Literature DB >> 15248154

Trisomy recurrence: a reconsideration based on North American data.

Dorothy Warburton1, Louis Dallaire, Maya Thangavelu, Lori Ross, Bruce Levin, Jennie Kline.   

Abstract

Few reliable data exist concerning the recurrence risk for individual trisomies or the risk for recurrence of trisomy for a different chromosome. We collected records from two sources: (1) prenatal diagnoses performed at the Hopital Sainte-Justine in Montreal and (2) karyotype analyses performed at Genzyme. Using the standardized morbidity ratio (SMR), we compared the observed number of trisomies at prenatal diagnosis with the expected numbers, given maternal age-specific rates (by single year). SMRs were calculated both for recurrence of the same trisomy (homotrisomy) and of a different trisomy (heterotrisomy). After all cases with an index trisomy 21 were combined, the SMR for homotrisomy was 2.4 (90% CI 1.6-3.4; P=.0005). For women with both the index trisomy and subsequent prenatal diagnosis at age <30 years, the SMR was 8.0; it was 2.1 for women with both pregnancies at age >/=30 years. For the other index viable trisomies (13, 18, XXX, and XXY) combined, the SMR for homotrisomy was 2.5 (90% CI 0.7-8.0). For heterotrisomy, the SMR after an index trisomy 21 was 2.3 (90% CI 1.5-3.8, P=.0007); the SMR did not vary with maternal age at the first trisomy. When all cases with index viable trisomies were combined, the SMR for heterotrisomy was 1.6 (90% CI 1.1-2.4; P=.04). For prenatal diagnoses following a nonviable trisomy diagnosed in a spontaneous abortion (from Genzyme data only), the SMR for a viable trisomy was 1.8 (90% CI 1.1-3.0; P=.04). The significantly increased risk for heterotrisomy supports the hypothesis that some women have a risk for nondisjunction higher than do others of the same age.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15248154      PMCID: PMC1182017          DOI: 10.1086/423331

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Hum Genet        ISSN: 0002-9297            Impact factor:   11.025


  24 in total

1.  Genome-wide variation in recombination in female meiosis: a risk factor for non-disjunction of chromosome 21.

Authors:  A S Brown; E Feingold; K W Broman; S L Sherman
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2000-03-01       Impact factor: 6.150

2.  Trisomic pregnancy and earlier age at menopause.

Authors:  J Kline; A Kinney; B Levin; D Warburton
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2000-06-28       Impact factor: 11.025

3.  What is the true fetal loss rate in pregnancies affected by trisomy 21 and how does this influence whether first trimester detection rates are superior to those in the second trimester?

Authors:  K Spencer
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 3.050

4.  DNA polymorphism analysis in families with recurrence of free trisomy 21.

Authors:  C G Pangalos; C C Talbot; J G Lewis; P A Adelsberger; M B Petersen; J L Serre; M O Rethoré; M C de Blois; P Parent; A A Schinzel
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 11.025

5.  Does the karyotype of a spontaneous abortion predict the karyotype of a subsequent abortion? Evidence from 273 women with two karyotyped spontaneous abortions.

Authors:  D Warburton; J Kline; Z Stein; M Hutzler; A Chin; T Hassold
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1987-09       Impact factor: 11.025

6.  Maternal age-specific risks for trisomies at 9-14 weeks' gestation.

Authors:  R J Snijders; W Holzgreve; H Cuckle; K H Nicolaides
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 3.050

7.  Genetic variation in rates of nondisjunction: association of two naturally occurring polymorphisms in the chromokinesin nod with increased rates of nondisjunction in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  M E Zwick; J L Salstrom; C H Langley
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Recurrent trisomy 21 in a couple with a child presenting trisomy 21 mosaicism and maternal uniparental disomy for chromosome 21 in the euploid cell line.

Authors:  H Bruyère; R Rupps; B D Kuchinka; J M Friedman; W P Robinson
Journal:  Am J Med Genet       Date:  2000-09-04

Review 9.  Chromosomal non-disjunction in human oocytes: is there a mitochondrial connection?

Authors:  E A Schon; S H Kim; J C Ferreira; P Magalhães; M Grace; D Warburton; S J Gross
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 6.918

Review 10.  To err (meiotically) is human: the genesis of human aneuploidy.

Authors:  T Hassold; P Hunt
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 53.242

View more
  25 in total

1.  2006 William Allan Award Address. Having it all.

Authors:  Dorothy Warburton
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 11.025

2.  Prenatal testing for Down syndrome: comparison of screening practices in the UK and USA.

Authors:  Dagmar Tapon
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2009-11-03       Impact factor: 2.537

3.  Practice guidelines for communicating a prenatal or postnatal diagnosis of Down syndrome: recommendations of the national society of genetic counselors.

Authors:  Kathryn B Sheets; Blythe G Crissman; Cori D Feist; Susan L Sell; Lisa R Johnson; Kelly C Donahue; Diane Masser-Frye; Gail S Brookshire; Amanda M Carre; Danielle Lagrave; Campbell K Brasington
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2011-05-27       Impact factor: 2.537

4.  Karyotype evaluation of repeated abortions in primary and secondary recurrent pregnancy loss.

Authors:  T V Nikitina; E A Sazhenova; D I Zhigalina; E N Tolmacheva; N N Sukhanova; I N Lebedev
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2020-02-03       Impact factor: 3.412

5.  Using FISH to increase the yield and accuracy of karyotypes from spontaneous abortion specimens.

Authors:  Vaidehi Jobanputra; Cecilia Esteves; Antonio Sobrino; Stephen Brown; Jennie Kline; Dorothy Warburton
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2011-04-11       Impact factor: 3.050

6.  CASP3 protein expression by flow cytometry in Down's syndrome subjects.

Authors:  Michele Salemi; Rosita A Condorelli; Corrado Romano; Barone Concetta; Carmelo Romano; Maria Grazia Salluzzo; Paolo Bosco; Aldo E Calogero
Journal:  Hum Cell       Date:  2013-12-13       Impact factor: 4.174

Review 7.  Preimplantation genetic diagnosis/screening by comprehensive molecular testing.

Authors:  Hiroki Kurahashi; Takema Kato; Jun Miyazaki; Haruki Nishizawa; Eiji Nishio; Hiroshi Furukawa; Hironori Miyamura; Mayuko Ito; Toshiaki Endo; Yuya Ouchi; Hidehito Inagaki; Takuma Fujii
Journal:  Reprod Med Biol       Date:  2015-07-14

8.  Genetic evaluation and counseling of couples with recurrent miscarriage: recommendations of the National Society of Genetic Counselors.

Authors:  Mercy Y Laurino; Robin L Bennett; Devki S Saraiya; Lisa Baumeister; Debra Lochner Doyle; Kathleen Leppig; Barbara Pettersen; Robert Resta; Larry Shields; Stefanie Uhrich; Elizabeth A Varga; Wendy H Raskind
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 2.537

9.  Dual diagnoses in 152 patients with Turner syndrome: Knowledge of the second condition may lead to modification of treatment and/or surveillance.

Authors:  Kelly L Jones; Erin A McNamara; Mauro Longoni; Danny E Miller; Mersedeh Rohanizadegan; Laura A Newman; Frances Hayes; Lynne L Levitsky; Betty L Herrington; Angela E Lin
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2018-08-06       Impact factor: 2.802

10.  Mechanisms of mosaicism, chimerism and uniparental disomy identified by single nucleotide polymorphism array analysis.

Authors:  Laura K Conlin; Brian D Thiel; Carsten G Bonnemann; Livija Medne; Linda M Ernst; Elaine H Zackai; Matthew A Deardorff; Ian D Krantz; Hakon Hakonarson; Nancy B Spinner
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2010-01-06       Impact factor: 6.150

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.