Literature DB >> 1521308

An in vivo comparison of radiographic and directly assessed clinical caries status of posterior approximal surfaces in primary and permanent teeth.

N B Pitts1, P A Rimmer.   

Abstract

At general dental practices in Scotland 211 children between the ages of 5 and 15 years were examined by 1 observer. A comparison of the status of 1,468 permanent and 756 primary posterior approximal surfaces was made on the basis of their appearance on posterior bite-wing radiographs and the findings of a direct in vivo visual examination, made after temporary tooth separation had been achieved over 1 week using elastomeric separation. For permanent tooth surfaces, 0% of radiolucencies in the outer half of enamel, 10.5% in the inner half of enamel, 40.9% extending to the outer half of dentine, and 100% extending to the inner half of the dentine were found clinically to be cavitated. The analogous results for primary teeth were that 2.0, 2.9, 28.3, and 95.5%, respectively, of radiolucencies appeared to be cavitated. Although further research with larger numbers of permanent teeth is indicated, these results may contribute to a re-evaluation of the optimal threshold for restorative intervention at approximal sites. Greater numbers of approximal radiolucencies and carious lesions (p less than 0.001) were found in those surfaces which initially had a normal anatomical contact when compared to those which did not.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1521308     DOI: 10.1159/000261500

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Caries Res        ISSN: 0008-6568            Impact factor:   4.056


  17 in total

1.  Approximal morphology as predictor of approximal caries in primary molar teeth.

Authors:  A Cortes; S Martignon; V Qvist; Kim Rud Ekstrand
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2017-07-22       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Detection of cavitated approximal surfaces using cone beam CT and intraoral receptors.

Authors:  A Wenzel; E Hirsch; J Christensen; L H Matzen; G Scaf; M Frydenberg
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2012-07-27       Impact factor: 2.419

3.  In vivo near-IR imaging of approximal dental decay at 1,310 nm.

Authors:  Michal Staninec; Chulsung Lee; Cynthia L Darling; Daniel Fried
Journal:  Lasers Surg Med       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 4.025

4.  Assessment of cavitation in artificial approximal dental lesions with near-IR imaging.

Authors:  Jacob C Simon; Cynthia L Darling; Daniel Fried
Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng       Date:  2017-02-08

5.  Silver diamine fluoride and glass ionomer differentially remineralize early caries lesions, in situ.

Authors:  Ratichanok Nantanee; Busayarat Santiwong; Chutima Trairatvorakul; Hidenori Hamba; Junji Tagami
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2015-09-23       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 6.  Association between malocclusion and dental caries in adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  A C Sá-Pinto; T M Rego; L S Marques; C C Martins; M L Ramos-Jorge; J Ramos-Jorge
Journal:  Eur Arch Paediatr Dent       Date:  2018-03-28

7.  Enhancing the detection of proximal cavities on near infrared transillumination images with Indocyanine Green (ICG) as a contrast medium: In vitro proof of concept studies.

Authors:  Marwa Abdelaziz; Ivo Krejci; Daniel Fried
Journal:  J Dent       Date:  2019-11-02       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Effect of computer assistance on observer performance of approximal caries diagnosis using intraoral digital radiography.

Authors:  Kazuyuki Araki; Yukiko Matsuda; Kenji Seki; Tomohiro Okano
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2009-06-26       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 9.  Detection and monitoring of early caries lesions: a review.

Authors:  I A Pretty; K R Ekstrand
Journal:  Eur Arch Paediatr Dent       Date:  2015-10-29

10.  Current status of dental caries diagnosis using cone beam computed tomography.

Authors:  Young-Seok Park; Jin-Soo Ahn; Ho-Beom Kwon; Seung-Pyo Lee
Journal:  Imaging Sci Dent       Date:  2011-06-23
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.