Literature DB >> 15250791

Stereotype threat and performance: how self-stereotypes influence processing by inducing regulatory foci.

Beate Seibt1, Jens Förster.   

Abstract

The authors hypothesized that activated self-stereotypes can influence the strategies of task solution by inducing regulatory foci. More specifically, positive self-stereotypes should induce a promotion focus state of eagerness, whereas negative stereotypes should induce a prevention focus state of vigilance. Study 1 showed that a negative ascribed stereotype with regard to task performance leads to better recall for avoidance-related statements whereas a positive stereotype leads to better recall for approach-related statements. In Studies 2 and 3, both an experimental manipulation of group performance expectation and the preexisting stereotype of better verbal skills in women than in men led to faster and less accurate performance in the positive as compared with the negative stereotype group. Studies 4 and 5 showed that positive in-group stereotypes led to more creative performance whereas negative stereotypes led to better analytical performance. These results point to a possible mechanism for stereotype-threat effects. Copyright 2004 American Psychological Association

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15250791     DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.87.1.38

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol        ISSN: 0022-3514


  30 in total

1.  Age differences in the underlying mechanisms of stereotype threat effects.

Authors:  Lauren E Popham; Thomas M Hess
Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci       Date:  2013-09-28       Impact factor: 4.077

Review 2.  A review of the stereotype threat literature and its application in a neurological population.

Authors:  Karen A Kit; Holly A Tuokko; Catherine A Mateer
Journal:  Neuropsychol Rev       Date:  2008-04-16       Impact factor: 7.444

Review 3.  An integrated process model of stereotype threat effects on performance.

Authors:  Toni Schmader; Michael Johns; Chad Forbes
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 8.934

4.  Stereotype Fit Effects for Golf Putting Nonexperts.

Authors:  Lisa R Grimm; Benjamin Lewis; W Todd Maddox; Arthur B Markman
Journal:  Sport Exerc Perform Psychol       Date:  2015-10-05

5.  Spontaneous default mode network phase-locking moderates performance perceptions under stereotype threat.

Authors:  Chad E Forbes; Jordan B Leitner; Kelly Duran-Jordan; Adam B Magerman; Toni Schmader; John J B Allen
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2014-11-14       Impact factor: 3.436

6.  How Stereotype Threat Affects Healthy Older Adults' Performance on Clinical Assessments of Cognitive Decline: The Key Role of Regulatory Fit.

Authors:  Sarah J Barber; Mara Mather; Margaret Gatz
Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci       Date:  2015-03-08       Impact factor: 4.077

Review 7.  An Examination of Age-Based Stereotype Threat About Cognitive Decline.

Authors:  Sarah J Barber
Journal:  Perspect Psychol Sci       Date:  2017-01

8.  Effects of stereotype threat, perceived discrimination, and examiner race on neuropsychological performance: simple as black and white?

Authors:  April D Thames; Charles H Hinkin; Desiree A Byrd; Robert M Bilder; Kimberley J Duff; Monica Rivera Mindt; Alyssa Arentoft; Vanessa Streiff
Journal:  J Int Neuropsychol Soc       Date:  2013-02-07       Impact factor: 2.892

9.  Stereotype threat and executive resource depletion: examining the influence of emotion regulation.

Authors:  Michael Johns; Michael Inzlicht; Toni Schmader
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2008-11

10.  Moderators of and mechanisms underlying stereotype threat effects on older adults' memory performance.

Authors:  Thomas M Hess; Joey T Hinson; Elizabeth A Hodges
Journal:  Exp Aging Res       Date:  2009 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 1.645

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.