Literature DB >> 15254488

Understanding the relationship between the inbreeding coefficient and multilocus heterozygosity: theoretical expectations and empirical data.

J Slate1, P David, K G Dodds, B A Veenvliet, B C Glass, T E Broad, J C McEwan.   

Abstract

Geneticists have been interested in inbreeding and inbreeding depression since the time of Darwin. Two alternative approaches that can be used to measure how inbred an individual is involve the use of pedigree records to estimate inbreeding coefficients or molecular markers to measure multilocus heterozygosity. However, the relationship between inbreeding coefficient and heterozygosity has only rarely been investigated. In this paper, a framework to predict the relationship between the two variables is presented. In addition, microsatellite genotypes at 138 loci spanning all 26 autosomes of the sheep genome were used to investigate the relationship between inbreeding coefficient and multilocus heterozygosity. Multilocus heterozygosity was only weakly correlated with inbreeding coefficient, and heterozygosity was not positively correlated between markers more often than expected by chance. Inbreeding coefficient, but not multilocus heterozygosity, detected evidence of inbreeding depression for morphological traits. The relevance of these findings to the causes of heterozygosity--fitness correlations is discussed and predictions for other wild and captive populations are presented.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15254488     DOI: 10.1038/sj.hdy.6800485

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)        ISSN: 0018-067X            Impact factor:   3.821


  83 in total

1.  Variability of individual genetic load: consequences for the detection of inbreeding depression.

Authors:  Gwendal Restoux; Priscille Huot de Longchamp; Bruno Fady; Etienne K Klein
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2012-05-26       Impact factor: 1.082

2.  Inbreeding causes early death in a passerine bird.

Authors:  N L Hemmings; J Slate; T R Birkhead
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2012-05-29       Impact factor: 14.919

3.  Performance of marker-based relatedness estimators in natural populations of outbred vertebrates.

Authors:  Katalin Csilléry; Toby Johnson; Dario Beraldi; Tim Clutton-Brock; Dave Coltman; Bengt Hansson; Goran Spong; Josephine M Pemberton
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2006-06-18       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Maximum-likelihood estimation of allelic dropout and false allele error rates from microsatellite genotypes in the absence of reference data.

Authors:  Paul C D Johnson; Daniel T Haydon
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2006-12-18       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 5.  Female choice for genetic complementarity in birds: a review.

Authors:  Herman L Mays; Tomas Albrecht; Mark Liu; Geoffrey E Hill
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2007-11-02       Impact factor: 1.082

6.  Female extrapair mate choice in a cooperative breeder: trading sex for help and increasing offspring heterozygosity.

Authors:  Dustin R Rubenstein
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2007-08-07       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 7.  Wild pedigrees: the way forward.

Authors:  J M Pemberton
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2008-03-22       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Reduced heterozygosity impairs sperm quality in endangered mammals.

Authors:  John L Fitzpatrick; Jonathan P Evans
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2009-03-04       Impact factor: 3.703

9.  Local effects of inbreeding on embryo number and consequences for genetic diversity in Kerguelen mouflon.

Authors:  Renaud Kaeuffer; Denis Réale; Dominique Pontier; Jean-Louis Chapuis; David W Coltman
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2008-10-23       Impact factor: 3.703

Review 10.  Genetic variation, inbreeding and chemical exposure--combined effects in wildlife and critical considerations for ecotoxicology.

Authors:  A Ross Brown; David J Hosken; François Balloux; Lisa K Bickley; Gareth LePage; Stewart F Owen; Malcolm J Hetheridge; Charles R Tyler
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2009-11-27       Impact factor: 6.237

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.