Literature DB >> 15250831

Cytologic and DNA-cytometric very early diagnosis of oral cancer.

D Maraki1, J Becker, A Boecking.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of exfoliative cytology (EC) and DNA-image cytometry applied to suspicious oral lesions compared with synchronous histology.
METHODS: Brush- and scalpel biopsies were obtained from 98 patients with suspicious oral lesions. In cases, in which EC revealed malignant or suspicious cells, nuclear DNA-contents were measured using a TV image analysis system.
RESULTS: Among 98 oral lesions both cytological and histological diagnosis showed no sign of malignancy or dysplasia in 75. In 23 cases cytology yielded tumor cell-positive (15), suspicious (four) or doubtful (four) results. DNA-cytometry showed aneuploidy in 19 of these. The comparison between cytological diagnosis combined with DNA-cytometry and biopsy-histology resulted in a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 97.4%.
CONCLUSION: In conclusion, cytology with DNA-cytometry is a highly sensitive, specific and non-invasive method for the early diagnosis of oral epithelial neoplasia, showing excellent compliance among patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15250831     DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0714.2004.0235.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oral Pathol Med        ISSN: 0904-2512            Impact factor:   4.253


  28 in total

1.  Distinct perturbations of oral squamous cell carcinoma patients: A quantitative cytomorphometric analysis.

Authors:  Deepti Sharma; Simarpreet V Sandhu; Himanta Bansal; Shruti Gupta
Journal:  Int J Health Sci (Qassim)       Date:  2015-07

2.  High-molecular tenascin-C as an indicator of atypical cells in oral brush biopsies.

Authors:  O Driemel; R Dahse; A Berndt; H Pistner; S G Hakim; L Zardi; T E Reichert; H Kosmehl
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2006-11-17       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 3.  Molecular predictors of clinical outcome in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Giovana R Thomas; Hari Nadiminti; Jacinto Regalado
Journal:  Int J Exp Pathol       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 1.925

Review 4.  [Oral cytology: historical development, current status, and perspectives].

Authors:  M Hullmann; T E Reichert; R Dahse; F von Eggeling; H Pistner; H Kosmehl; O Driemel
Journal:  Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir       Date:  2007-01

5.  Diagnostic efficiency of differentiating small cancerous and precancerous lesions using mucosal brush smears of the oral cavity--a prospective and blinded study.

Authors:  Felix Peter Koch; Martin Kunkel; Stefan Biesterfeld; Wilfried Wagner
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2010-07-01       Impact factor: 3.573

6.  Brush biopsy with DNA-image cytometry: a useful and noninvasive method for monitoring malignant transformation of potentially malignant oral disorders.

Authors:  Jiang-Min Ma; Ting-Jun Zhou; Ran Wang; Jing Shan; Yu-Nong Wu; Xiao-Ling Song; Ning Gu; Yuan Fan
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2014-02-18       Impact factor: 2.503

7.  Diagnosis of oral lichen planus from analysis of saliva samples using terahertz time-domain spectroscopy and chemometrics.

Authors:  Yury Kistenev; Alexey Borisov; Maria Titarenko; Olga Baydik; Alexander Shapovalov
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 3.170

8.  Anatomic site based ploidy analysis of oral premalignant lesions.

Authors:  M N Islam; L Kornberg; E Veenker; D M Cohen; I Bhattacharyya
Journal:  Head Neck Pathol       Date:  2009-11-24

Review 9.  Exciting new advances in oral cancer diagnosis: avenues to early detection.

Authors:  Ravi Mehrotra; Dwijendra K Gupta
Journal:  Head Neck Oncol       Date:  2011-07-28

10.  [Performance of conventional oral brush biopsies].

Authors:  O Driemel; M Kunkel; M Hullmann; N Kleinsasser; R Staudenmaier; U Müller-Richter; T E Reichert; H Kosmehl
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 1.284

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.