Literature DB >> 15242400

The role of the non-homologous end-joining pathway in lymphocyte development.

Sean Rooney1, Jayanta Chaudhuri, Frederick W Alt.   

Abstract

One of the most toxic insults a cell can incur is a disruption of its linear DNA in the form of a double-strand break (DSB). Left unrepaired, or repaired improperly, these lesions can result in cell death or neoplastic transformation. Despite these dangers, lymphoid cells purposely introduce DSBs into their genome to maximize the diversity and effector functions of their antigen receptor genes. While the generation of breaks requires distinct lymphoid-specific factors, their resolution requires various ubiquitously expressed DNA-repair proteins, known collectively as the non-homologous end-joining pathway. In this review, we discuss the factors that constitute this pathway as well as the evidence of their involvement in two lymphoid-specific DNA recombination events.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15242400     DOI: 10.1111/j.0105-2896.2004.00165.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Immunol Rev        ISSN: 0105-2896            Impact factor:   12.988


  113 in total

1.  Specificity of the dRP/AP lyase of Ku promotes nonhomologous end joining (NHEJ) fidelity at damaged ends.

Authors:  Natasha Strande; Steven A Roberts; Sehyun Oh; Eric A Hendrickson; Dale A Ramsden
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2012-02-23       Impact factor: 5.157

2.  Functional redundancy between repair factor XLF and damage response mediator 53BP1 in V(D)J recombination and DNA repair.

Authors:  Valentyn Oksenych; Frederick W Alt; Vipul Kumar; Bjoern Schwer; Duane R Wesemann; Erica Hansen; Harin Patel; Arthur Su; Chunguang Guo
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-01-30       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  The role of mechanistic factors in promoting chromosomal translocations found in lymphoid and other cancers.

Authors:  Yu Zhang; Monica Gostissa; Dominic G Hildebrand; Michael S Becker; Cristian Boboila; Roberto Chiarle; Susanna Lewis; Frederick W Alt
Journal:  Adv Immunol       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 3.543

Review 4.  The X family portrait: structural insights into biological functions of X family polymerases.

Authors:  Andrea F Moon; Miguel Garcia-Diaz; Vinod K Batra; William A Beard; Katarzyna Bebenek; Thomas A Kunkel; Samuel H Wilson; Lars C Pedersen
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2007-07-12

5.  Activation-induced cytidine deaminase action is strongly stimulated by mutations of the THO complex.

Authors:  Belén Gómez-González; Andrés Aguilera
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-05-08       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 6.  DNA damage and repair during lymphoid development: antigen receptor diversity, genomic integrity and lymphomagenesis.

Authors:  Nahum Puebla-Osorio; Chengming Zhu
Journal:  Immunol Res       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 2.829

7.  Integrated signaling in developing lymphocytes: the role of DNA damage responses.

Authors:  Jeffrey J Bednarski; Barry P Sleckman
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2012-10-03       Impact factor: 4.534

8.  Alternative induction of meiotic recombination from single-base lesions of DNA deaminases.

Authors:  Siim Pauklin; Julia S Burkert; Julie Martin; Fekret Osman; Sandra Weller; Simon J Boulton; Matthew C Whitby; Svend K Petersen-Mahrt
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2009-02-23       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Functional overlap in the cis-acting regulation of the V(D)J recombination at the TCRbeta locus.

Authors:  Bernard Khor; Grace K Mahowald; Katrina Khor; Barry P Sleckman
Journal:  Mol Immunol       Date:  2008-12-13       Impact factor: 4.407

10.  PARP-14, a member of the B aggressive lymphoma family, transduces survival signals in primary B cells.

Authors:  Sung Hoon Cho; Shreevrat Goenka; Tiina Henttinen; Prathyusha Gudapati; Arja Reinikainen; Christine M Eischen; Riitta Lahesmaa; Mark Boothby
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2009-01-15       Impact factor: 22.113

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.