Literature DB >> 15243004

Influence of the number of motile spermatozoa inseminated and of their morphology on the success of intrauterine insemination.

Robert Wainer1, Martine Albert, Agnès Dorion, Marc Bailly, Marianne Bergère, Raoul Lombroso, Myriam Gombault, Jacqueline Selva.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although intrauterine insemination (IUI) is one of the most common assisted reproductive technology methods in the world, the relative influence of various semen characteristics on the likelihood of a successful outcome is controversial. The aim of our study was to assess the results of IUI as a function of both the number of motile spermatozoa inseminated (NMSI) and the percentage of morphologically normal spermatozoa after preparation.
METHODS: This was a retrospective study of 889 couples who underwent 2564 IUI cycles of ovarian stimulation with HMG or recombinant FSH in our centre between January 1991 and December 2000.
RESULTS: A total of 331 clinical pregnancies were obtained, for a pregnancy rate/cycle of 12.91%. When the NMSI was < 1 x 10(6), the pregnancy rate/cycle was significantly lower (3.13%) than in any of the subgroups with NMSI > or = 2 x 10(6). Sperm morphology, assessed before or after preparation, was not in itself a significant factor that affected the likelihood of IUI success. Nonetheless, when the post-migration rate of normal sperm was < 30%, the pregnancy rate/cycle was 5.43% when NMSI was < 5 x 10(6) and 18.42% when NMSI was > or = 5 x 10(6) (P = 0.008). Pregnancy rates did not differ significantly according to NMSI when the percentage of normal sperm after preparation was > or = 30%, or according to percentage of normal sperm when the NMSI was > or = 5 x 10(6).
CONCLUSIONS: Our results show that a minimum of 5 x 10(6) motile spermatozoa should be inseminated when the normal morphology of the sperm after preparation is < 30%; the quantity compensates at least in part for the defective quality. If this threshold of NMSI cannot be obtained, IVF should be recommended.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15243004     DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deh390

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


  26 in total

Review 1.  Double versus single homologous intrauterine insemination for male factor infertility: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Apostolos Zavos; Alexandros Daponte; Antonios Garas; Christina Verykouki; Evangelos Papanikolaou; Georgios Anifandis; Nikolaos P Polyzos
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2013-05-27       Impact factor: 3.285

2.  Intrauterine insemination: is the timing correct?

Authors:  Tansu Kucuk
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2008-09-02       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  Success in pregnancy through intrauterine insemination at first cycle in 300 infertile couples: an analysis.

Authors:  Babita Panda; Lita Mohapatra; Mahesh C Sahu; Rabindra N Padhy
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India       Date:  2013-12-01

4.  A Survey on Main Semen Parameters in Natural Pregnancy and Intrauterine Insemination: Are There Any Significant Differences?

Authors:  Roshanak Aboutorabi; Soudabeh Zamani; Yasaman Zarrin; Fatemeh Sadat Mostafavi
Journal:  Am J Mens Health       Date:  2016-05-04

5.  Increased count, motility, and total motile sperm cells collected across three consecutive ejaculations within 24 h of oocyte retrieval: implications for management of men presenting with low numbers of motile sperm for assisted reproduction.

Authors:  Al-Hasen Said; Michael L Reed
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2015-06-17       Impact factor: 3.412

6.  A randomized controlled study to evaluate the cost-effectiveness in sperm extraction using carbon dioxide and carbon dioxide free system in relation to intrauterine insemination pregnancy.

Authors:  Rajesh Bhakta; Pratap Kumar; Satish Kumar Adiga; Gurprasad Kalthur
Journal:  J Hum Reprod Sci       Date:  2010-01

7.  Factors Leading to Pregnancies in Stimulated Intrauterine Insemination Cycles and the Use of Consecutive Ejaculations Within a Small Clinic Environment.

Authors:  Gulam Bahadur; Ofran Almossawi; Afeeza IIlahibuccus; Ansam Al-Habib; Stanley Okolo
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India       Date:  2016-05-20

8.  Predictive value of postwashed total progressively motile sperm count using CASA estimates in 6871 non-donor intrauterine insemination cycles.

Authors:  Orkun Tan; Thoa Ha; Bruce R Carr; Paul Nakonezny; Kathleen M Doody; Kevin J Doody
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2014-08-10       Impact factor: 3.412

9.  Intrauterine insemination cycles: prediction of success and thresholds for poor prognosis and futile care.

Authors:  Alessandra J Ainsworth; Emily P Barnard; Sarah C Baumgarten; Amy L Weaver; Zaraq Khan
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2020-08-15       Impact factor: 3.412

10.  The potential use of intrauterine insemination as a basic option for infertility: a review for technology-limited medical settings.

Authors:  Abdelrahman M Abdelkader; John Yeh
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Int       Date:  2009
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.