Literature DB >> 15243072

Cross-resistance between fluconazole and ravuconazole and the use of fluconazole as a surrogate marker to predict susceptibility and resistance to ravuconazole among 12,796 clinical isolates of Candida spp.

M A Pfaller1, S A Messer, L Boyken, C Rice, S Tendolkar, R J Hollis, D J Diekema.   

Abstract

Cross-resistance within a class of antimicrobial agents is a problem that is often encountered with antibacterial agents, and it is also an issue with antifungal agents. A current example is ravuconazole, a new triazole antifungal with an expanded spectrum and potency against Candida spp., Aspergillus spp., and other opportunistic fungal pathogens. The present study addresses the issue of cross-resistance between fluconazole and ravuconazole and the use of fluconazole as a surrogate marker to predict the susceptibility of Candida spp. to ravuconazole. Reference broth microdilution MIC results for 12,796 strains of Candida spp. isolated from more than 200 medical centers worldwide were used. Ravuconazole MICs and tentative interpretive categories (susceptible, </=1 microg/ml; resistant, >/=2 microg/ml) were compared with those of fluconazole by using regression statistics and error rate bounding analyses. For all 12,796 isolates, the absolute categorical agreement rate was 92.5% (rate of false-susceptible results, or very major errors [VME], 0.1%). Ravuconazole was active (MIC, </=1 microg/ml) against 99.9% of the fluconazole-susceptible isolates, 96% of the fluconazole-susceptible dose-dependent isolates, and 49% of the fluconazole-resistant isolates, including 99% of the Candida krusei isolates. Since ravuconazole is 16- to 32-fold more potent than fluconazole, the performance of fluconazole as a surrogate marker for ravuconazole susceptibility was improved by designating those isolates with fluconazole MICs of </=32 microg/ml susceptible to ravuconazole, resulting in a categorical agreement rate of 98.3%, with a VME rate of 0.3% (99 and 0.4%, respectively, when C. krusei was omitted). Cross-resistance between fluconazole and ravuconazole applies most directly to fluconazole-resistant Candida glabrata and is variable among other species of Candida. Fluconazole may serve as a surrogate marker to predict the susceptibility of Candida spp. to ravuconazole.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15243072      PMCID: PMC446250          DOI: 10.1128/JCM.42.7.3137-3141.2004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  12 in total

1.  Clinical evaluation of a frozen commercially prepared microdilution panel for antifungal susceptibility testing of seven antifungal agents, including the new triazoles posaconazole, ravuconazole, and voriconazole.

Authors:  M A Pfaller; D J Diekema; S A Messer; L Boyken; H Huynh; R J Hollis
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 2.  Twelve years of fluconazole in clinical practice: global trends in species distribution and fluconazole susceptibility of bloodstream isolates of Candida.

Authors:  M A Pfaller; D J Diekema
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Infect       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 8.067

3.  Has antifungal susceptibility testing come of age?

Authors:  John H Rex; Michael A Pfaller
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2002-09-24       Impact factor: 9.079

4.  Role of sentinel surveillance of candidemia: trends in species distribution and antifungal susceptibility.

Authors:  M A Pfaller; D J Diekema
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  In vitro activities of ravuconazole (BMS-207147) against 541 clinical isolates of Cryptococcus neoformans.

Authors:  T Yamazumi; M A Pfaller; S A Messer; A Houston; R J Hollis; R N Jones
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 6.  Development of interpretive breakpoints for antifungal susceptibility testing: conceptual framework and analysis of in vitro-in vivo correlation data for fluconazole, itraconazole, and candida infections. Subcommittee on Antifungal Susceptibility Testing of the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards.

Authors:  J H Rex; M A Pfaller; J N Galgiani; M S Bartlett; A Espinel-Ingroff; M A Ghannoum; M Lancaster; F C Odds; M G Rinaldi; T J Walsh; A L Barry
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 9.079

7.  Can antimicrobial susceptibility testing results for ciprofloxacin or levofloxacin predict susceptibility to a newer fluoroquinolone, gatifloxacin?: Report from The SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program (1997-99).

Authors:  R N Jones; M A Pfaller
Journal:  Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 2.803

8.  In vitro activities of ravuconazole and voriconazole compared with those of four approved systemic antifungal agents against 6,970 clinical isolates of Candida spp.

Authors:  M A Pfaller; S A Messer; R J Hollis; R N Jones; D J Diekema
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 5.191

9.  Multicenter comparison of the sensititre YeastOne Colorimetric Antifungal Panel with the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory standards M27-A reference method for testing clinical isolates of common and emerging Candida spp., Cryptococcus spp., and other yeasts and yeast-like organisms.

Authors:  A Espinel-Ingroff; M Pfaller; S A Messer; C C Knapp; S Killian; H A Norris; M A Ghannoum
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 5.948

10.  In vitro activities of voriconazole, posaconazole, and fluconazole against 4,169 clinical isolates of Candida spp. and Cryptococcus neoformans collected during 2001 and 2002 in the ARTEMIS global antifungal surveillance program.

Authors:  M A Pfaller; S A Messer; L Boyken; R J Hollis; C Rice; S Tendolkar; D J Diekema
Journal:  Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 2.803

View more
  19 in total

Review 1.  Rare and emerging opportunistic fungal pathogens: concern for resistance beyond Candida albicans and Aspergillus fumigatus.

Authors:  M A Pfaller; D J Diekema
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 2.  Interpretive breakpoints for fluconazole and Candida revisited: a blueprint for the future of antifungal susceptibility testing.

Authors:  M A Pfaller; D J Diekema; D J Sheehan
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 26.132

3.  Impact of new antifungal breakpoints on antifungal resistance in Candida species.

Authors:  Annette W Fothergill; Deanna A Sutton; Dora I McCarthy; Nathan P Wiederhold
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2014-01-08       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 4.  Biology of the pathogenic yeast Candida glabrata.

Authors:  A Bialková; J Subík
Journal:  Folia Microbiol (Praha)       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.099

Review 5.  Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Candida albicans, and device-related nosocomial infections: implications, trends, and potential approaches for control.

Authors:  George E Pierce
Journal:  J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2005-05-03       Impact factor: 3.346

6.  Use of micafungin as a surrogate marker to predict susceptibility and resistance to caspofungin among 3,764 clinical isolates of Candida by use of CLSI methods and interpretive criteria.

Authors:  Michael A Pfaller; Shawn A Messer; Daniel J Diekema; Ronald N Jones; Mariana Castanheira
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2013-10-23       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Use of fluconazole as a surrogate marker to predict susceptibility and resistance to voriconazole among 13,338 clinical isolates of Candida spp. Tested by clinical and laboratory standards institute-recommended broth microdilution methods.

Authors:  M A Pfaller; S A Messer; L Boyken; C Rice; S Tendolkar; R J Hollis; D J Diekema
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2006-11-01       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Correlating echinocandin MIC and kinetic inhibition of fks1 mutant glucan synthases for Candida albicans: implications for interpretive breakpoints.

Authors:  Guillermo Garcia-Effron; Steven Park; David S Perlin
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2008-10-27       Impact factor: 5.191

9.  Patterns of susceptibility of Aspergillus isolates recovered from patients enrolled in the Transplant-Associated Infection Surveillance Network.

Authors:  John W Baddley; Kieren A Marr; David R Andes; Thomas J Walsh; Carol A Kauffman; Dimitrios P Kontoyiannis; James I Ito; S Arunmozhi Balajee; Peter G Pappas; Stephen A Moser
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2009-08-19       Impact factor: 5.948

10.  Selection of a surrogate agent (fluconazole or voriconazole) for initial susceptibility testing of posaconazole against Candida spp.: results from a global antifungal surveillance program.

Authors:  M A Pfaller; S A Messer; L Boyken; S Tendolkar; R J Hollis; D J Diekema
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2007-12-19       Impact factor: 5.948

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.