Literature DB >> 15215301

Responses of dorsal cochlear nucleus neurons to signals in the presence of modulated maskers.

Veronika Neuert1, Jesko L Verhey, Ian M Winter.   

Abstract

The detection of a signal in noise is enhanced when the masking noise is coherently modulated over a wide range of frequencies. This phenomenon, known as comodulation masking release (CMR), has been attributed to across-channel processing; however, the relative contribution of different stages in the auditory system to such across-channel processing is unknown. It has been hypothesized that wideband or lateral inhibition may underlie a physiological correlate of CMR. To further test this hypothesis, we have measured the responses of single units from the dorsal cochlear nucleus in which wideband inhibition is particularly pronounced. Using a sinusoidally amplitude-modulated tone at the best frequency of each unit as a masker, a pure-tone signal was added in the dips of the masker modulation. Flanking bands (FBs, also amplitude-modulated pure tones) were positioned to fall within the inhibitory sidebands of the receptive field of the unit. The FBs were either in phase (comodulated) or out of phase (codeviant) with the on-frequency masker. For the majority of units, the addition of the comodulated FBs produced a strong reduction in the response to the masker modulation, making the signal more salient in the post stimulus time histograms. The change in spike rate in response to the signal between the masker and signal-plus-masker conditions was greatest for the comodulated condition for 29 of 45 units. These results are consistent with the hypothesis that wideband inhibition may play a role in across-channel processing at an early stage in the auditory pathway.

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15215301      PMCID: PMC6729215          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0450-04.2004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  12 in total

1.  Superposition of masking releases.

Authors:  Bastian Epp; Jesko L Verhey
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2008-11-28       Impact factor: 1.621

2.  Auditory stream formation affects comodulation masking release retroactively.

Authors:  Torsten Dau; Stephan Ewert; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Masking Differentially Affects Envelope-following Responses in Young and Aged Animals.

Authors:  Jesyin Lai; Edward L Bartlett
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2018-06-25       Impact factor: 3.590

4.  Comodulation masking release in the inferior colliculus by combined signal enhancement and masker reduction.

Authors:  Jan-Philipp Diepenbrock; Marcus Jeschke; Frank W Ohl; Jesko Verhey
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-10-26       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Masking release for sweeping masker components with correlated envelopes.

Authors:  Jesko L Verhey; Hendrike Klein-Hennig; Bastian Epp
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2012-09-28

6.  Detection of modulated tones in modulated noise by non-human primates.

Authors:  Peter Bohlen; Margit Dylla; Courtney Timms; Ramnarayan Ramachandran
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2014-06-05

Review 7.  The cocktail party problem: what is it? How can it be solved? And why should animal behaviorists study it?

Authors:  Mark A Bee; Christophe Micheyl
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 2.231

8.  Efferent pathways modulate hyperactivity in inferior colliculus.

Authors:  Wilhelmina Henrica A M Mulders; Kumar Seluakumaran; Donald Robertson
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-07-14       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Effects of noise bandwidth and amplitude modulation on masking in frog auditory midbrain neurons.

Authors:  Jozien B M Goense; Albert S Feng
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-02-10       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Enhancement of forward suppression begins in the ventral cochlear nucleus.

Authors:  Neil J Ingham; Naoya Itatani; Stefan Bleeck; Ian M Winter
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2016-03-02       Impact factor: 3.252

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.