Literature DB >> 15248872

Early bone formation adjacent to rough and turned endosseous implant surfaces. An experimental study in the dog.

Ingemar Abrahamsson1, Tord Berglundh, Elena Linder, Niklaus P Lang, Jan Lindhe.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To validate a proposed model (Berglundh et al. 2003) and to evaluate the rate and degree of osseointegration at turned (T) and sand blasted and acid etched (SLA) implant surfaces during early phases of healing.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: The devices used for the study of early healing had a geometry that corresponded to that of a solid screw implant with either a SLA or a T surface configuration. A circumferential trough had been prepared within the thread region (intra-osseous portion) that established a geometrically well-defined wound chamber. Twenty Labrador dogs received totally 160 experimental devices to allow the evaluation of healing between 2 h and 12 weeks. Both ground and decalcified sections were prepared from mesial/distal and buccal/lingual device sites. Histometric and morphometric analyses of the ground sections and morphometric analysis of the tissue components in decalcified sections were performed.
RESULTS: The ground sections provided an overview of the various phases of tissue formation, while the decalcified, thin sections enabled a more detailed study of events involved in bone tissue modeling and remodeling for both SLA and T surfaces. The initially empty wound chamber became occupied with a coagulum and a granulation tissue that was replaced by a provisional matrix. The process of bone formation started already during the first week. The newly formed bone present at the lateral border of the cut bony bed appeared to be continuous with the parent bone, but on the SLA surface woven bone was also found at a distance from the parent bone. Parallel-fibered and/or lamellar bone as well as bone marrow replaced this primary bone after 4 weeks. In the SLA chambers, more bone-to-device contact, more initial woven bone and earlier lamellar bone formation was found than in the T chambers.
CONCLUSION: Osseointegration represents a dynamic process both during its establishment and its maintenance. While healing showed similar characteristics with resorptive and appositional events for both SLA and T surfaces, the rate and degree of osseointegration were superior for the SLA compared with the T chambers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15248872     DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2004.01082.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res        ISSN: 0905-7161            Impact factor:   5.977


  47 in total

1.  The response of osteoblastic MC3T3-E1 cells to micro- and nano-textured, hydrophilic and bioactive titanium surfaces.

Authors:  S Lumetti; E Manfredi; S Ferraris; S Spriano; G Passeri; G Ghiacci; G Macaluso; C Galli
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2016-02-17       Impact factor: 3.896

2.  Numerical assessment of bone remodeling around conventionally and early loaded titanium and titanium-zirconium alloy dental implants.

Authors:  Kıvanç Akça; Atılım Eser; Yeliz Çavuşoğlu; Elçin Sağırkaya; Murat Cavit Çehreli
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2015-03-01       Impact factor: 2.602

3.  [Chemically modified, ultra-hydrophilic titanium implant surfaces].

Authors:  Frank Schwarz; Monika Herten; Marco Wieland; Michel Dard; Jürgen Becker
Journal:  Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir       Date:  2007-01

4.  Bioactive and thermally compatible glass coating on zirconia dental implants.

Authors:  A Kirsten; A Hausmann; M Weber; J Fischer; H Fischer
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2014-11-24       Impact factor: 6.116

Review 5.  Implants in bone: part I. A current overview about tissue response, surface modifications and future perspectives.

Authors:  Cornelius von Wilmowsky; Tobias Moest; Emeka Nkenke; Florian Stelzle; Karl Andreas Schlegel
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2013-02-24

6.  Radiological implications of crestal and subcrestal implant placement in posterior areas. A cone-beam computed tomography study.

Authors:  Hilario Pellicer-Chover; Julio Rojo-Sanchís; Miguel Peñarrocha-Diago; José Viña-Almunia; David Peñarrocha-Oltra; Maria Peñarrocha-Diago
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2020-09-01

7.  Bone tissue response to titanium implant surfaces modified with carboxylate and sulfonate groups.

Authors:  S Kerner; V Migonney; G Pavon-Djavid; G Helary; L Sedel; F Anagnostou
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2009-11-10       Impact factor: 3.896

8.  Bone tissue response to experimental zirconia implants.

Authors:  Ilja Mihatovic; Vladimir Golubovic; Jürgen Becker; Frank Schwarz
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2016-08-09       Impact factor: 3.573

9.  Differences in crestal bone-to-implant contact following an under-drilling compared to an over-drilling protocol. A study in the rabbit tibia.

Authors:  Omer Cohen; Zeev Ormianer; Haim Tal; Daniel Rothamel; Miron Weinreb; Ofer Moses
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2016-03-02       Impact factor: 3.573

10.  Micromechanical modeling of the contact stiffness of an osseointegrated bone-implant interface.

Authors:  Maria Letizia Raffa; Vu-Hieu Nguyen; Guillaume Haiat
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2019-12-03       Impact factor: 2.819

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.