Literature DB >> 21487784

Model learning for robot control: a survey.

Duy Nguyen-Tuong1, Jan Peters.   

Abstract

Models are among the most essential tools in robotics, such as kinematics and dynamics models of the robot's own body and controllable external objects. It is widely believed that intelligent mammals also rely on internal models in order to generate their actions. However, while classical robotics relies on manually generated models that are based on human insights into physics, future autonomous, cognitive robots need to be able to automatically generate models that are based on information which is extracted from the data streams accessible to the robot. In this paper, we survey the progress in model learning with a strong focus on robot control on a kinematic as well as dynamical level. Here, a model describes essential information about the behavior of the environment and the influence of an agent on this environment. In the context of model-based learning control, we view the model from three different perspectives. First, we need to study the different possible model learning architectures for robotics. Second, we discuss what kind of problems these architecture and the domain of robotics imply for the applicable learning methods. From this discussion, we deduce future directions of real-time learning algorithms. Third, we show where these scenarios have been used successfully in several case studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21487784     DOI: 10.1007/s10339-011-0404-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cogn Process        ISSN: 1612-4782


  23 in total

Review 1.  Internal models for motor control and trajectory planning.

Authors:  M Kawato
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 6.627

2.  Sparse on-line gaussian processes.

Authors:  Lehel Csató; Manfred Opper
Journal:  Neural Comput       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 2.026

3.  Is imitation learning the route to humanoid robots?

Authors: 
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 20.229

4.  Multiple paired forward and inverse models for motor control.

Authors:  D M Wolpert; M Kawato
Journal:  Neural Netw       Date:  1998-10

5.  Recurrent cerebellar architecture solves the motor-error problem.

Authors:  John Porrill; Paul Dean; James V Stone
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2004-04-22       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Movement generation with circuits of spiking neurons.

Authors:  Prashant Joshi; Wolfgang Maass
Journal:  Neural Comput       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 2.026

7.  Online reservoir adaptation by intrinsic plasticity for backpropagation-decorrelation and echo state learning.

Authors:  Jochen J Steil
Journal:  Neural Netw       Date:  2007-05-03

8.  Exploiting redundancy for flexible behavior: unsupervised learning in a modular sensorimotor control architecture.

Authors:  Martin V Butz; Oliver Herbort; Joachim Hoffmann
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 8.934

9.  Internal models in the cerebellum.

Authors:  D M Wolpert; R C Miall; M Kawato
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  1998-09-01       Impact factor: 20.229

10.  Feedback error learning and nonlinear adaptive control.

Authors:  Jun Nakanishi; Stefan Schaal
Journal:  Neural Netw       Date:  2004-12
View more
  12 in total

1.  A Novel Recurrent Neural Network for Improving Redundant Manipulator Motion Planning Completeness.

Authors:  Yangming Li; Shuai Li; Blake Hannaford
Journal:  IEEE Int Conf Robot Autom       Date:  2018-09-13

2.  Nonparametric Online Learning Control for Soft Continuum Robot: An Enabling Technique for Effective Endoscopic Navigation.

Authors:  Kit-Hang Lee; Denny K C Fu; Martin C W Leong; Marco Chow; Hing-Choi Fu; Kaspar Althoefer; Kam Yim Sze; Chung-Kwong Yeung; Ka-Wai Kwok
Journal:  Soft Robot       Date:  2017-08-28       Impact factor: 8.071

3.  Synergetic motor control paradigm for optimizing energy efficiency of multijoint reaching via tacit learning.

Authors:  Mitsuhiro Hayashibe; Shingo Shimoda
Journal:  Front Comput Neurosci       Date:  2014-02-28       Impact factor: 2.380

4.  Hammering Does Not Fit Fitts' Law.

Authors:  Tadej Petrič; Cole S Simpson; Aleš Ude; Auke J Ijspeert
Journal:  Front Comput Neurosci       Date:  2017-05-29       Impact factor: 2.380

5.  Goal-related feedback guides motor exploration and redundancy resolution in human motor skill acquisition.

Authors:  Marieke Rohde; Kenichi Narioka; Jochen J Steil; Lina K Klein; Marc O Ernst
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2019-03-05       Impact factor: 4.475

6.  Phase-Synchronized Learning of Periodic Compliant Movement Primitives (P-CMPs).

Authors:  Tadej Petrič
Journal:  Front Neurorobot       Date:  2020-11-12       Impact factor: 2.650

7.  Model-Based Control of Soft Actuators Using Learned Non-linear Discrete-Time Models.

Authors:  Phillip Hyatt; David Wingate; Marc D Killpack
Journal:  Front Robot AI       Date:  2019-04-09

8.  Evaluation of linearly solvable Markov decision process with dynamic model learning in a mobile robot navigation task.

Authors:  Ken Kinjo; Eiji Uchibe; Kenji Doya
Journal:  Front Neurorobot       Date:  2013-04-05       Impact factor: 2.650

9.  A computational analysis of motor synergies by dynamic response decomposition.

Authors:  Cristiano Alessandro; Juan Pablo Carbajal; Andrea d'Avella
Journal:  Front Comput Neurosci       Date:  2014-01-16       Impact factor: 2.380

10.  Statistical Learning Model of the Sense of Agency.

Authors:  Shiro Yano; Yoshikatsu Hayashi; Yuki Murata; Hiroshi Imamizu; Takaki Maeda; Toshiyuki Kondo
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2020-10-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.