Literature DB >> 15255096

Recurrent cerebellar architecture solves the motor-error problem.

John Porrill1, Paul Dean, James V Stone.   

Abstract

Current views of cerebellar function have been heavily influenced by the models of Marr and Albus, who suggested that the climbing fibre input to the cerebellum acts as a teaching signal for motor learning. It is commonly assumed that this teaching signal must be motor error (the difference between actual and correct motor command), but this approach requires complex neural structures to estimate unobservable motor error from its observed sensory consequences. We have proposed elsewhere a recurrent decorrelation control architecture in which Marr-Albus models learn without requiring motor error. Here, we prove convergence for this architecture and demonstrate important advantages for the modular control of systems with multiple degrees of freedom. These results are illustrated by modelling adaptive plant compensation for the three-dimensional vestibular ocular reflex. This provides a functional role for recurrent cerebellar connectivity, which may be a generic anatomical feature of projections between regions of cerebral and cerebellar cortex.

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15255096      PMCID: PMC1691672          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2003.2658

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  38 in total

1.  Role of the cerebellar flocculus region in cancellation of the VOR during passive whole body rotation.

Authors:  T Belton; R A McCrea
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 2.  Inhibitory control of olivary discharge.

Authors:  Alan R Gibson; Kris M Horn; Milton Pong
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 5.691

Review 3.  Brain-machine interfaces to restore motor function and probe neural circuits.

Authors:  Miguel A L Nicolelis
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 34.870

4.  Decorrelation control by the cerebellum achieves oculomotor plant compensation in simulated vestibulo-ocular reflex.

Authors:  Paul Dean; John Porrill; James V Stone
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2002-09-22       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Adaptive feedback control models of the vestibulocerebellum and spinocerebellum.

Authors:  H Gomi; M Kawato
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.086

6.  Prediction of complex two-dimensional trajectories by a cerebellar model of smooth pursuit eye movement.

Authors:  R E Kettner; S Mahamud; H C Leung; N Sitkoff; J C Houk; B W Peterson; A G Barto
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Evidence for a GABA-mediated cerebellar inhibition of the inferior olive in the cat.

Authors:  G Andersson; M Garwicz; G Hesslow
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Role of primate flocculus during rapid behavioral modification of vestibuloocular reflex. II. Mossy fiber firing patterns during horizontal head rotation and eye movement.

Authors:  S G Lisberger; A F Fuchs
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1978-05       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Neuronal activity in the flocculus of the alert monkey during sinusoidal optokinetic stimulation.

Authors:  G Markert; U Büttner; A Straube; R Boyle
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Eye movement related neurons in the cat pontine reticular formation: projection to the flocculus.

Authors:  S Nakao; I S Curthoys; C H Markham
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1980-02-10       Impact factor: 3.252

View more
  29 in total

1.  Evidence for wide range of time scales in oculomotor plant dynamics: implications for models of eye-movement control.

Authors:  Sokratis Sklavos; John Porrill; Chris R S Kaneko; Paul Dean
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Report on a workshop concerning the cerebellum and motor learning, held in St Louis October 2004.

Authors:  Stephen M Highstein; John Porrill; Paul Dean
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 3.847

Review 3.  Besides Purkinje cells and granule neurons: an appraisal of the cell biology of the interneurons of the cerebellar cortex.

Authors:  Karl Schilling; John Oberdick; Ferdinando Rossi; Stephan L Baader
Journal:  Histochem Cell Biol       Date:  2008-08-02       Impact factor: 4.304

4.  Adaptive-filter models of the cerebellum: computational analysis.

Authors:  Paul Dean; John Porrill
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 3.847

5.  Adapting to inversion of the visual field: a new twist on an old problem.

Authors:  Timothy P Lillicrap; Pablo Moreno-Briseño; Rosalinda Diaz; Douglas B Tweed; Nikolaus F Troje; Juan Fernandez-Ruiz
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-05-23       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 6.  Model learning for robot control: a survey.

Authors:  Duy Nguyen-Tuong; Jan Peters
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2011-04-13

Review 7.  Evaluating the adaptive-filter model of the cerebellum.

Authors:  Paul Dean; John Porrill
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2011-04-18       Impact factor: 5.182

8.  Eye Velocity Gain Fields in MSTd During Optokinetic Stimulation.

Authors:  Lukas Brostek; Ulrich Büttner; Michael J Mustari; Stefan Glasauer
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2014-02-20       Impact factor: 5.357

Review 9.  Cerebellar physiology: links between microcircuitry properties and sensorimotor functions.

Authors:  Henrik Jörntell
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2016-08-31       Impact factor: 5.182

10.  Sensory prediction or motor control? Application of marr-albus type models of cerebellar function to classical conditioning.

Authors:  Nathan F Lepora; John Porrill; Christopher H Yeo; Paul Dean
Journal:  Front Comput Neurosci       Date:  2010-10-04       Impact factor: 2.380

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.