Literature DB >> 29128392

Adrenergic manipulation inhibits pavlovian conditioned approach behaviors.

Kyle Z Pasquariello1, Marina Han2, Cagla Unal3, Paul J Meyer1.   

Abstract

Environmental rewards and Pavlovian reward cues can acquire incentive salience, thereby eliciting incentive motivational states and instigate reward-seeking. In rats, the incentive salience of food cues can be measured during a Pavlovian conditioned approach paradigm, in which rats engage in cue-directed approach ("sign-tracking") or approach the food delivery location ("goal-tracking"). While it has been shown that dopamine signaling is necessary for sign-tracking, some studies have suggested that norepinephrine is involved in learning to sign-track as well. Thus, in order to investigate the influence of norepinephrine in Pavlovian conditioned approach, we administered three adrenergic drugs while rats learned that a food cue (an illuminated, retractable lever) preceded the delivery of banana-flavored food pellets into a food-cup. We found that pre-session injections of disulfiram (a dopamine-β-hydroxylase inhibitor) inhibited the development of sign-tracking, but goal-tracking was only affected at the high dose. In one experiment, post-session injections of disulfiram blocked the development of sign-tracking, although this effect was not replicated in a separate set of rats. Post-session injections of prazosin (an α1-adrenergic receptor antagonist) and propranolol (a β-adrenergic receptor antagonist) also blocked the development of sign-tracking but not goal-tracking. Taken together, these results suggest that adrenergic transmission mediates the acquisition of sign-tracking but not goal-tracking, and thus plays a selective role in the attribution of incentive salience food cues.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29128392      PMCID: PMC5729111          DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2017.10.037

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Brain Res        ISSN: 0166-4328            Impact factor:   3.332


  64 in total

1.  Reconsolidation of appetitive memories for both natural and drug reinforcement is dependent on {beta}-adrenergic receptors.

Authors:  Amy L Milton; Jonathan L C Lee; Barry J Everitt
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2008-01-29       Impact factor: 2.460

2.  Disentangling pleasure from incentive salience and learning signals in brain reward circuitry.

Authors:  Kyle S Smith; Kent C Berridge; J Wayne Aldridge
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-06-13       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Dopamine and noradrenaline release in the prefrontal cortex of rats during classical aversive and appetitive conditioning to a contextual stimulus: interference by novelty effects.

Authors:  M G Feenstra; G Teske; M H Botterblom; J P De Bruin
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  1999-09-17       Impact factor: 3.046

4.  A motivational view of learning, performance, and behavior modification.

Authors:  D Bindra
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1974-05       Impact factor: 8.934

5.  Incubation of cue-induced cigarette craving during abstinence in human smokers.

Authors:  Gillinder Bedi; Kenzie L Preston; David H Epstein; Stephen J Heishman; Gina F Marrone; Yavin Shaham; Harriet de Wit
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2011-04-01       Impact factor: 13.382

6.  Individual differences in food cue responsivity are associated with acute and repeated cocaine-induced vocalizations, but not cue-induced vocalizations.

Authors:  Jordan A Tripi; Micheal L Dent; Paul J Meyer
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2016-11-11       Impact factor: 4.530

7.  Impaired memory consolidation in rats produced with beta-adrenergic blockade.

Authors:  L Cahill; C A Pham; B Setlow
Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 2.877

Review 8.  Revisiting propranolol and PTSD: Memory erasure or extinction enhancement?

Authors:  Thomas F Giustino; Paul J Fitzgerald; Stephen Maren
Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem       Date:  2016-01-22       Impact factor: 2.877

9.  Reconsolidation and extinction are dissociable and mutually exclusive processes: behavioral and molecular evidence.

Authors:  Emiliano Merlo; Amy L Milton; Zara Y Goozée; David E Theobald; Barry J Everitt
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-02-12       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Intra-amygdala and systemic antagonism of NMDA receptors prevents the reconsolidation of drug-associated memory and impairs subsequently both novel and previously acquired drug-seeking behaviors.

Authors:  Amy L Milton; Jonathan L C Lee; Victoria J Butler; Richard Gardner; Barry J Everitt
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2008-08-13       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.