Literature DB >> 1523853

Longitudinal study of semen quality in Wisconsin men over one decade.

F M Wittmaack1, S S Shapiro.   

Abstract

To determine whether there has been a time-related change in semen quality, we examined a Wisconsin population of men over a 10-year period. The semen quality of potential sperm donors was assessed between the years 1978 and 1987. The semen analyses included sperm concentration, motility, and morphology. No significant changes over time were observed for sperm concentration or motility. The percentage of morphologically abnormal sperm rose sharply between 1982 and 1983. This, however, coincided with a change in criteria used to identify abnormal sperm, and was, therefore, due to a procedural artifact. In summary, we found no evidence of a decline in semen quality in our Wisconsin population over a 10-year period.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1523853

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Wis Med J        ISSN: 0043-6542


  9 in total

1.  Myth and reality of the decline in semen quality: an example of the relativity of data interpretation.

Authors:  L Gandini; F Lombardo; F Culasso; F Dondero; A Lenzi
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 4.256

2.  Relationship between cadmium content in semen and male infertility: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yiming Zhang; Shiping Li; Shu Li
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2018-11-20       Impact factor: 4.223

Review 3.  Spatiotemporal trends in human semen quality.

Authors:  Jacques Auger; Florence Eustache; Cécile Chevrier; Bernard Jégou
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2022-08-17       Impact factor: 16.430

4.  Have sperm densities declined? A reanalysis of global trend data.

Authors:  S H Swan; E P Elkin; L Fenster
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 9.031

5.  Regional differences invalidate U.S. sperm trend conclusions.

Authors:  J Heinze
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 9.031

6.  Debate about sperm count decline.

Authors:  F Orejuela; L I Lipshultz; D J Lamb
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 9.031

7.  Interregional differences undermine sperm trend conclusions.

Authors:  J Heinze
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 9.031

8.  Geographic differences in semen quality of fertile U.S. males.

Authors:  Shanna H Swan; Charlene Brazil; Erma Z Drobnis; Fan Liu; Robin L Kruse; Maureen Hatch; J Bruce Redmon; Christina Wang; James W Overstreet
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 9.  The possible effects of environmental estrogen disrupters on reproductive health.

Authors:  H Fisch; G Hyun; R Golden
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 2.862

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.