Literature DB >> 9370524

Have sperm densities declined? A reanalysis of global trend data.

S H Swan1, E P Elkin, L Fenster.   

Abstract

In 1992 a worldwide decline in sperm density was reported; this was quickly followed by numerous critiques and editorials. Because of the public health importance of this finding, a detailed reanalysis of data from 61 studies was warranted to resolve these issues. Multiple linear regression models (controlling for abstinence time, age, percent proven fertility, specimen collection method, study goal and location) were used to examine regional differences and the interaction between region (United States, Europe, and non-Western countries) and year. Nonlinear models and residual confounding were also examined in these data. Using a linear model (adjusted R2 = 0. 80), means and slopes differed significantly across regions (p = 0. 02). Mean sperm densities were highest in Europe and lowest in non-Western countries. A decline in sperm density was seen in the United States (studies from 1938-1988; slope = -1.50; 95% confidence interval (CI), -1.90--1.10) and Europe (1971-1990; slope = -3.13; CI, -4.96- -1.30), but not in non-Western countries (1978-1989; slope = 1.56; CI, -1.00-4.12). Results from nonlinear models (quadratic and spline) were similar. Thus, further analysis of these studies supports a significant decline in sperm density in the United States and Europe. Confounding and selection bias are unlikely to account for these results. However, some intraregional differences were as large as mean decline in sperm density between 1938 and 1990, and recent reports from Europe and the United States further support large interarea differences in sperm density. Identifying the cause(s) of these regional and temporal differences, whether environmental or other, is clearly warranted.

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9370524      PMCID: PMC1470335          DOI: 10.1289/ehp.971051228

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Health Perspect        ISSN: 0091-6765            Impact factor:   9.031


  41 in total

1.  The male factor in fertility and infertility. V. Effect of continence on semen quality.

Authors:  J MACLEOD; R Z GOLD
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  1952 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 7.329

2.  Variation of semen quality in normal men.

Authors:  C Mallidis; E J Howard; H W Baker
Journal:  Int J Androl       Date:  1991-04

3.  The male factor in fertility and infertility. II. Spermatozoon counts in 1000 men of known fertility and in 1000 cases of infertile marriage.

Authors:  J MACLEOD; R Z GOLD
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1951-09       Impact factor: 7.450

4.  Deterioration of sperm quality in young healthy Belgian men.

Authors:  K Van Waeleghem; N De Clercq; L Vermeulen; F Schoonjans; F Comhaire
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 6.918

5.  Longitudinal study of semen quality of unexposed workers. I. Study overview.

Authors:  S M Schrader; T W Turner; M J Breitenstein; S D Simon
Journal:  Reprod Toxicol       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 3.143

6.  Phthalate esters and semen quality parameters.

Authors:  D A Murature; S Y Tang; G Steinhardt; R C Dougherty
Journal:  Biomed Environ Mass Spectrom       Date:  1987-08

7.  Estimation of number, mean size and size distribution of human spermatozoa in oligospermia using a Coulter counter.

Authors:  J Brotherton; G Barnard
Journal:  J Reprod Fertil       Date:  1974-10

8.  Sperm decline--real or artifact?

Authors:  N Keiding; N E Skakkebaek
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 7.329

9.  Residence in the London area and sperm density.

Authors:  J Ginsburg; S Okolo; G Prelevic; P Hardiman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1994-01-22       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  Falling sperm quality: fact or fiction?

Authors:  S Farrow
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1994-07-02
View more
  85 in total

Review 1.  Infertility: from a personal to a public health problem.

Authors:  A T Fidler; J Bernstein
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  1999 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.792

Review 2.  Are problems with male reproductive health caused by endocrine disruption?

Authors:  M Joffe
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 4.402

Review 3.  Environment and health: 6. Endocrine disruption and potential human health implications.

Authors:  G M Solomon; T Schettler
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2000-11-28       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 4.  Disruption of androgen receptor signaling in males by environmental chemicals.

Authors:  Doug C Luccio-Camelo; Gail S Prins
Journal:  J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol       Date:  2011-04-13       Impact factor: 4.292

5.  Reference limits: limited references in laboratories worldwide.

Authors:  Xue-Feng Huang
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 3.285

6.  Deliveries from embryos fertilized with spermatozoa obtained from cryopreserved testicular tissue.

Authors:  Janos Konc; Katalin Kanyó; Sandor Cseh
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2006-06-20       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 7.  [Impact of lifestyle and environmental factors on male reproductive health].

Authors:  H-C Schuppe; F-M Köhn
Journal:  Hautarzt       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 0.751

Review 8.  Etiologic factors in testicular germ-cell tumors.

Authors:  Katherine A McGlynn; Michael B Cook
Journal:  Future Oncol       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 3.404

9.  The ups and downs of mutation frequencies during aging can account for the Apert syndrome paternal age effect.

Authors:  Song-Ro Yoon; Jian Qin; Rivka L Glaser; Ethylin Wang Jabs; Nancy S Wexler; Rebecca Sokol; Norman Arnheim; Peter Calabrese
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2009-07-10       Impact factor: 5.917

Review 10.  Decreasing sperm quality: a global problem?

Authors:  Hiltrud Merzenich; Hajo Zeeb; Maria Blettner
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2010-01-19       Impact factor: 3.295

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.