Literature DB >> 15215068

Hand differences in the rate and variability of rapid tapping.

J I Todor1, P M Kyprie.   

Abstract

Hand differences in the rate and variability of rapid tapping were evaluated for the intertap interval and its constituents-the key depression and key release phases of each tap. To accentuate potential hand differences, only subjects with a clear manual superiority in one hand were included. Relative manual proficiency on Fitts' reciprocal tapping task was used to exclude individuals with less-defined hand superiority or dominance, and to categorize subjects as having a dominant left (n=13) or right (n=11) hand. Analysis of variance indicated the dominant hand to have a shorter average intertap interval and thus a faster tapping rate. This hand difference in rate was found to be significant for the key-depression phase, but not the key-release.phase, of the tap. In each handedness group the dominant hand exhibited less variability in the intertap interval and both constituents. Potential associations of these findings with hemispheric asymmetries in sequential ability are discussed.

Entities:  

Year:  1980        PMID: 15215068     DOI: 10.1080/00222895.1980.10735205

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mot Behav        ISSN: 0022-2895            Impact factor:   1.328


  21 in total

1.  Interlimb differences in control of movement extent.

Authors:  Robert L Sainburg; Sydney Y Schaefer
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2004-04-28       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  An investigation into manual asymmetries in grasp behavior and kinematics during an object manipulation task.

Authors:  Christian Seegelke; Charmayne M L Hughes; Thomas Schack
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-09-22       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Handedness and index finger movements performed on a small touchscreen.

Authors:  Tomoko Aoki; Gil Rivlis; Marc H Schieber
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-12-16       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Evidence for asymmetric inhibitory activity during motor planning phases of sensorimotor synchronization.

Authors:  Andrew R Mayer; Faith M Hanlon; Nicholas A Shaff; David D Stephenson; Josef M Ling; Andrew B Dodd; Jeremy Hogeveen; Davin K Quinn; Sephira G Ryman; Sarah Pirio-Richardson
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2020-05-15       Impact factor: 4.027

Review 5.  Sensorimotor synchronization: a review of the tapping literature.

Authors:  Bruno H Repp
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2005-12

6.  Hand dominance and multi-finger synergies.

Authors:  Wei Zhang; Robert L Sainburg; Vladimir M Zatsiorsky; Mark L Latash
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2006-10-02       Impact factor: 3.046

7.  Control of the dominant and nondominant hand: exploitation and taming of nonmuscular forces.

Authors:  Herbert Heuer
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-11-14       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Task-dependent asymmetries in the utilization of proprioceptive feedback for goal-directed movement.

Authors:  Daniel J Goble; Susan H Brown
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-02-13       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Symmetry, broken symmetry, and handedness in bimanual coordination dynamics.

Authors:  P J Treffner; M T Turvey
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Motor asymmetry in elite fencers.

Authors:  Selcuk Akpinar; Robert L Sainburg; Sadettin Kirazci; Andrzej Przybyla
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  2014-12-12       Impact factor: 1.328

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.