Literature DB >> 24579751

Criteria for the collection of useful respirator performance data in the workplace.

Larry Janssen1, Ziqing Zhuang, Ronald Shaffer.   

Abstract

Workplace protection factors (WPFs) are intended to measure the ability of a respiratory protective device (RPD) to reduce contaminant exposure when used in the context of an effective respiratory protection program. In 1992, members of the American Industrial Hygiene Association Respiratory Protection Committee (RPC) published a review of important issues and considerations for measuring respirator performance in the workplace. The RPC recognized that respirator testing in workplaces can have a variety of objectives and endpoints, and that not all workplace measurements are WPFs. That paper addressed concerns in the general categories of 1) study objectives; 2) site selection; 3) subject selection and preparation; 4) sampling and analytical methods; and 5) data analysis. No specific protocol for measuring WPFs was recommended by the RPC, and attempts to reach a U.S. consensus on a WPF protocol since 1992 have not succeeded. Numerous studies have implemented the principles for WPF measurement described in the RPC paper. Modifications to the original recommendations have been made to reflect the current state of the art. This article describes what has been learned in recent years in each of the five categories identified in the 1992 discussion. Because of the wide variety of workplaces and work activities, contaminants and respiratory protective devices, a strict protocol is not appropriate for collecting WPF data. Rather, the minimum requirements for the collection and presentation of meaningful respirator performance data in the workplace are described. Understanding of these principles will permit useful RPD performance data to be generated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24579751      PMCID: PMC4739800          DOI: 10.1080/15459624.2013.852282

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg        ISSN: 1545-9624            Impact factor:   2.155


  60 in total

1.  An effective protection factor study of respirators used by primary lead smelter workers.

Authors:  T M Spear; J DuMond; C Lloyd; J H Vincent
Journal:  Appl Occup Environ Hyg       Date:  2000-02

2.  Effect of test exercises and mask donning on measured respirator fit.

Authors:  C D Crutchfield; E O Fairbank; S L Greenstein
Journal:  Appl Occup Environ Hyg       Date:  1999-12

3.  Laboratory study to assess causative factors affecting temporal changes in filtering facepiece respirator fit: part I - pilot study.

Authors:  Ziqing Zhuang; Stacey Benson; Stephanie Lynch; Andy Palmiero; Raymond Roberge
Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 2.155

4.  Meaningful workplace protection factor measurement: experimental protocols and data treatment.

Authors:  N Vaughan; B Rajan-Sithamparanadarajah
Journal:  Ann Occup Hyg       Date:  2005-05-06

5.  The effect of pressure drop on respirator faceseal leakage.

Authors:  Larry Janssen; Robert Weber
Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 2.155

6.  Comparison of six respirator fit-test methods with an actual measurement of exposure in a simulated health care environment: Part I--Protocol development.

Authors:  C C Coffey; D L Campbell; W R Myers; Z Zhuang; S Das
Journal:  Am Ind Hyg Assoc J       Date:  1998-12

7.  Field performance measurements of half-facepiece respirators: steel mill operations.

Authors:  W R Myers; Z Zhuang
Journal:  Am Ind Hyg Assoc J       Date:  1998-11

8.  Comparison of workplace protection factors for different biological contaminants.

Authors:  Kyungmin Jacob Cho; Tiina Reponen; Roy McKay; Alok Dwivedi; Atin Adhikari; Umesh Singh; Rakesh Shukla; Susan Jones; Gordon Jones; Sergey A Grinshpun
Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 2.155

9.  Estimated workplace protection factors for positive-pressure self-contained breathing apparatus.

Authors:  D L Campbell; G P Noonan; T R Merinar; J A Stobbe
Journal:  Am Ind Hyg Assoc J       Date:  1994-04

10.  Field performance measurements of half-facepiece respirators--foundry operations.

Authors:  W R Myers; Z Zhuang; T Nelson
Journal:  Am Ind Hyg Assoc J       Date:  1996-02
View more
  4 in total

1.  Evaluation of a New Workplace Protection Factor-Measuring Method for Filtering Facepiece Respirator.

Authors:  Chenchen Sun; Christoph Thelen; Iris Sancho Sanz; Andreas Wittmann
Journal:  Saf Health Work       Date:  2019-11-13

Review 2.  Technological Scenario for Masks in Patent Database During Covid-19 Pandemic.

Authors:  Tatianny de Araújo Andrade; José Adão Carvalho Nascimento Junior; Anamaria Mendonça Santos; Lysandro Pinto Borges; Lucindo José Quintans-Júnior; Cristiani Isabel Banderó Walker; Luiza Abrahão Frank; Mairim Russo Serafini
Journal:  AAPS PharmSciTech       Date:  2021-02-11       Impact factor: 3.246

3.  Considerations for recommending extended use and limited reuse of filtering facepiece respirators in health care settings.

Authors:  Edward M Fisher; Ronald E Shaffer
Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 2.155

Review 4.  Which type of personal protective equipment (PPE) and which method of donning or doffing PPE carries the least risk of infection for healthcare workers?

Authors:  Shalika Hegde
Journal:  Evid Based Dent       Date:  2020-06
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.