Takuji Sato1,2, Takeo Fujita1, Naoya Okada1, Hisashi Fujiwara1, Takashi Kojima3, Ryuichi Hayashi4,2, Hiroyuki Daiko5. 1. Division of Esophageal Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital East, 6-5-1 Kashiwanoha, Kashiwa, 277-8577, Japan. 2. Course of Advanced Clinical Research of Cancer, Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-1-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8421, Japan. 3. Division of Gastroenterological Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan. 4. Division of Head and Neck Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan. 5. Division of Esophageal Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital East, 6-5-1 Kashiwanoha, Kashiwa, 277-8577, Japan. hdaikou@east.ncc.go.jp.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety of early chest tube removal after thoracic esophagectomy with three-field dissection. METHODS: This prospective cohort study evaluated patients who underwent thoracic esophagectomy with three-field dissection during 2013-2015. Patients were divided into two groups according to whether they underwent early or late chest tube removal. Propensity score matching in a 1:1 ratio was applied. We compared the incidences of postoperative pulmonary complications and thoracocentesis in the two groups. RESULTS: After propensity score matching, 89 patients in each group were analyzed. There was no significant difference between the groups in the incidences of pulmonary complications or thoracocentesis. Significantly more patients achieved first mobilization within 15 h postoperatively in the early removal group (89.8%) than in the late removal group (52%, p < 0.01). Multivariate analysis revealed that early chest tube removal was not a risk factor for pulmonary complications or thoracocentesis. Independent risk factors for pulmonary complications were a history of pulmonary disease (odds ratio: 0.81 [0.63-0.98]; p = 0.02) and neoadjuvant chemotherapy (odds ratio: 0.67 [0.32-0.96]; p = 0.04). CONCLUSION: Early chest tube removal is as safe and feasible as late chest tube removal after thoracic esophagectomy with three-field dissection.
PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety of early chest tube removal after thoracic esophagectomy with three-field dissection. METHODS: This prospective cohort study evaluated patients who underwent thoracic esophagectomy with three-field dissection during 2013-2015. Patients were divided into two groups according to whether they underwent early or late chest tube removal. Propensity score matching in a 1:1 ratio was applied. We compared the incidences of postoperative pulmonary complications and thoracocentesis in the two groups. RESULTS: After propensity score matching, 89 patients in each group were analyzed. There was no significant difference between the groups in the incidences of pulmonary complications or thoracocentesis. Significantly more patients achieved first mobilization within 15 h postoperatively in the early removal group (89.8%) than in the late removal group (52%, p < 0.01). Multivariate analysis revealed that early chest tube removal was not a risk factor for pulmonary complications or thoracocentesis. Independent risk factors for pulmonary complications were a history of pulmonary disease (odds ratio: 0.81 [0.63-0.98]; p = 0.02) and neoadjuvant chemotherapy (odds ratio: 0.67 [0.32-0.96]; p = 0.04). CONCLUSION: Early chest tube removal is as safe and feasible as late chest tube removal after thoracic esophagectomy with three-field dissection.
Authors: John M Findlay; Richard S Gillies; Julian Millo; Bruno Sgromo; Robert E K Marshall; Nicholas D Maynard Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2014-03 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Riad N Younes; Jefferson L Gross; Samuel Aguiar; Fabio J Haddad; Daniel Deheinzelin Journal: J Am Coll Surg Date: 2002-11 Impact factor: 6.113
Authors: Donald E Low; Sonia Kunz; Drew Schembre; Henry Otero; Tom Malpass; Alex Hsi; Guobin Song; Richard Hinke; Richard A Kozarek Journal: J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2007-08-31 Impact factor: 3.452