I A Pretty1, K R Ekstrand2. 1. The Dental Health Unit, School of Dentistry, The University of Manchester, Williams House, Manchester Science Park, Manchester, M15 6SE, UK. iain.a.pretty@manchester.ac.uk. 2. Department of Odontology, Cariology and Endodontics, Faculty of Health and medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Abstract
AIM: To review the current evidence base of detecting and monitoring early carious lesions in children and adolescents and a rationale proposed to ensure that such lesions are identified and appropriately managed. METHODS: The systematic literature search identified initially a review by Gomez and co-workers from 2013 and this still represents the current state of the science in relation to caries detection and monitoring. The review described among others, visible detection systems, image-based detection systems and point-measurement approaches. RESULTS: The current evidence base suggests that while there are numerous devices or technology-enabled detection systems, the use of a careful, methodical visual inspection of clean, dry teeth, supplemented where indicated by radiographic views, remains the standard of care in caries detection and diagnostics. Further, it is possible by means of existing visible and radiographical systems to monitor lesions over time. Using low-cost intra-oral cameras facilitates the recording of lesion appearance in the patient record and may be of significant benefit in monitoring early lesions over time following their detection. This benefit extends to the clinician and the patient for whom it may be a useful educational and motivational tool. CONCLUSIONS: Recommendations are presented that can be adopted and adapted to local circumstances and that are both substantiated by evidence and promote a clear, simple and consistent approach to caries detection, diagnosis and monitoring in children and adolescents. The diagnoses (initial, active; moderate, active and extensive, active) are linked to appropriate management options within primary care.
AIM: To review the current evidence base of detecting and monitoring early carious lesions in children and adolescents and a rationale proposed to ensure that such lesions are identified and appropriately managed. METHODS: The systematic literature search identified initially a review by Gomez and co-workers from 2013 and this still represents the current state of the science in relation to caries detection and monitoring. The review described among others, visible detection systems, image-based detection systems and point-measurement approaches. RESULTS: The current evidence base suggests that while there are numerous devices or technology-enabled detection systems, the use of a careful, methodical visual inspection of clean, dry teeth, supplemented where indicated by radiographic views, remains the standard of care in caries detection and diagnostics. Further, it is possible by means of existing visible and radiographical systems to monitor lesions over time. Using low-cost intra-oral cameras facilitates the recording of lesion appearance in the patient record and may be of significant benefit in monitoring early lesions over time following their detection. This benefit extends to the clinician and the patient for whom it may be a useful educational and motivational tool. CONCLUSIONS: Recommendations are presented that can be adopted and adapted to local circumstances and that are both substantiated by evidence and promote a clear, simple and consistent approach to caries detection, diagnosis and monitoring in children and adolescents. The diagnoses (initial, active; moderate, active and extensive, active) are linked to appropriate management options within primary care.
Entities:
Keywords:
Caries; Detection; Diagnosis; Early lesions; Management
Authors: A Ferreira Zandoná; E Santiago; G J Eckert; B P Katz; S Pereira de Oliveira; O R Capin; M Mau; D T Zero Journal: J Dent Res Date: 2012-07-19 Impact factor: 6.116
Authors: R S Guedes; C Piovesan; T M Ardenghi; B Emmanuelli; M M Braga; K R Ekstrand; F M Mendes Journal: J Dent Res Date: 2014-04-08 Impact factor: 6.116
Authors: Eps Tagliaferro; A Valsecki Junior; F L Rosell; Src Silva; J L Riley; G H Gilbert; V V Gordan Journal: Oper Dent Date: 2018-09-13 Impact factor: 2.440
Authors: Mary E Northridge; Tina Littlejohn; Nathalie Mohadjeri-Franck; Steven Gargano; Andrea B Troxel; Yinxiang Wu; Robert B Bowe; Paul A Testa Journal: J Public Health Res Date: 2020-05-27
Authors: Mila Janjic Rankovic; Svetlana Kapor; Yegane Khazaei; Alexander Crispin; Ina Schüler; Felix Krause; Kim Ekstrand; Stavroula Michou; Florin Eggmann; Adrian Lussi; Marie-Charlotte Huysmans; Klaus Neuhaus; Jan Kühnisch Journal: Clin Oral Investig Date: 2021-09-04 Impact factor: 3.573
Authors: J Kühnisch; K R Ekstrand; I Pretty; S Twetman; C van Loveren; S Gizani; M Spyridonos Loizidou Journal: Eur Arch Paediatr Dent Date: 2016-01-05
Authors: Song Hee Oh; Sae Rom Lee; Jin Young Choi; Yong Suk Choi; Seong Hun Kim; Hong Cheol Yoon; Gerald Nelson Journal: Sensors (Basel) Date: 2021-03-03 Impact factor: 3.576