Literature DB >> 15255794

What is the best size descriptor to use for pharmacokinetic studies in the obese?

Bruce Green1, Stephen B Duffull.   

Abstract

The prevalence of obesity in the western world is dramatically rising, with many of these individuals requiring therapeutic intervention for a variety of disease states. Despite the growing prevalence of obesity there is a paucity of information describing how doses should be adjusted, or indeed whether they need to be adjusted, in the clinical setting. This review is aimed at identifying which descriptors of body size provide the most information about the relationship between dose and concentration in the obese. The size descriptors, weight, lean body weight, ideal body weight, body surface area, body mass index, fat-free mass, percent ideal body weight, adjusted body weight and predicted normal body weight were considered as potential size descriptors. We conducted an extensive review of the literature to identify studies that have assessed the quantitative relationship between the parameters clearance (CL) and volume of distribution (V) and these descriptors of body size. Surprisingly few studies have addressed the relationship between obesity and CL or V in a quantitative manner. Despite the lack of studies there were consistent findings: (i) most studies found total body weight to be the best descriptor of V. A further analysis of the studies that have addressed V found that total body weight or another descriptor that incorporated fat mass was the preferred descriptor for drugs that have high lipophilicity; (ii) in contrast, CL was best described by lean body mass and no apparent relationship between lipophilicity or clearance mechanism and preference for body size descriptor was found. In conclusion, no single descriptor described the influence of body size on both CL and V equally well. For drugs that are dosed chronically, and therefore CL is of primary concern, dosing for obese patients should not be based on their total weight. If a weight-based dose individualization is required then we would suggest that chronic drug dosing in the obese subject should be based on lean body weight, at least until a more robust size descriptor becomes available.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15255794      PMCID: PMC1884581          DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2004.02157.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol        ISSN: 0306-5251            Impact factor:   4.335


  68 in total

Review 1.  Obesity as a medical problem.

Authors:  P G Kopelman
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-04-06       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Prolongation of ifosfamide elimination half-life in obese patients due to altered drug distribution.

Authors:  M J Lind; J M Margison; T Cerny; N Thatcher; P M Wilkinson
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 3.333

3.  The effect of body weight on dalteparin pharmacokinetics. A preliminary study.

Authors:  J Y Yee; S B Duffull
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 2.953

4.  Glomerular filtration rate in severely overweight normotensive humans.

Authors:  P Anastasio; L Spitali; A Frangiosa; D Molino; D Stellato; E Cirillo; R M Pollastro; L Capodicasa; J Sepe; P Federico; N Gaspare De Santo
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 8.860

5.  How to predict carboplatin clearance from standard morphological and biological characteristics in obese patients.

Authors:  S Bénézet; R Guimbaud; E Chatelut; C Chevreau; R Bugat; P Canal
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 32.976

6.  Carbamazepine pharmacokinetics in obese and lean subjects.

Authors:  Y Caraco; E Zylber-Katz; E M Berry; M Levy
Journal:  Ann Pharmacother       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 3.154

7.  Effect of obesity on bioelectrical impedance.

Authors:  D S Gray; G A Bray; N Gemayel; K Kaplan
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  1989-08       Impact factor: 7.045

8.  Effect of body weight on the volume of distribution of theophylline.

Authors:  A Rizzo; A Mirabella; A Bonanno
Journal:  Lung       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 2.584

9.  The pharmacokinetics of dexfenfluramine in obese and non-obese subjects.

Authors:  G Cheymol; J Weissenburger; J M Poirier; C Gellee
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 4.335

10.  Caffeine pharmacokinetics in obesity and following significant weight reduction.

Authors:  Y Caraco; E Zylber-Katz; E M Berry; M Levy
Journal:  Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord       Date:  1995-04
View more
  99 in total

1.  Ertapenem for osteoarticular infections in obese patients: a pharmacokinetic study of plasma and bone concentrations.

Authors:  Jonathan Chambers; Madhu Page-Sharp; Sam Salman; John Dyer; Timothy M E Davis; Kevin T Batty; Laurens Manning
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2018-12-04       Impact factor: 2.953

Review 2.  The relationship between drug clearance and body size: systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature published from 2000 to 2007.

Authors:  Sarah C McLeay; Glynn A Morrish; Carl M J Kirkpatrick; Bruce Green
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2012-05-01       Impact factor: 6.447

3.  Dosing ethambutol in obese patients.

Authors:  Jan-Willem Alffenaar; Tjip van der Werf
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  Current dosing of low-molecular-weight heparins does not reflect licensed product labels: an international survey.

Authors:  Michael A Barras; Carl M J Kirkpatrick; Bruce Green
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 4.335

5.  What is the right dose for children?

Authors:  Massimo Cella; Catherijne Knibbe; Meindert Danhof; Oscar Della Pasqua
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 4.335

6.  Population pharmacokinetics of metformin in obese and non-obese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Christophe Bardin; Estelle Nobecourt; Etienne Larger; François Chast; Jean-Marc Treluyer; Saik Urien
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2012-01-25       Impact factor: 2.953

Review 7.  Population pharmacokinetic studies in pediatrics: issues in design and analysis.

Authors:  Bernd Meibohm; Stephanie Läer; John C Panetta; Jeffrey S Barrett
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2005-10-05       Impact factor: 4.009

8.  Allometric or lean body mass scaling of propofol pharmacokinetics: towards simplifying parameter sets for target-controlled infusions.

Authors:  Johan Francois Coetzee
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2012-03-01       Impact factor: 6.447

9.  Modelling the occurrence and severity of enoxaparin-induced bleeding and bruising events.

Authors:  Michael A Barras; Stephen B Duffull; John J Atherton; Bruce Green
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 4.335

10.  Clinical Determinants of Target Non-Attainment of Linezolid in Plasma and Interstitial Space Fluid: A Pooled Population Pharmacokinetic Analysis with Focus on Critically Ill Patients.

Authors:  Iris K Minichmayr; André Schaeftlein; Joseph L Kuti; Markus Zeitlinger; Charlotte Kloft
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 6.447

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.