Literature DB >> 32203428

Prospective analysis of cultures from the Furlow insertion tool: a possible etiology for penile prosthesis infections.

Faysal A Yafi1, James Furr2, Farouk M El-Khatib3, Koenraad van Renterghem4, Luca Venturino5, Robert Andrianne6, Daniar Osmonov7, David Ralph5, Javier Romero Otero8, Maxime Sempels6, Georgios Hatzichristodoulou9, Aaron Lentz10, Steven K Wilson11.   

Abstract

The most dreaded complication of penile prosthesis (PP) implantation is device infection. We sought to assess whether inadequate cleaning and sterilization of the reusable Furlow inserter may represent one of the last etiologies of infection in PP patients. We performed a prospective analysis of cultures of the Furlow inserter used for PP surgeries from seven centers between May 1st and June 30th, 2019. Once the Furlow was received for surgery, the surgical team inspected the device for assembly status (disassembled or not) and the presence of visible stains, pieces of tissue or discoloration on either the interior of the barrel or the plunger. Swab aerobic and anaerobic bacterial and fungal cultures were then obtained from the internal component, after removal from the external component if assembled, and after introduction and immediate removal from the external component if disassembled. A total of 83 Furlow devices were cultured. Median age of surgical instrument was 4 years (2-10 years). Methods of sterilization included autoclave, wet autoclave, steam, and Sterad. Median time from sterilization was 3 days (1-22). On initial presentation, 79 devices were disassembled (95.1%) and 4 devices were still assembled (4.9%). Three external components were discolored (3.6%), while internal components demonstrated two stains (2.4%) indicative of improper cleaning which were thought to be residual blood products. Overall, 2/83 (2.4%) devices revealed positive swab cultures for Staphylococcus epidermidis. Swab cultures were negative for fungi and anaerobic bacteria. This patient cohort will continue to be followed to see if device infection occurs but it is unlikely to be meaningful since contaminated Furlows were discarded. Improper cleaning and/or sterilization of the Furlow Insertion Instrument may represent a source of infection for patients undergoing PP implantation.

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 32203428     DOI: 10.1038/s41443-020-0256-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Impot Res        ISSN: 0955-9930            Impact factor:   2.896


  9 in total

1.  No-touch technique.

Authors:  J François Eid
Journal:  J Sex Med       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 3.802

2.  Hospital outbreak of atypical mycobacterial infection of port sites after laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  R Vijayaraghavan; R Chandrashekhar; Y Sujatha; C S Belagavi
Journal:  J Hosp Infect       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 3.926

3.  Best practice policy statement on urologic surgery antimicrobial prophylaxis.

Authors:  J Stuart Wolf; Carol J Bennett; Roger R Dmochowski; Brent K Hollenbeck; Margaret S Pearle; Anthony J Schaeffer
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2008-02-20       Impact factor: 7.450

4.  Multicenter Investigation of the Micro-Organisms Involved in Penile Prosthesis Infection: An Analysis of the Efficacy of the AUA and EAU Guidelines for Penile Prosthesis Prophylaxis.

Authors:  Martin S Gross; Elizabeth A Phillips; Robert J Carrasquillo; Amanda Thornton; Jason M Greenfield; Laurence A Levine; Joseph P Alukal; William P Conners; Sidney Glina; Cigdem Tanrikut; Stanton C Honig; Edgardo F Becher; Nelson E Bennett; Run Wang; Paul E Perito; Peter J Stahl; Mariano Rosselló Gayá; Mariano Rosselló Barbará; Juan D Cedeno; Edward L Gheiler; Odunayo Kalejaiye; David J Ralph; Tobias S Köhler; Doron S Stember; Rafael E Carrion; Pedro P Maria; William O Brant; Michael W Bickell; Bruce B Garber; Miguel Pineda; Arthur L Burnett; J Francois Eid; Gerard D Henry; Ricardo M Munarriz
Journal:  J Sex Med       Date:  2017-02-08       Impact factor: 3.802

Review 5.  Infection retardant coated inflatable penile prostheses decrease the incidence of infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sree Harsha Mandava; Ege Can Serefoglu; Matthew T Freier; Steven K Wilson; Wayne J G Hellstrom
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2012-09-19       Impact factor: 7.450

6.  Long-term infection outcomes after original antibiotic impregnated inflatable penile prosthesis implants: up to 7.7 years of followup.

Authors:  Culley C Carson; John J Mulcahy; Manya R Harsch
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2010-12-18       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  Perioperative prevention of penile prosthesis infection: practice patterns among surgeons of SMSNA and ISSM.

Authors:  Darren J Katz; Doron S Stember; Christian J Nelson; John P Mulhall
Journal:  J Sex Med       Date:  2012-04-17       Impact factor: 3.802

8.  Penile prosthesis cultures during revision surgery: a multicenter study.

Authors:  Gerard D Henry; Steven K Wilson; John R Delk; Culley C Carson; Ari Silverstein; Mario A Cleves; Craig F Donatucci
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 7.450

9.  Microbial contamination of surgical instruments used for laparotomy.

Authors:  Yuhei Saito; Hiroyoshi Kobayashi; Yushi Uetera; Hiroshi Yasuhara; Takumi Kajiura; Takashi Okubo
Journal:  Am J Infect Control       Date:  2013-11-01       Impact factor: 2.918

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.