Literature DB >> 15250785

Context noise and item noise jointly determine recognition memory: a comment on Dennis and Humphreys (2001).

Amy H Criss1, Richard M Shiffrin.   

Abstract

S. Dennis and M. S. Humphreys (see record 2001-17194-007) proposed a model with the strict assumption that recognition memory is not affected by interference from other items. Instead, confusions are due to noise generated by prior contexts in which the test item appeared. This model seems disparate from existing models of recognition memory but is similar in many ways that are not superficially obvious. One difference is the order in which item and context information are used as retrieval cues. A more critical difference is the assertion that only an item's history, and not other items, affects recognition memory. Conceptual arguments along with the results of 2 experiments make a persuasive case that both types of noise affect recognition. To illustrate the approach, the authors fit experimental data with a version of the retrieving effectively from memory model (R. M. Shiffrin & M. Steyvers, 1997) incorporating both sources of noise. ((c) 2004 APA, all rights reserved)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15250785     DOI: 10.1037/0033-295X.111.3.800

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Rev        ISSN: 0033-295X            Impact factor:   8.934


  15 in total

1.  Feature frequency effects in recognition memory.

Authors:  Kenneth J Malmberg; Mark Steyvers; Joseph D Stephens; Richard M Shiffrin
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2002-06

2.  The role of stimulus type in list length effects in recognition memory.

Authors:  Angela Kinnell; Simon Dennis
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2012-04

3.  Pairs do not suffer interference from other types of pairs or single items in associative recognition.

Authors:  Amy H Criss; Richard M Shiffrin
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2004-12

4.  Recursive reminding: effects of repetition, printed frequency, connectivity, and set size on recognition and judgments of frequency.

Authors:  Serena L Fisher; Douglas L Nelson
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2006-03

5.  Semantic organization of study materials has opposite effects on recognition and recall.

Authors:  Scott A Guerin; Michael B Miller
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2008-04

6.  Distinguishing between attributional and mnemonic sources of familiarity: the case of positive emotion bias.

Authors:  Michael F Verde; Laura K Stone; Hannah S Hatch; Simone Schnall
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2010-03

7.  The list length effect in recognition memory: an analysis of potential confounds.

Authors:  Angela Kinnell; Simon Dennis
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2011-02

8.  Collaborative remembering revisited: Study context access modulates collaborative inhibition and later benefits for individual memory.

Authors:  Magdalena Abel; Karl-Heinz T Bäuml
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2017-11

9.  Individual differences in criterion-based dropout learning in old age: the role of processing speed and verbal knowledge.

Authors:  Tanja Kurtz; Daniel Zimprich
Journal:  Eur J Ageing       Date:  2013-10-10

10.  Some-or-none recollection: Evidence from item and source memory.

Authors:  Serge V Onyper; Yaofei X Zhang; Marc W Howard
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2010-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.