Beloosesky; Josef Grinblat; Avraham Weiss; Boris Grosman; Uzi Gafter; Avry Chagnac
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2003-04-14

8.  Colonoscopy preparation in children: safety, efficacy, and tolerance of high- versus low-volume cleansing methods.

Authors:  M M da Silva; G L Briars; M K Patrick; G J Cleghorn; R W Shepherd
Journal:  J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 2.839

9.  Oral sodium phosphate compared with water enemas combined with bisacodyl as bowel preparation for elective colonoscopy.

Authors:  M Rasmussen; K Bohlbro; N Qvist
Journal:  Scand J Gastroenterol       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 2.423

10.  Picoprep-3 is a superior colonoscopy preparation to Fleet: a randomized, controlled trial comparing the two bowel preparations.

Authors:  Liu-Ming Schmidt; Pamela Williams; Denis King; Dayashan Perera
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 4.585

View more
  20 in total

1.  A consensus document on bowel preparation before colonoscopy: prepared by a task force from the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons (ASCRS), the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE), and the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES).

Authors:  Steven D Wexner; David E Beck; Todd H Baron; Robert D Fanelli; Neil Hyman; Bo Shen; Kevin E Wasco
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-06-08       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Prospective randomized comparison of oral sodium phosphate and polyethylene glycol lavage for colonoscopy preparation.

Authors:  Kai-Lin Hwang; William Tzu-Liang Chen; Koung-Hong Hsiao; Hong-Chang Chen; Ting-Ming Huang; Chien-Ming Chiu; Ger-Haur Hsu
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2005-12-21       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 3.  Oral colorectal cleansing preparations in adults.

Authors:  Sherief Shawki; Steven D Wexner
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 9.546

4.  A 71-year-old woman with abdominal pain and acute renal failure.

Authors:  Ami Schattner; Juri Kopolovic; Ehud Melzer; Jayson Rapoport
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2007-08-28       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 5.  Perioperative Fluid Management in the Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) Pathway.

Authors:  Alyssa Cheng-Cheng Zhu; Aalok Agarwala; Xiaodong Bao
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2019-02-28

Review 6.  Computed tomography colonography for the practicing radiologist: A review of current recommendations on methodology and clinical indications.

Authors:  Paola Scalise; Annalisa Mantarro; Francesca Pancrazi; Emanuele Neri
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2016-05-28

7.  Hyperphosphatemia after sodium phosphate laxatives in low risk patients: prospective study.

Authors:  Marcela-Noemi Casais; Guillermo Rosa-Diez; Susana Pérez; Elina-Noemi Mansilla; Susana Bravo; Francisco-Carlos Bonofiglio
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-12-21       Impact factor: 5.742

8.  Oral purgative and simethicone before small bowel capsule endoscopy.

Authors:  Bruno Joel Ferreira Rosa; Mara Barbosa; Joana Magalhães; Ana Rebelo; Maria João Moreira; José Cotter
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2013-02-16

9.  Comparison of two common outpatient preparations for colonoscopy in children and youth.

Authors:  Carolina Jimenez-Rivera; Donna Haas; Margaret Boland; Janice L Barkey; David R Mack
Journal:  Gastroenterol Res Pract       Date:  2009-12-06       Impact factor: 2.260

10.  CT colonography with limited bowel preparation: prospective assessment of patient experience and preference in comparison to optical colonoscopy with cathartic bowel preparation.

Authors:  Sebastiaan Jensch; Shandra Bipat; Jan Peringa; Ayso H de Vries; Anneke Heutinck; Evelien Dekker; Lubbertus C Baak; Alexander D Montauban van Swijndregt; Jaap Stoker
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2009-07-23       Impact factor: 5.315

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.