Literature DB >> 15217416

Open versus laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: part I.

Laurent Salomon1, Philippe Sèbe, Alexandre De la Taille, Dimitri Vordos, Andras Hoznek, René Yiou, Dominique Chopin, Claude C Abbou.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  2004        PMID： 15217416     DOI： 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2004.04950.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJU Int        ISSN： 1464-4096            Impact factor:   5.588


× No keyword cloud information.
  13 in total

Review 1.  Oncological and functional results of open, robot-assisted and laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: does surgical approach and surgical experience matter?

Authors:  T R Herrmann; R Rabenalt; J U Stolzenburg; E N Liatsikos; F Imkamp; H Tezval; A J Gross; U Jonas; M Burchardt
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2007-03-13       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 2.  Robot-assisted versus pure laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Francois Rozet; Justin Harmon; Xavier Cathelineau; Eric Barret; Guy Vallancien
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2006-03-17       Impact factor: 4.226

3.  Single-centre study comparing standard apical dissection with a modified technique to facilitate vesico-urethral anastomosis during laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Xin Gao; Xiao-Yong Pu; Jie Si-Tu; Wen-Tao Huang
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2011-02-07       Impact factor: 3.285

4.  Radical perineal prostatectomy: a more optimal treatment approach than laparoscopic radical prostatectomy in obese patients?

Authors:  Albert C Leung; Arnold Melman
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2005

5.  Assessment of low prostate weight as a determinant of a higher positive margin rate after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a prospective pathologic study of 1,500 cases.

Authors:  Peiguo G Chu; Sean K Lau; Lawrence M Weiss; Mark Kawachi; Jeffrey Yoshida; Christopher Ruel; Rebecca Nelson; Laura Crocitto; Timothy Wilson
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-09-24       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 6.  Management of the complications of radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Penner Schraudenbach; Carlos E Bermejo
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 3.092

7.  Laparoscopic versus open bilateral intrafascial nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy after TUR-P for incidental prostate cancer: surgical outcomes and effect on postoperative urinary continence and sexual potency.

Authors:  Christopher Springer; Antonino Inferrera; Giovannalberto Pini; Nasreldin Mohammed; Paolo Fornara; Francesco Greco
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2013-02-12       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 8.  Management of complications of prostate cancer treatment.

Authors:  M Dror Michaelson; Shane E Cotter; Patricio C Gargollo; Anthony L Zietman; Douglas M Dahl; Matthew R Smith
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2008-05-23       Impact factor: 508.702

9.  Complications, urinary continence, and oncologic outcomes of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: single-surgeon experience for the first 100 cases.

Authors:  Takashi Imamoto; Yusuke Goto; Takanobu Utsumi; Miki Fuse; Koji Kawamura; Naoto Kamiya; Yukio Naya; Hiroyoshi Suzuki; Yukihiro Kondo; Tomohiko Ichikawa
Journal:  Prostate Cancer       Date:  2011-07-14

10.  Preliminary results for continence recovery after intrafascial extraperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Young Hoon Choi; Jeong Zoo Lee; Moon Kee Chung; Hong Koo Ha
Journal:  Korean J Urol       Date:  2012-12-20
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.