Literature DB >> 15236035

Clinical evaluation of esophageal doppler cardiac output measurement during general anesthesia.

M Ueda1, S Yokota, F Nakata, S Kaseno, N Sakuraya, O Kemmotsu.   

Abstract

We evaluate the accuracy of cardiac output measurement with esophageal Doppler ultrasonography (ECO). A total of 71 simultaneous measurement of esophageal Doppler and thermodilution cardiac output were compared in 16 patients undergoing general anesthesia in the supine position. ECO was determined easily with minimal experience, and significantly correlated with thermodilution cardiac output (TDCO) measurement ( P < 0.001). The regression equation obtained was Y = 0.983X + 0.019, and the correlation coefficient was 0.935. Furthermore, ECO was more reproducible than TDCO. However, ECO is not able to assess CO accurately in either lateral or prone position and after cardiopulmonary bypass in open heart surgery. Our results suggest that the esophageal Doppler technique allows a noninvasive and continuous cardiac output monitoring in patients during general anesthesia, and that it is more useful in patients for whom invasive monitoring is considered inappropriate. However, further improvement in this technique will be necessary for its routine use in clinical anesthesia.

Entities:  

Year:  1989        PMID: 15236035     DOI: 10.1007/s0054090030178

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anesth        ISSN: 0913-8668            Impact factor:   2.078


  10 in total

1.  Pulmonary complications of the flow-directed balloon-tipped catheter.

Authors:  G A Foote; S I Schabel; M Hodges
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1974-04-25       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Continuous noninvasive monitoring of cardiac output with esophageal Doppler ultrasound during cardiac surgery.

Authors:  J B Mark; R A Steinbrook; L D Gugino; R Maddi; B Hartwell; R Shemin; V DiSesa; W N Rida
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  1986-10       Impact factor: 5.108

3.  Comparison between ultrasonic and thermodilution cardiac output measurements in intensive care patients.

Authors:  J F Vandenbogaerde; R G Scheldewaert; D L Rijckaert; D L Clement; F A Colardyn
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  1986-04       Impact factor: 7.598

Review 4.  Doppler flow determination.

Authors:  A Vieli
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 9.166

5.  Doppler echocardiographic measurement of cardiac output: comparison with a non-golden standard.

Authors:  A H Schuster; N C Nanda
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1984-01-01       Impact factor: 2.778

6.  Can we trust the direct radial artery pressure immediately following cardiopulmonary bypass?

Authors:  D H Stern; J I Gerson; F B Allen; F B Parker
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1985-05       Impact factor: 7.892

7.  Right bundle-branch block and complete heart block caused by the Swan-Ganz catheter.

Authors:  I R Thomson; B C Dalton; D G Lappas; E Lowenstein
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1979-10       Impact factor: 7.892

8.  Transesophageal Doppler scanning versus thermodilution during general anesthesia. An initial comparison of cardiac output techniques.

Authors:  P R Freund
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1987-05       Impact factor: 2.565

9.  Noninvasive Doppler determination of cardiac output in man. Clinical validation.

Authors:  L L Huntsman; D K Stewart; S R Barnes; S B Franklin; J S Colocousis; E A Hessel
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1983-03       Impact factor: 29.690

10.  Noninvasive measurement of cardiac output by continuous-wave Doppler echocardiography: initial experience and review of the literature.

Authors:  R A Nishimura; M J Callahan; H V Schaff; D M Ilstrup; F A Miller; A J Tajik
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  1984-07       Impact factor: 7.616

  10 in total
  1 in total

Review 1.  Transesophageal Doppler devices: A technical review.

Authors:  Patrick Schober; Stephan A Loer; Lothar A Schwarte
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2009-10-20       Impact factor: 2.502

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.