BACKGROUND: Soon after its introduction, laparoscopic adrenalectomy (LA) became the procedure of choice in the surgical management of most adrenal tumors. The aim of this study was to assess the outcome and learning curve of the first 100 cases operated by the same surgical team. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data of 100 consecutive LAs was performed. The parameters studied were indication for surgery, side and length of operation, intra- and postoperative complications, size of tumor, conversion to open surgery, final diagnosis, and length of stay. RESULTS: Between 1996 and 2002, 100 LAs were performed in 90 patients. The procedures included 45 left, 35 right, and 10 bilateral resections for pheochromocytoma (29), Cushings syndrome (27), Conns syndrome (16), nonfunctioning adenoma (13), and others (5). Mean tumor size was 4.16 cm (range, 0.3-11). Overall major morbidity occurred in eight patients (9%); there was one mortality due to cerebrovascular accident in an elderly patient. Five cases (5%) were converted to open surgery. The mean length of stay for the whole group was 4.7 days (range, 2-25). In order to assess the learning curve, procedures were divided into three, equal consecutive groups (n = 33, 33, and 34). Intraoperative complications in the intermediate and late groups were significantly less compared to those in the early group (2/33, 2/34, and 7/33, respectively; (p < 0.05). Similarly, the mean operating time was significantly reduced between the early (169 min) and both intermediate (116 min) and late (127 min) groups (p < 0.005). The conversion rate was reduced between the three groups (3/33, 2/33, and 0/34), but this was not significant (p = 0.06). CONCLUSIONS: As expected, the outcome of LA is associated with a steep learning curve. According to this study, it seems that performance of approximately 30 cases by an experienced laparoscopic surgeon is required to master the procedure.
BACKGROUND: Soon after its introduction, laparoscopic adrenalectomy (LA) became the procedure of choice in the surgical management of most adrenal tumors. The aim of this study was to assess the outcome and learning curve of the first 100 cases operated by the same surgical team. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data of 100 consecutive LAs was performed. The parameters studied were indication for surgery, side and length of operation, intra- and postoperative complications, size of tumor, conversion to open surgery, final diagnosis, and length of stay. RESULTS: Between 1996 and 2002, 100 LAs were performed in 90 patients. The procedures included 45 left, 35 right, and 10 bilateral resections for pheochromocytoma (29), Cushings syndrome (27), Conns syndrome (16), nonfunctioning adenoma (13), and others (5). Mean tumor size was 4.16 cm (range, 0.3-11). Overall major morbidity occurred in eight patients (9%); there was one mortality due to cerebrovascular accident in an elderly patient. Five cases (5%) were converted to open surgery. The mean length of stay for the whole group was 4.7 days (range, 2-25). In order to assess the learning curve, procedures were divided into three, equal consecutive groups (n = 33, 33, and 34). Intraoperative complications in the intermediate and late groups were significantly less compared to those in the early group (2/33, 2/34, and 7/33, respectively; (p < 0.05). Similarly, the mean operating time was significantly reduced between the early (169 min) and both intermediate (116 min) and late (127 min) groups (p < 0.005). The conversion rate was reduced between the three groups (3/33, 2/33, and 0/34), but this was not significant (p = 0.06). CONCLUSIONS: As expected, the outcome of LA is associated with a steep learning curve. According to this study, it seems that performance of approximately 30 cases by an experienced laparoscopic surgeon is required to master the procedure.
Authors: Marco Barreca; Luigi Presenti; Cristina Renzi; Giuseppe Cavallaro; Andrea Borrelli; Francesco Stipa; Andrea Valeri Journal: World J Surg Date: 2003-02 Impact factor: 3.352
Authors: Mihir M Desai; Inderbir S Gill; Jihad H Kaouk; Surena F Matin; Gyung Tak Sung; Emmanuel L Bravo Journal: Urology Date: 2002-12 Impact factor: 2.649
Authors: Antonio M Lacy; Juan C García-Valdecasas; Salvadora Delgado; Antoni Castells; Pilar Taurá; Josep M Piqué; Josep Visa Journal: Lancet Date: 2002-06-29 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Jens Rassweiler; Alexander Tsivian; A V Ravi Kumar; Christos Lymberakis; Micheal Schulze; Othmar Seeman; Thomas Frede Journal: J Urol Date: 2003-06 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: Sandra Sommerey; Yalda Foroghi; Costanza Chiapponi; Sebastian F Baumbach; Klaus K J Hallfeldt; Roland Ladurner; Julia K S Gallwas Journal: Langenbecks Arch Surg Date: 2015-02-27 Impact factor: 3.445
Authors: Antonio Toniato; Isabella Boschin; Paolo Bernante; Mirto Foletto; Anna Maria Guolo; Maria Rosa Pelizzo; Giuseppe Opocher; Enzo Ballotta; Franco Mantero Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2008-07-15 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: Dimitrios Stefanidis; Melanie Goldfarb; Kent W Kercher; William W Hope; William Richardson; Robert D Fanelli Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2013-09-10 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: Deron J Tessier; Rafael Iglesias; William C Chapman; Kent Kercher; Brent D Matthews; D Lee Gorden; L Michael Brunt Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2008-04-29 Impact factor: 4.584