Literature DB >> 10391731

Regional differences invalidate U.S. sperm trend conclusions.

J Heinze.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  1999        PMID： 10391731      PMCID： PMC1566384          DOI： 10.1289/ehp.107-1566384

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Health Perspect        ISSN： 0091-6765            Impact factor:   9.031


× No keyword cloud information.
  5 in total

1.  Longitudinal study of semen quality in Wisconsin men over one decade.

Authors:  F M Wittmaack; S S Shapiro
Journal:  Wis Med J       Date:  1992-08

Review 2.  Male fertility potential in terms of semen quality: a review of the past, a study of the present.

Authors:  J MacLeod; Y Wang
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  1979-02       Impact factor: 7.329

3.  Geographic variations in sperm counts: a potential cause of bias in studies of semen quality.

Authors:  H Fisch; E T Goluboff
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 7.329

4.  Semen analyses in 1,283 men from the United States over a 25-year period: no decline in quality.

Authors:  H Fisch; E T Goluboff; J H Olson; J Feldshuh; S J Broder; D H Barad
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 7.329

5.  Data from men in greater Seattle area reveals no downward trend in semen quality: further evidence that deterioration of semen quality is not geographically uniform.

Authors:  C A Paulsen; N G Berman; C Wang
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 7.329
  5 in total
  1 in total

1.  U.S. sperm trend conclusions.

Authors:  W H James
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 9.031
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.