Literature DB >> 1524028

Characteristics of face seal leakage in filtering facepieces.

C C Chen1, K Willeke.   

Abstract

Several studies have found that aerosol size, testing method, leak size, leak position, sampling probe location, and the mixing condition inside the respirator affect the results of fit factor measurements. This study focuses on the effect of leak shape and filter resistance because leaks have been reported to vary in shape from circular to slit-like. Four leaks of different shape but the same cross-sectional area were used to study their effect on aerosol penetration. Dust-mist and high-efficiency particulate air filtering facepieces provided different filter resistances. An aerodynamic particle sizer and a laser aerosol spectrometer were used to measure the particle size-dependent aerosol concentrations inside and outside the respirators. The filtering facepieces were sealed to a mannequin and artificial leaks were inserted near the right cheek. Aerosol penetration was measured for five flow rates ranging from 5 to 100 L/min. The pressure drop across the mask was monitored with an inclined manometer. At a given pressure differential, a slit-like leak and multiple circular leaks have been found to pass less aerosols than a single circular leak of equal cross-sectional area because the leak flow decreases with an increase in leak shape complexity. If there is substantial lack of face seal fit and the breathing rate is low, a HEPA respirator may provide less protection than a dust-mist respirator because the pressure drop is considerably higher for a HEPA respirator, resulting in more aerosol flow through the leak.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1524028     DOI: 10.1080/15298669291360120

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Ind Hyg Assoc J        ISSN: 0002-8894


  11 in total

1.  Criteria for the collection of useful respirator performance data in the workplace.

Authors:  Larry Janssen; Ziqing Zhuang; Ronald Shaffer
Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 2.155

2.  Development of an advanced respirator fit-test headform.

Authors:  Michael S Bergman; Ziqing Zhuang; David Hanson; Brian K Heimbuch; Michael J McDonald; Andrew J Palmiero; Ronald E Shaffer; Delbert Harnish; Michael Husband; Joseph D Wander
Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 2.155

3.  Effects of breathing frequency and flow rate on the total inward leakage of an elastomeric half-mask donned on an advanced manikin headform.

Authors:  Xinjian He; Sergey A Grinshpun; Tiina Reponen; Roy McKay; Michael S Bergman; Ziqing Zhuang
Journal:  Ann Occup Hyg       Date:  2013-10-08

4.  Comparison of Simulated Workplace Protection Factors Offered by N95 and P100 Filtering Facepiece and Elastomeric Half-Mask Respirators against Particles of 10 to 400 nm.

Authors:  Xinjian He; Evanly Vo; M Horvatin; Y Liu; M Bergman; Z Zhuang
Journal:  J Nanotechnol Mater Sci       Date:  2015-09-07

5.  Performance of an N95 filtering facepiece particulate respirator and a surgical mask during human breathing: two pathways for particle penetration.

Authors:  Sergey A Grinshpun; Hiroki Haruta; Robert M Eninger; Tiina Reponen; Roy T McKay; Shu-An Lee
Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 2.155

6.  The critical importance of mask seals on respirator performance: An analytical and simulation approach.

Authors:  Mingxin Xu; Peter Lee; David Collins
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-02-17       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Pressure drop of filtering facepiece respirators: How low should we go?

Authors:  Jung-Hyun Kim; Raymond J Roberge; Jeffrey B Powell; Ronald E Shaffer; Caroline M Ylitalo; John M Sebastian
Journal:  Int J Occup Med Environ Health       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 1.843

8.  Particle Size-Selective Assessment of Protection of European Standard FFP Respirators and Surgical Masks against Particles-Tested with Human Subjects.

Authors:  Shu-An Lee; Dong-Chir Hwang; He-Yi Li; Chieh-Fu Tsai; Chun-Wan Chen; Jen-Kun Chen
Journal:  J Healthc Eng       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 2.682

Review 9.  Respiratory protection against bioaerosols: literature review and research needs.

Authors:  Appavoo Rengasamy; Ziqing Zhuang; Roland Berryann
Journal:  Am J Infect Control       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 2.918

10.  Unipolar ion emission enhances respiratory protection against fine and ultrafine particles.

Authors:  Byung Uk Lee; Mikhail Yermakov; Sergey A Grinshpun
Journal:  J Aerosol Sci       Date:  2004-07-07       Impact factor: 3.433

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.