BACKGROUND:Laparoscopy is commonly recognized as the gold standard in adrenal surgery. The most used surgical access is at present the so-called flank approach. The aim of this study was to compare the flank approach and the anterior sub-mesocolic access carrying out left laparoscopic adrenalectomy (LA). METHODS:From January 2003 to January 2006 50 eligible left LAs were randomized to the flank (n = 25, group A) or sub-mesocolic transperitoneal approach (n = 25, group B). The two groups were similar concerning patient and lesion features. Comparing the two approaches, the main parameters analyzed, adjusted for tumor size and histology, were operating time (OpT), complication rate, and hospital stay. RESULTS: There were no converted procedures. Mean overall OpT was 76.4 min (54-96 min) versus 65.6 min (45-95 min) in group A and B, respectively (p = 0.001), while the OpT required to tie the adrenal vein was 42.8 min (26-55 min) and 24.5 min (16-41 min) (p = 0.000). Oral feeding resumed within 12-24 h in both groups. Mean hospital stay was 3 and 2.4 days in groups A and B, respectively (p = 0.04). Mean tumor size was similar in group A and B: 3.6 cm (1.5-6.5 cm) and 3.8 cm (2-6 cm), respectively. Definitive histology in groups A and B were: Cushing adenoma (6 and 4), Conn adenoma (5 and 6), pheochromocytoma (4 and 9), and incidentaloma (8 and 5, respectively). A myelolipoma and an adrenogenital adenoma were observed in group A and one carcinoma was observed in group B. CONCLUSIONS: Sub-mesocolic approach provides a statistically significant shorter OpT and hospital stay. Identification and early closure of the adrenal vein by means of a really minimal dissection and no-touch gland technique resulted in the main benefits of this approach.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Laparoscopy is commonly recognized as the gold standard in adrenal surgery. The most used surgical access is at present the so-called flank approach. The aim of this study was to compare the flank approach and the anterior sub-mesocolic access carrying out left laparoscopic adrenalectomy (LA). METHODS: From January 2003 to January 2006 50 eligible left LAs were randomized to the flank (n = 25, group A) or sub-mesocolic transperitoneal approach (n = 25, group B). The two groups were similar concerning patient and lesion features. Comparing the two approaches, the main parameters analyzed, adjusted for tumor size and histology, were operating time (OpT), complication rate, and hospital stay. RESULTS: There were no converted procedures. Mean overall OpT was 76.4 min (54-96 min) versus 65.6 min (45-95 min) in group A and B, respectively (p = 0.001), while the OpT required to tie the adrenal vein was 42.8 min (26-55 min) and 24.5 min (16-41 min) (p = 0.000). Oral feeding resumed within 12-24 h in both groups. Mean hospital stay was 3 and 2.4 days in groups A and B, respectively (p = 0.04). Mean tumor size was similar in group A and B: 3.6 cm (1.5-6.5 cm) and 3.8 cm (2-6 cm), respectively. Definitive histology in groups A and B were: Cushing adenoma (6 and 4), Conn adenoma (5 and 6), pheochromocytoma (4 and 9), and incidentaloma (8 and 5, respectively). A myelolipoma and an adrenogenital adenoma were observed in group A and one carcinoma was observed in group B. CONCLUSIONS: Sub-mesocolic approach provides a statistically significant shorter OpT and hospital stay. Identification and early closure of the adrenal vein by means of a really minimal dissection and no-touch gland technique resulted in the main benefits of this approach.
Authors: Chi Kin Tai; Shu Keung Li; See Ming Hou; Chi Wai Fan; Tat Chau Fung; Michael Ka Wah Journal: Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech Date: 2006-06 Impact factor: 1.719
Authors: L Salomon; M Soulié; P Mouly; F Saint; A Cicco; E Olsson; A Hoznek; P Antiphon; D Chopin; P Plante; C C Abbou Journal: J Urol Date: 2001-07 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: Mario Zacharias; Alexander Haese; Andreas Jurczok; Jens-Uwe Stolzenburg; Paolo Fornara Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2006-01-30 Impact factor: 20.096
Authors: M Pross; T Manger; F Heres; S Klose; H Lehnert; K Ridwelski; S Wolff; R Mantke; F Marusch; H Lippert Journal: Zentralbl Chir Date: 2002-07 Impact factor: 0.942
Authors: Dimitrios Stefanidis; Melanie Goldfarb; Kent W Kercher; William W Hope; William Richardson; Robert D Fanelli Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2013-09-10 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: Alessandro M Paganini; Andrea Balla; Mario Guerrieri; Giovanni Lezoche; Roberto Campagnacci; Giancarlo D'Ambrosio; Silvia Quaresima; Maria Vittoria Antonica; Emanuele Lezoche Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2014-04-16 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: R Campagnacci; F Crosta; A De Sanctis; M Baldarelli; G Giacchetti; A M Paganini; M Coletta; M Guerrieri Journal: J Endocrinol Invest Date: 2009-01 Impact factor: 4.256