Literature DB >> 15213497

Tricortical versus quadricortical syndesmosis fixation in ankle fractures: a prospective, randomized study comparing two methods of syndesmosis fixation.

Per Høiness1, Knut Strømsøe.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess short-term functional results in 2 types of syn-desmotic fixation, comparing the traditional rigid quadricortical syndesmotic screw fixation with a more dynamic tricortical screw fixation.
DESIGN: : Prospective, randomized clinical study.
SETTING: University clinic, level 1 trauma center. PATIENTS: Sixty-four patients with closed ankle fractures in which the syndesmosis was found to be unstable intraoperatively. INTERVENTION: The unstable syndesmoses were fixed with either one 4.5-mm cortical screw through both tibial cortices (n = 30) or two 3.5-mm cortical screws engaging only 1 cortex of the tibia (n = 34). The quadricortical screws were routinely removed after 2 months, whereas the tricortical screws were removed only in the case of discomfort. Rehabilitation was the same in both groups.
RESULTS: The Olerud Molander functional score (0-100) was significantly higher in the tricortical group (77 points) compared with the quadricortical group (66 points) (P = 0.025) at 3 months. After 1 year, however, the functional score was not significantly higher (P = 0.192) in the tricortical group (92.6 points) compared with the quadricortical group (85.7 points). Pain was significantly lower in the tricortical group (P = 0.017) after 3 months, but there was no significant difference after 1 year. There was no significant difference in dorsiflexion between the groups at any point of time. No losses of fixation were detected. The tricortical screws were removed in 2 patients due to migration.
CONCLUSIONS: Syndesmosis fixation with 2 tricortical screws is safe and improves early function. After 1 year, however, there were no significant differences between the 2 groups in functional score, pain, and dorsiflexion.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15213497     DOI: 10.1097/00005131-200407000-00001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Trauma        ISSN: 0890-5339            Impact factor:   2.512


  33 in total

Review 1.  [Is routine implant removal after trauma surgery sensible?].

Authors:  C Krettek; C Müller; R Meller; M Jagodzinski; F Hildebrand; R Gaulke
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 1.000

Review 2.  Conservative and surgical management of acute isolated syndesmotic injuries: ESSKA-AFAS consensus and guidelines.

Authors:  C Niek van Dijk; Umile Giuseppe Longo; Mattia Loppini; Pino Florio; Ludovica Maltese; Mauro Ciuffreda; Vincenzo Denaro
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-02-04       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Reply to Letter regarding article by Wang et al: "Internal fixation of distal tibiofibular syndesmotic injuries: a systematic review with meta-analysis".

Authors:  Chen Wang; Xin Ma; Xu Wang; Jiazhang Huang; Chao Zhang; Li Chen; Jian Xu
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-10-11       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 4.  [Problems and controversies in the treatment of ankle fractures].

Authors:  S Rammelt; D Heim; L C Hofbauer; R Grass; H Zwipp
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 1.000

Review 5.  An update on the evaluation and treatment of syndesmotic injuries.

Authors:  S Rammelt; P Obruba
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2014-11-12       Impact factor: 3.693

6.  Reply to comment on Schepers: acute distal tibiofibular syndesmosis injury: a systematic review of suture-button versus syndesmotic screw repair.

Authors:  Tim Schepers
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2012-11-21       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  Comment on Schepers: acute distal tibiofibular syndesmosis injury: a systematic review of suture-button versus syndesmotic screw repair.

Authors:  Tyler Van Heest
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2012-11-21       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 8.  Syndesmosis and deltoid ligament injuries in the athlete.

Authors:  Graham A McCollum; Michel P J van den Bekerom; Gino M M J Kerkhoffs; James D F Calder; C Niek van Dijk
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-10-07       Impact factor: 4.342

9.  Reply to the letter to the editor: is stability of the proximal tibiofibular joint important in the multiligament-injured knee?

Authors:  Michael Jabara
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-06-05       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  The use of TightRope fixation for ankle syndesmosis injuries: our experience.

Authors:  M Bondi; N Rossi; A Pizzoli; L Renzi Brivio
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2016-08-27
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.