Literature DB >> 15242403

Sibling rivalry: competition between Pol X family members in V(D)J recombination and general double strand break repair.

Stephanie A Nick McElhinny1, Dale A Ramsden.   

Abstract

The nonhomologous end-joining pathway is a major means for repairing double-strand breaks (DSBs) in all mitotic cell types. This repair pathway is also the only efficient means for resolving DSB intermediates in V(D)J recombination, a lymphocyte-specific genome rearrangement required for assembly of antigen receptors. A role for polymerases in end-joining has been well established. They are a major factor in determining the character of repair junctions but, in contrast to 'core' end-joining factors, typically appear to have a subtle impact on the efficiency of end-joining. Recent work implicates several members of the Pol X family in end-joining and suggests surprising complexity in the control of how these different polymerases are employed in this pathway.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15242403     DOI: 10.1111/j.0105-2896.2004.00160.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Immunol Rev        ISSN: 0105-2896            Impact factor:   12.988


  27 in total

1.  Efficiency of nonhomologous DNA end joining varies among somatic tissues, despite similarity in mechanism.

Authors:  Sheetal Sharma; Bibha Choudhary; Sathees C Raghavan
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2010-08-03       Impact factor: 9.261

2.  Creative template-dependent synthesis by human polymerase mu.

Authors:  Andrea F Moon; Rajendrakumar A Gosavi; Thomas A Kunkel; Lars C Pedersen; Katarzyna Bebenek
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-08-03       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  DNA polymerases and somatic hypermutation of immunoglobulin genes.

Authors:  Mineaki Seki; Patricia J Gearhart; Richard D Wood
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 8.807

Review 4.  The X family portrait: structural insights into biological functions of X family polymerases.

Authors:  Andrea F Moon; Miguel Garcia-Diaz; Vinod K Batra; William A Beard; Katarzyna Bebenek; Thomas A Kunkel; Samuel H Wilson; Lars C Pedersen
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2007-07-12

Review 5.  Quality control of DNA break metabolism: in the 'end', it's a good thing.

Authors:  Roland Kanaar; Claire Wyman; Rodney Rothstein
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2008-02-20       Impact factor: 11.598

Review 6.  Base excision repair.

Authors:  Hans E Krokan; Magnar Bjørås
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2013-04-01       Impact factor: 10.005

Review 7.  Mechanisms of double-strand break repair in somatic mammalian cells.

Authors:  Andrea J Hartlerode; Ralph Scully
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  2009-09-25       Impact factor: 3.857

8.  Loop 1 modulates the fidelity of DNA polymerase lambda.

Authors:  Katarzyna Bebenek; Miguel Garcia-Diaz; Rui-Zhe Zhou; Lawrence F Povirk; Thomas A Kunkel
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2010-04-30       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 9.  XRCC4 and XLF form long helical protein filaments suitable for DNA end protection and alignment to facilitate DNA double strand break repair.

Authors:  Brandi L Mahaney; Michal Hammel; Katheryn Meek; John A Tainer; Susan P Lees-Miller
Journal:  Biochem Cell Biol       Date:  2013-02-05       Impact factor: 3.626

10.  Histone H2AX stabilizes broken DNA strands to suppress chromosome breaks and translocations during V(D)J recombination.

Authors:  Bu Yin; Velibor Savic; Marisa M Juntilla; Andrea L Bredemeyer; Katherine S Yang-Iott; Beth A Helmink; Gary A Koretzky; Barry P Sleckman; Craig H Bassing
Journal:  J Exp Med       Date:  2009-11-02       Impact factor: 14.307

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.