Sarah J Barber1, Mara Mather2, Margaret Gatz3. 1. Department of Psychology, San Francisco State University, California. barber@sfsu.edu. 2. Davis School of Gerontology and. 3. Department of Psychology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Stereotype threat can impair older adults' performance on clinical assessments for cognitive decline. We examined why this occurs. Based upon the regulatory focus account of stereotype threat, we predicted that the effects of stereotype threat should depend upon the assessments' reward structure. Stereotype threat should be associated with poor performance when the assessment emphasizes gaining correct answers, but not when it emphasizes avoiding mistakes. METHOD: Healthy older adults completed a series of mental status examinations. Half of the participants completed these examinations under stereotype threat about their cognitive abilities. Monetary incentives were also manipulated. For half of the participants correct responding led to gains. For the remaining participants incorrect responding/forgetting led to losses. RESULTS: Consistent with the regulatory focus account, stereotype threat was associated with poor performance when the mental status examinations had a gains-based structure, but not when they had a losses-based structure. DISCUSSION: Older adults respond to stereotype threat by becoming vigilant to avoid the losses that will make them their worst. Researchers and clinicians can capitalize on this motivational change to combat stereotype threat's negative effects. By using a loss-avoidance frame, stereotype threat's negative effects can be attenuated or even eliminated.
OBJECTIVES: Stereotype threat can impair older adults' performance on clinical assessments for cognitive decline. We examined why this occurs. Based upon the regulatory focus account of stereotype threat, we predicted that the effects of stereotype threat should depend upon the assessments' reward structure. Stereotype threat should be associated with poor performance when the assessment emphasizes gaining correct answers, but not when it emphasizes avoiding mistakes. METHOD: Healthy older adults completed a series of mental status examinations. Half of the participants completed these examinations under stereotype threat about their cognitive abilities. Monetary incentives were also manipulated. For half of the participants correct responding led to gains. For the remaining participants incorrect responding/forgetting led to losses. RESULTS: Consistent with the regulatory focus account, stereotype threat was associated with poor performance when the mental status examinations had a gains-based structure, but not when they had a losses-based structure. DISCUSSION: Older adults respond to stereotype threat by becoming vigilant to avoid the losses that will make them their worst. Researchers and clinicians can capitalize on this motivational change to combat stereotype threat's negative effects. By using a loss-avoidance frame, stereotype threat's negative effects can be attenuated or even eliminated.
Authors: Lissette M Piedra; Flavia C D Andrade; Rosalba Hernandez; Seth William Boughton; Laura Trejo; Catherine A Sarkisian Journal: Gerontologist Date: 2017-11-10
Authors: Kim Gauthier; Alexandrine Morand; Frederic Dutheil; Béatrice Alescio-Lautier; José Boucraut; David Clarys; Francis Eustache; Nadine Girard; Eric Guedj; Marie Mazerolle; Marc Paccalin; Vincent de la Sayette; Aline Zaréa; Pascal Huguet; Bernard F Michel; Béatrice Desgranges; Isabelle Régner Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2019-10-07 Impact factor: 2.692