Literature DB >> 25224308

Assessment and documentation of non-healing, chronic wounds in inpatient health care facilities in the Czech Republic: an evaluation study.

Andrea Pokorná1, David Leaper.   

Abstract

The foundation of health care management of patients with non-healing, chronic wounds needs accurate evaluation followed by the selection of an appropriate therapeutic strategy. Assessment of non-healing, chronic wounds in clinical practice in the Czech Republic is not standardised. The aim of this study was to analyse the methods being used to assess non-healing, chronic wounds in inpatient facilities in the Czech Republic. The research was carried out at 77 inpatient medical facilities (8 university/faculty hospitals, 63 hospitals and 6 long- term hospitals) across all regions of the Czech Republic. A mixed model was used for the research (participatory observation including creation of field notes and content analysis of documents for documentation and analysis of qualitative and quantitative data). The results of this research have corroborated the suspicion of inconsistencies in procedures used by general nurses for assessment of non-healing, chronic wounds. However, the situation was found to be more positive with regard to evaluation of basic/fundamental parameters of a wound (e.g. size, depth and location of a wound) compared with the evaluation of more specific parameters (e.g. exudate or signs of infection). This included not only the number of observed variables, but also the action taken. Both were significantly improved when a consultant for wound healing was present (P = 0·047). The same applied to facilities possessing a certificate of quality issued by the Czech Wound Management Association (P = 0·010). In conclusion, an effective strategy for wound management depends on the method and scope of the assessment of non-healing, chronic wounds in place in clinical practice in observed facilities; improvement may be expected following the general introduction of a 'non-healing, chronic wound assessment' algorithm.
© 2014 The Authors. International Wound Journal © 2014 Medicalhelplines.com Inc and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Chronic wounds; Clinical guidelines; Nursing practice; Wound assessment; Wound management

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25224308      PMCID: PMC7950913          DOI: 10.1111/iwj.12372

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Wound J        ISSN: 1742-4801            Impact factor:   3.315


  33 in total

1.  Cost of wound treatment to increase significantly in Denmark over the next decade.

Authors:  A Hjort; F Gottrup
Journal:  J Wound Care       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 2.072

2.  Guideline adaptation: an approach to enhance efficiency in guideline development and improve utilisation.

Authors:  B Fervers; J S Burgers; R Voellinger; M Brouwers; G P Browman; I D Graham; M B Harrison; J Latreille; N Mlika-Cabane; L Paquet; L Zitzelsberger; B Burnand
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2011-01-05       Impact factor: 7.035

Review 3.  Do topical analgesics reduce pain associated with wound dressing changes or debridement of chronic wounds?

Authors:  Elizabeth Evans; Mikel Gray
Journal:  J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs       Date:  2005 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.741

Review 4.  Wound bed preparation and a brief history of TIME.

Authors:  Gregory S Schultz; David J Barillo; David W Mozingo; Gloria A Chin
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 3.315

5.  Measuring wound length, width, and area: which technique?

Authors:  Diane Langemo; Julie Anderson; Darlene Hanson; Susan Hunter; Patricia Thompson
Journal:  Adv Skin Wound Care       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 2.347

Review 6.  An overview of techniques used to measure wound area and volume.

Authors:  C Little; J McDonald; M G Jenkins; P McCarron
Journal:  J Wound Care       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 2.072

7.  Quantifying wound fluids for the clinician and researcher.

Authors:  G D Mulder
Journal:  Ostomy Wound Manage       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 2.629

8.  Methods for assessing change in ulcer status.

Authors:  K G Harding
Journal:  Adv Wound Care       Date:  1995 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.730

Review 9.  Extending the TIME concept: what have we learned in the past 10 years?(*).

Authors:  David J Leaper; Gregory Schultz; Keryln Carville; Jacqueline Fletcher; Theresa Swanson; Rebecca Drake
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 3.315

Review 10.  Nursing record systems: effects on nursing practice and healthcare outcomes.

Authors:  Christine Urquhart; Rosemary Currell; Maria J Grant; Nicholas R Hardiker
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2009-01-21
View more
  2 in total

1.  Machine Learning-Based Pressure Ulcer Prediction in Modular Critical Care Data.

Authors:  Petr Šín; Alica Hokynková; Nováková Marie; Pokorná Andrea; Rostislav Krč; Jan Podroužek
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-30

2.  Epidemiology and disease burden of complex wounds for inpatients in China: an observational study from Sichuan province.

Authors:  Qingling Jiang; Jo C Dumville; Nicky Cullum; Jay Pan; Zhenmi Liu
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-11-06       Impact factor: 2.692

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.