Literature DB >> 15230830

MEASURE: A proposed assessment framework for developing best practice recommendations for wound assessment.

David H Keast1, C Keith Bowering, A Wayne Evans, Gerald L Mackean, Catherine Burrows, Lincoln D'Souza.   

Abstract

The effective management of nonhealing wounds is based on a complete patient history, a detailed initial assessment of the wound, and an analysis of probable causative factors. This information is used to individualize a management strategy to the underlying pathophysiology preventing healing and to implement appropriate wound interventions. Regular reassessment of progress toward healing and appropriate modification of the intervention are also necessary. Accurate and clinically relevant wound assessment is an important clinical tool, but this process remains a substantial challenge. Wound assessment terminology is nonuniform, many questions surrounding wound assessment remain unanswered, agreement has yet to be reached on the key wound parameters to measure in clinical practice, and the accuracy and reliability of available wound assessment techniques vary. This article, which resulted from a meeting of wound healing experts in June 2003, reviews clinically useful wound measurement approaches, provides an overview of the principles and practice of chronic wound assessment geared to a clinical audience, and introduces a simple mnemonic, MEASURE. MEASURE encapsulates key wound parameters that should be addressed in the assessment and management of chronic wounds: Measure (length, width, depth, and area), Exudate (quantity and quality), Appearance (wound bed, including tissue type and amount), Suffering (pain type and level), Undermining (presence or absence), Reevaluate (monitoring of all parameters regularly), and Edge (condition of edge and surrounding skin). This article also provides some preliminary recommendations targeted to developing best practice guidelines for wound assessment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15230830     DOI: 10.1111/j.1067-1927.2004.0123S1.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Wound Repair Regen        ISSN: 1067-1927            Impact factor:   3.617


  30 in total

1.  Comparative analysis of two methods for wound bed area measurement.

Authors:  Sven Van Poucke; Roald Nelissen; Philippe Jorens; Yves Vander Haeghen
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 3.315

Review 2.  Evolution or revolution? Adapting to complexity in wound management.

Authors:  Keith Harding; David Gray; John Timmons; Theresa Hurd
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 3.315

3.  Comparing visual and objective skin assessment with pressure injury risk.

Authors:  Caroline J Borzdynski; William McGuiness; Charne Miller
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2015-07-15       Impact factor: 3.315

4.  Evidenced-based management of a chronic wound in an elderly female patient with type II diabetes.

Authors:  Ethne L Nussbaum
Journal:  Physiother Can       Date:  2010-04-23       Impact factor: 1.037

Review 5.  Care of chronic wounds in palliative care and end-of-life patients.

Authors:  Christine A Chrisman
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2010-05-28       Impact factor: 3.315

6.  A consensus approach to wound care in epidermolysis bullosa.

Authors:  Elena Pope; Irene Lara-Corrales; Jemima Mellerio; Anna Martinez; Gregory Schultz; Robert Burrell; Laurie Goodman; Patricia Coutts; John Wagner; Upton Allen; Gary Sibbald
Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol       Date:  2012-03-02       Impact factor: 11.527

7.  Quality of measurements of acute surgical and traumatic wounds using a digital wound-analysing tool.

Authors:  Dymmie Lc Landa; Anne-Margreet van Dishoeck; Ewout W Steyerberg; Steven Er Hovius
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2014-08-14       Impact factor: 3.315

8.  Assessment and documentation of non-healing, chronic wounds in inpatient health care facilities in the Czech Republic: an evaluation study.

Authors:  Andrea Pokorná; David Leaper
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2014-09-16       Impact factor: 3.315

9.  Oxygen tension assessment: an overlooked tool for prediction of delayed healing in a clinical setting.

Authors:  Rajna Ogrin; Michael Woodward; Geoff Sussman; Zeinab Khalil
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 3.315

10.  Evaluation of a Novel Three-Dimensional Wound Measurement Device for Assessment of Diabetic Foot Ulcers.

Authors:  Guilherme Pena; Beatrice Kuang; Zygmunt Szpak; Prue Cowled; Joseph Dawson; Robert Fitridge
Journal:  Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle)       Date:  2019-10-23       Impact factor: 4.730

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.