Literature DB >> 18972182

Adaptive-filter models of the cerebellum: computational analysis.

Paul Dean1, John Porrill.   

Abstract

Many current models of the cerebellar cortical microcircuit are equivalent to an adaptive filter using the covariance learning rule. The adaptive filter is a development of the original Marr-Albus framework that deals naturally with continuous time-varying signals, thus addressing the issue of 'timing' in cerebellar function, and it can be connected in a variety of ways to other parts of the system, consistent with the microzonal organization of cerebellar cortex. However, its computational capacities are not well understood. Here we summarise the results of recent work that has focused on two of its intrinsic properties. First, an adaptive filter seeks to decorrelate its (mossy fibre) inputs from a (climbing fibre) teaching signal. This procedure can be used both for sensory processing, e.g. removal of interference from sensory signals, and for learning accurate motor commands, by decorrelating an efference copy of those commands from a sensory signal of inaccuracy. As a model of the cerebellum the adaptive filter thus forms a natural link between events at the cellular level, such as forms of synaptic plasticity and the learning rules they embody, and intelligent behaviour at the system level. Secondly, it has been shown that the covariance learning rule enables the filter to handle input and intrinsic noise optimally. Such optimality may underlie the recently described role of the cerebellum in producing accurate smooth pursuit eye movements in the face of sensory noise. Moreover, it has the consequence of driving most input weights to very small values, consistent with experimental data that many parallel-fibre synapses are normally silent. The effectiveness of silent synapses can only be altered by LTP, so learning tasks depending on a reduction of Purkinje cell firing require the synapses to be embedded in a second, inhibitory pathway from parallel fibre to Purkinje cell. This pathway and the appropriate climbing-fibre related plasticity have been described experimentally, and its presence has implications for asymmetries and hysteresis in behavioural learning rates that are also consistent with experimental observations. These computational properties of the adaptive filter suggest that it is both powerful and realistic enough to be a suitable candidate model of the cerebellar cortical microcircuit.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18972182     DOI: 10.1007/s12311-008-0067-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cerebellum        ISSN: 1473-4222            Impact factor:   3.847


  42 in total

1.  Decorrelation control by the cerebellum achieves oculomotor plant compensation in simulated vestibulo-ocular reflex.

Authors:  Paul Dean; John Porrill; James V Stone
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2002-09-22       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Recurrent cerebellar architecture solves the motor-error problem.

Authors:  John Porrill; Paul Dean; James V Stone
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2004-04-22       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Adaptive feedback control models of the vestibulocerebellum and spinocerebellum.

Authors:  H Gomi; M Kawato
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.086

4.  The linear computational algorithm of cerebellar Purkinje cells.

Authors:  Joy T Walter; Kamran Khodakhah
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2006-12-13       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Active reversal of motor memories reveals rules governing memory encoding.

Authors:  Edward S Boyden; Jennifer L Raymond
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2003-09-11       Impact factor: 17.173

6.  Prediction of complex two-dimensional trajectories by a cerebellar model of smooth pursuit eye movement.

Authors:  R E Kettner; S Mahamud; H C Leung; N Sitkoff; J C Houk; B W Peterson; A G Barto
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Different responses of rat cerebellar Purkinje cells and Golgi cells evoked by widespread convergent sensory inputs.

Authors:  Tahl Holtzman; Thimali Rajapaksa; Abteen Mostofi; Steve A Edgley
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2006-05-18       Impact factor: 5.182

8.  Variation, signal, and noise in cerebellar sensory-motor processing for smooth-pursuit eye movements.

Authors:  Javier F Medina; Stephen G Lisberger
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2007-06-20       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Cerebellar motor learning: when is cortical plasticity not enough?

Authors:  John Porrill; Paul Dean
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 4.475

10.  Silent synapses, LTP, and the indirect parallel-fibre pathway: computational consequences of optimal cerebellar noise-processing.

Authors:  John Porrill; Paul Dean
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2008-05-23       Impact factor: 4.475

View more
  17 in total

Review 1.  Consensus paper: roles of the cerebellum in motor control--the diversity of ideas on cerebellar involvement in movement.

Authors:  Mario Manto; James M Bower; Adriana Bastos Conforto; José M Delgado-García; Suzete Nascimento Farias da Guarda; Marcus Gerwig; Christophe Habas; Nobuhiro Hagura; Richard B Ivry; Peter Mariën; Marco Molinari; Eiichi Naito; Dennis A Nowak; Nordeyn Oulad Ben Taib; Denis Pelisson; Claudia D Tesche; Caroline Tilikete; Dagmar Timmann
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 3.847

2.  Time course of classically conditioned Purkinje cell response is determined by initial part of conditioned stimulus.

Authors:  Dan-Anders Jirenhed; Germund Hesslow
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-06-22       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 3.  Evaluating the adaptive-filter model of the cerebellum.

Authors:  Paul Dean; John Porrill
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2011-04-18       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  Crossing zones in the vestibulocerebellum: a commentary.

Authors:  John I Simpson
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 3.847

5.  Computational Theory Underlying Acute Vestibulo-ocular Reflex Motor Learning with Cerebellar Long-Term Depression and Long-Term Potentiation.

Authors:  Keiichiro Inagaki; Yutaka Hirata
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 3.847

6.  Model-founded explorations of the roles of molecular layer inhibition in regulating purkinje cell responses in cerebellar cortex: more trouble for the beam hypothesis.

Authors:  James M Bower
Journal:  Front Cell Neurosci       Date:  2010-08-27       Impact factor: 5.505

7.  Sensory prediction or motor control? Application of marr-albus type models of cerebellar function to classical conditioning.

Authors:  Nathan F Lepora; John Porrill; Christopher H Yeo; Paul Dean
Journal:  Front Comput Neurosci       Date:  2010-10-04       Impact factor: 2.380

Review 8.  Interactions Between Purkinje Cells and Granule Cells Coordinate the Development of Functional Cerebellar Circuits.

Authors:  Meike E van der Heijden; Roy V Sillitoe
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2020-06-14       Impact factor: 3.590

Review 9.  Redefining the cerebellar cortex as an assembly of non-uniform Purkinje cell microcircuits.

Authors:  Nadia L Cerminara; Eric J Lang; Roy V Sillitoe; Richard Apps
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 34.870

10.  Purkinje cell-specific knockout of the protein phosphatase PP2B impairs potentiation and cerebellar motor learning.

Authors:  M Schonewille; A Belmeguenai; S K Koekkoek; S H Houtman; H J Boele; B J van Beugen; Z Gao; A Badura; G Ohtsuki; W E Amerika; E Hosy; F E Hoebeek; Y Elgersma; C Hansel; C I De Zeeuw
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2010-08-26       Impact factor: 18.688

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.