PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to conduct an intervention study designed to assess the effectiveness of using a newsletter to increase medical follow-up in pediatric cancer survivors at risk of selected treatment complications. METHODS:Survivors participating in the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study who were at least 25 years of age and at risk of cardiovascular disease, breast cancer, or osteoporosis related to previous cancer treatment were randomly assigned to receive a newsletter featuring brief health risk information or a newsletter including an insert providing more comprehensive health risk information. A follow-up survey distributed 24 months after the newsletter intervention assessed predictors of medical follow-up. RESULTS: Overall, there were no differences found among the groups in terms of access to a treatment summary, medical follow-up, discussion of childhood cancer health risks, and medical screening for the targeted health behaviors. One exception, indicating borderline significance was that women at risk for osteoporosis who received the newsletter insert were more likely to have discussed their risk with a doctor than those who only received the brief information (10.1 % vs. 4.0 % p = 0.05). Discussion of breast cancer (OR = 2.15; 95 % CI = 1.74-2.66), heart disease (OR = 5.54; 95 % CI = 4.67-6.57) and osteoporosis (OR = 10.6; 95 % CI = 8.34-13.47) risk with physician significantly predicted report of undergoing screening for targeted behavior in previous 2 years as did physician access to treatment summary. CONCLUSIONS: More detailed content in a newsletter had minimal effect on recommended screening. However, survivor's discussion of cancer-related risks with one's doctor significantly influenced participation in health screening. These results highlight the integral role of communication in health behavior. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: This study is designed to assess communication strategies that increase medical follow-up in pediatric cancer survivors at risk of selected treatment complications. The results are of great importance not only to the pediatric oncology community but also the broad range of adult oncology medical specialties who are directly involved in the long-term medical care of this ever increasing population of cancer survivors.
RCT Entities:
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to conduct an intervention study designed to assess the effectiveness of using a newsletter to increase medical follow-up in pediatric cancer survivors at risk of selected treatment complications. METHODS: Survivors participating in the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study who were at least 25 years of age and at risk of cardiovascular disease, breast cancer, or osteoporosis related to previous cancer treatment were randomly assigned to receive a newsletter featuring brief health risk information or a newsletter including an insert providing more comprehensive health risk information. A follow-up survey distributed 24 months after the newsletter intervention assessed predictors of medical follow-up. RESULTS: Overall, there were no differences found among the groups in terms of access to a treatment summary, medical follow-up, discussion of childhood cancer health risks, and medical screening for the targeted health behaviors. One exception, indicating borderline significance was that women at risk for osteoporosis who received the newsletter insert were more likely to have discussed their risk with a doctor than those who only received the brief information (10.1 % vs. 4.0 % p = 0.05). Discussion of breast cancer (OR = 2.15; 95 % CI = 1.74-2.66), heart disease (OR = 5.54; 95 % CI = 4.67-6.57) and osteoporosis (OR = 10.6; 95 % CI = 8.34-13.47) risk with physician significantly predicted report of undergoing screening for targeted behavior in previous 2 years as did physician access to treatment summary. CONCLUSIONS: More detailed content in a newsletter had minimal effect on recommended screening. However, survivor's discussion of cancer-related risks with one's doctor significantly influenced participation in health screening. These results highlight the integral role of communication in health behavior. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: This study is designed to assess communication strategies that increase medical follow-up in pediatric cancer survivors at risk of selected treatment complications. The results are of great importance not only to the pediatric oncology community but also the broad range of adult oncology medical specialties who are directly involved in the long-term medical care of this ever increasing population of cancer survivors.
Authors: Helen I Meissner; Sally W Vernon; Barbara K Rimer; Katherine M Wilson; William Rakowski; Peter A Briss; Robert A Smith Journal: Cancer Date: 2004-09-01 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Kevin C Oeffinger; Ann C Mertens; Melissa M Hudson; James G Gurney; Jacqueline Casillas; Hegang Chen; John Whitton; Mark Yeazel; Yutaka Yasui; Leslie L Robison Journal: Ann Fam Med Date: 2004 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 5.166
Authors: Jane G Zapka; Elaine Puleo; Stephen H Taplin; Karin Valentine Goins; Marianne Ulcickas Yood; Judy Mouchawar; Carol Somkin; M Michele Manos Journal: Prev Med Date: 2004-07 Impact factor: 4.018
Authors: Nina S Kadan-Lottick; Leslie L Robison; James G Gurney; Joseph P Neglia; Yutaka Yasui; Robert Hayashi; Melissa Hudson; Mark Greenberg; Ann C Mertens Journal: JAMA Date: 2002-04-10 Impact factor: 157.335
Authors: Leslie L Robison; Ann C Mertens; John D Boice; Norman E Breslow; Sarah S Donaldson; Daniel M Green; Frederic P Li; Anna T Meadows; John J Mulvihill; Joseph P Neglia; Mark E Nesbit; Roger J Packer; John D Potter; Charles A Sklar; Malcolm A Smith; Marilyn Stovall; Louise C Strong; Yutaka Yasui; Lonnie K Zeltzer Journal: Med Pediatr Oncol Date: 2002-04
Authors: Mark W Yeazel; Kevin C Oeffinger; James G Gurney; Ann C Mertens; Melissa M Hudson; Karen M Emmons; Hegang Chen; Leslie L Robison Journal: Cancer Date: 2004-02-01 Impact factor: 6.921
Authors: Casey L Daniel; Connie L Kohler; Kayla L Stratton; Kevin C Oeffinger; Wendy M Leisenring; John W Waterbor; Kimberly F Whelan; Gregory T Armstrong; Tara O Henderson; Kevin R Krull; Leslie L Robison; Paul C Nathan Journal: Cancer Date: 2015-02-03 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Deirdre A Caplin; Ken R Smith; Kirsten K Ness; Heidi A Hanson; Stephanie M Smith; Paul C Nathan; Melissa M Hudson; Wendy M Leisenring; Leslie L Robison; Kevin C Oeffinger Journal: J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol Date: 2016-10-18 Impact factor: 2.223
Authors: Katie A Devine; Adrienne Viola; Peter Capucilli; Olle Jane Z Sahler; Jeffrey R Andolina Journal: J Pediatr Hematol Oncol Date: 2017-04 Impact factor: 1.289
Authors: Cara I Kimberg; James L Klosky; Nan Zhang; Tara M Brinkman; Kirsten K Ness; Deo Kumar Srivastava; Leslie L Robison; Melissa M Hudson; Kevin R Krull Journal: Cancer Date: 2014-11-06 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Alexandra M Psihogios; Lisa A Schwartz; Janet A Deatrick; Elizabeth S Ver Hoeve; Lindsay M Anderson; Elicia C Wartman; Dava Szalda Journal: J Cancer Surviv Date: 2019-07-04 Impact factor: 4.442
Authors: Claire Snyder; Youngjee Choi; Katherine C Smith; Renee F Wilson; Christina T Yuan; Paul C Nathan; Allen Zhang; Karen A Robinson Journal: JNCI Cancer Spectr Date: 2022-03-02
Authors: Kimberly A Miller; Katherine Y Wojcik; Cynthia N Ramirez; Anamara Ritt-Olson; David R Freyer; Ann S Hamilton; Joel E Milam Journal: Pediatr Blood Cancer Date: 2016-08-27 Impact factor: 3.167
Authors: E Anne Lown; Farya Phillips; Lisa A Schwartz; Abby R Rosenberg; Barbara Jones Journal: Pediatr Blood Cancer Date: 2015-12 Impact factor: 3.167